Our thanks to Eli for this gem (12:23).
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Women simply cannot bear the thought of men having leisure-time all-male conversations which they cannot police. Before too long, a group of men will discover that they have much life experience and unique problems in common.
An example – the barrack rooms of WW2. Those men soon discovered that they weren’t the only ones to receive a ‘Dear John..’ letter after they were posted abroad. As a result, the truth about female nature began to emerge, and there was a ten-year trend for film noir in the post-war years, with women depicted as devious, manipulative and ruthless femmes fatales.
It took until the mid-1950s before Hollywood could regain control of the narrative with the wholesome Doris Day, and her pairings with Rock Hudson. The use of this particular leading man should have been a giveaway that it was all a pretence.
The pretence continues to the present day. Netflix have raised it to the stage where it can inform Government policy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. I simply ADORED Doris Day, as so many did. I recall a TV series in which she appeared (in the early 70s, I think) and wore green tights and STILL looked stunning.
I was stunned to discover Rock Hudson was gay! Why are so many gay men handsome, while so many lesbians (especially lesbian feminists, obviously) have faces like bulldogs chewing on wasp nests? I don’t need to name them, there are so many…
LikeLike
Oestrogen has given ‘finer’ features to some men, while misprogramming their brain to prefer men => Rock Hudson.
Testosterone has given coarser features to many feminists, while misprogramming their brain to prefer women => Julie Bindel
This is a thought experiment or Gedankenexperiment, and would require tons of lovely taxpayer money to verify.
LikeLike
I suspect this is why the “manosphere” is treated as practically terrorism. It gives “spaces” to men to exchange experiences and learn from them. In the “Movember” survey in another post on this site actually looking at the data is interesting. The age range is 16-25 and it turns out that the “engagement” (the proportion viewing “manosphere”sites) increases significantly in the 20s. It one looks at what the men are getting from this content it is in fact “self improvement” in terms of employment/wealth creation, health and wellbeing and dealing with relationships. A section on dating and relationships and women is interesting because it illustrates why the older cohorts may seek such sharing and advice. Finding dating and women confusing or frustrating the men share their negative experiences. And all of these are not remotely new or surprising, so long as one doesn’t think women are inhuman saints incapable of foolishness, telling lies or just being rude. Of course we’re used to women’s media constantly going on about the feet of clay men have in the dating/relationship scene. However the latter usually decides its all the fault of men. Interestingly according to the Movember survey generally the men follow “manosphere” advice to change themselves, to improve. Basically to become better partner material. In other words they take personal responsibility to change. And their strategies (rather scoffed at by the Movember researchers) are pretty familiar; become a focussed individual with a good job/career take care of physical and mental health and look like a good provider/protector. One only needs to see the innumerable “where have all the good men gone?” articles to know why this strategy is adopted, because these are precisely the things women say they want! Women, not the liberal arts graduate feminist females who are confused about “woman” and pretty ignorant about men.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s a reason why women scoff at male self-improvement. Something deep in their lizard brain tells them that men are thereby ‘cheating’ Nature, by improving on the cards they were dealt. The female fantasy is that of the godlike male, his body and intellect sculpted by perfect genes rather than laborious self-improvement. These are the imaginary entrants in the great male mating race, where the women wait by the finishing line.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting, thanks!
LikeLike
When you come right down to it, Mike, hardcore feminists are the least feminine women you can imagine, and are actually pursuing a male lifestyle (career instead of babies, seeking female sexual partners) in order to play the cards dealt to them by Nature.
This may be an advantageous angle to explore in ‘laughing at feminists’. Pretty much guaranteed that feminists won’t like it.
‘Feminists’ and ‘pretty’. Now there’s two words you don’t often see together in the same sentence!
LikeLike
Thanks cp, agreed.
LikeLiked by 1 person