Women and Equalities Committee to hear evidence from habitual liar Laura Bates on misogyny, the manosphere and AI

A government press release. The blonde dingbat’s Lying Feminist of the Month awards are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

7 thoughts on “Women and Equalities Committee to hear evidence from habitual liar Laura Bates on misogyny, the manosphere and AI

  1. Feminists like to tarnish men as ‘foul’. Well, the so-called ‘manosphere’ could be imagined as a safe space for male ‘fowl’ – where young cockerels, roosters and bantams can discuss their problems, and learn from older, more seasoned males how to retain their dignity, sanity, possibly even their lives.

    But, the foxy feminists are circling, requiring only a useful legislative idiot like Starmer to jemmy open the door, for the inevitable carnage.

    Like

  2. Mike – Although Ms Bates is fully deserving of ‘dingbat’ status, and you have much personal experience of her proclivity for whining and barefaced lies, she has been amply endowed, like many of her sex, with a superabundance of native cunning (a word with definite female origins, no matter what the etymologists may say). Women are deeply, deeply afraid of losing the power that they wield over men through control of sex. This fear lay at the dark heart of Ms Bates’ previous endeavour ‘Men Who Hate Women’ and has not changed one iota for her current moan, ‘The New Age of Sexism’.

    Appearing before a GB Parliamentary Committee is no more than a pre-emptive strike against fembots and AI experiences which men may turn to in order to combat their growing social isolation), and bring these thirsty men back to the Plantation.

    Women have little need for such experiences, as their sex drive is limited to a couple of fertile days per month. Also, robots cannot generate wealth which can be transferred to women (although Starmer seems to have his hopes pinned on the wealth generating abilities of AI).

    If the ‘virtual brothels’ which are so distasteful to Ms Bates were engineered to be under exclusive female ownership, with all profits going towards ‘progressive’ feminist causes, I’m sure her worries would disappear.

    Maybe this is the model for the society of the future.

    These fears of Ms Bates, that they may lose control of the price and availability of a certain commodity, are the fears of a ruthless drug dealer, where society has branded the consumer as the criminal, and the dealer as some kind of angel of mercy.

    I am convinced that the society we are presently witnessing is the backlash from the 1960s and 1970s, where women, drunk on the bacchanalia of being able to control their own fertility, went on a spree where they, themselves, set the price too low.

    Happy days those were.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Mike Buchanan Cancel reply