The Glass Blind Spot: “Not Every Day” (2019). LAUGHING AT FEMINISTS comedy channel video #28 of 171.

Today’s video is here (2:03).

For the next few months we’ll be posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.

You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2013, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Alarm at ‘anti-white’ sentencing guidelines

A new piece by Kathy Gyngell for TCW. I’ve posted the following comments:

“To expand on the Robert Jenrick remark. The new guidelines are not only ‘anti-white’, they’re anti-male, as females will be the beneficiaries of more pre-sentencing reports. This is on top of a criminal justice system which already treats men far more harshly than women – esspecially with regards to custodial sentences – as described in forensic detail in William Collins’s “The Empathy Gap: Male Disadvantages and the Mechanisms of Their Neglect”. The ebook is a steal at under £5.00.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Joshua Rozenberg: “Sense in sentencing”

Joshua Rozenberg is a British lawyer and the husband of Melanie Phillips. Our thanks to DM for this. He writes:

“The Sentencing Council still do not want to remove women from the list of “cohorts” who should get a pre-sentence report before deciding on a community service or custodial sentence. Blatant sexism!!”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

The gender accountability gap

I spend some time most days posting comments in response to articles in media outlets including The Times, The Spectator, Substack, Unherd, Quillette. It’s a productive way to introduce more people to our materials. The comments attract both support and challenges, the latter usually from feminists.

Last Monday The Times published an article (£) by Melanie Phillips, Assault on masculinity has only created cavemen. I posted a number of comments and one feminist genius replied with:

“Mike, you’re traumatised by a failed relationship. Please get professional help with your residual anger. It’s not good for your health.”

Later she posted this:

“Kyle Clifford.”

I replied with this:

“Thank you for giving me the perfect opportunity to write about the gender accountability gap.

I assume you’re implying that Kyle Clifford’s murder of three women says something about the nature of men as violent, in contrast with the peaceful nature of women. This is an old feminist tactic – presenting the worst of men as representative of men, while presenting the best of women as representative of women. A few thoughts:

The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK) was published in May 2013 in the journal Partner Abuse and is the most comprehensive review of domestic violence research ever carried out. This unparallelled three-year research project was conducted by 42 scholars at 20 universities and research centres.

A key numerical result from the PASK review was:

“Among large population samples, 57.9% of intimate-partner violence (IPV) reported was bi-directional, 42.1% unidirectional, 13.8% of the unidirectional violence was male-to-female, 28.3% was female-to-male.”

Women cause men’s deaths in ways including denying them access to their children, a major driver of the high male suicide rate.

So you imply a man responsible for killing three women says something about men. But you ignore the millions of British women who’ve killed 10+ million unborn children since the 1967 Abortion Act. Of course the reality is hidden behind such feminist euphemisms as “reproductive rights” and “bodily autonomy”. That’s the gender accountability gap.

Mike Buchanan

JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Alistair Williams: “Gender Studies – It’s One Way To Get Screwed!” (2019). LAUGHING AT FEMINISTS comedy channel video #27 of 171.

Today’s video is here (11:09).

For the next few months we’ll be posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.

You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2013, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Robert Franklin: “The War in Ukraine: A Solution Ignored.”

Interesting. A key passage:

“So, according to the usual suspects, this is the gravest of crises, one that risks WWIII but whose only acceptable solution is a peace that no one believes is possible. You figure it out; I can’t.

If that’s not enough, U.S. and European observers say that Ukraine’s main problem is a shortage of military personnel. Many Ukrainian men have been killed or disabled, many have deserted and many are resisting conscription, so Ukraine is hamstrung by a lack of combat personnel with which to forestall a catastrophe of unimaginable horror. What to do?

Well, one thing to do is (a) screamingly obvious, (b) reasonably simple and (c) completely ignored. Ukraine has plenty of warm bodies with which to prosecute its war, but is frankly ignoring them. I refer of course to Ukrainian women, many of whom are perfectly capable of shouldering a rifle and stopping a bullet. Currently, only about 65,000 women are serving, all of them having volunteered. That’s about 7% of the total active force. If the main problem is a shortage of personnel and if the survival of the nation, the absorption of Poland by Russia and WWIII are at stake, why leave half the population on the sidelines?

Clearly, the Ukrainian military brass doesn’t doubt women’s ability to serve; otherwise, what are those 65,000 women doing in uniform? And of course other countries, like the U.S. and Israel, loudly ballyhoo women’s ability to do all military jobs. And yet, neither the U.S., nor Europe, nor NATO nor Zelensky has even hinted at doing an obvious and simple thing to avert Armageddon. At the very least, putting hundreds of thousands of additional troops in the field would add hugely to our bargaining power against Putin.

And yet, complete silence, aka, just more of the same.

When Russia invaded in February of 2022, the news brimmed with stories of Ukrainian women, children and old people streaming toward Poland and military-age men streaming toward their nearest enlistment office. Not a word about women in combat, even amid the then-widely-held belief that Russia would overwhelm Ukraine in a matter of weeks or possibly even days. Feminists nowhere took to the streets demanding gender equality, rolling up their sleeves, flexing their bi-ceps and proclaiming “we can do it!”

The end of Ukraine is supposedly at stake but it doesn’t do the obvious to save itself. Strange.

Or maybe not so strange.

After all, when it comes to being slaughtered in war, women’s exemption and men’s disposability are the oldest of traditions. Human history may be a story of constant change, but not when it comes to who fights wars. The only difference between today and the time of Julius Caesar is that now we pretend to embrace gender equality, while happily turning a blind eye to it when it suits us.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Electrician wins £700,000 estate fight after sister Margaret Baverstock seen on video helping their dying mother sign will

A shocking case. The final paragraph:

“With no other known will in existence, the judge held that Margaret Baverstock died “intestate”, which means brother and sister must now split her £700,000 assets down the middle, although Lisa must also pay John’s legal fees, estimated at up to £80,000.”

Margaret Baverstock should be prosecuted for the attempted fraud, but won’t be, because vagina.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.