Interesting (Spectator video, 11:56).
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Normally I would like to point out that it’s taken this “calamity” to demonstrate why you shouldn’t have DEI, especially in high-powered jobs, if it wasn’t for the fact that so much damage has been done.
This is truly a painful lesson in order to learn something that would have been obvious to a majority of people without the need to cause so much damage.
.. And for all those advocates for women, do they even realize that those women who do have merit will now be trusted a lot less because they will be compared to Rachel Reeves. She is an appalling example of role model if they ever wanted..
LikeLike
It is interesting that Liz Truss and her Chancellor contrived to raise borrowing costs and now Starmer and Reeves. Sadly the Labour ranks will not recognise that what this shows is that “our” creditors (often our own Pension Funds) look at our dismal lack of productivity and simply don’t believe it when politicians claim the borrowing will fuel growth, increasing tax take and therefore easily servicing and paying off the debt. Of course we voted out the PM and Chancellor who kept pointing this out. And voted in the Party least able to stop believing in magic money trees. The women in the labour government constantly look like startled rabbits as they grapple with real problems and their lack of responsibility becomes increasingly obvious. But of course any criticism will be labelled misogyny because women are always “amazing”.
LikeLike