If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Justice for Men & Boys 
I don’t claim to be an expert on this but I believe that a disproportionate number of men who commit rape were themselves sexually abused by a woman when they were children. If that is the case you would think that feminists would be keen to see female abusers brought to justice’ but they seem to have a blind spot.
LikeLike
Hi John. Studies of incarcerated (male) rapists in both the US and UK showed that a majority had been abused as children by one or more women, sometimes their own mothers. Feminists have a blind spot with respect to ALL female wrongdoing regardless of the consequences to men, women and children.
LikeLike
Because feminists rely on the gynocentric current in our society that regards females as always good and therefore worthy of privileges and special protections. To admit girls or women are not uniformly such saintly undermines their whole thesis. After all the current policies to close all female prisons can only be justified if all women who commit crime are in fact “victims” in some way who need “help and support” rather than punishment, for they cannot themselves be responsible for their actions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A good example of one of Janice’s observations in her excellent essay is this School inspector sacked for brushing water off child’s head wins six-year unfair dismissal case against Ofsted | The Independent For behind it is the assumption that somehow all males are suspect predators, so this man’s simple kindly action became a “safeguarding” issue in a way that the same casual assistance by a female Ofsted inspector would never had been. The man is assumed to be “guilty” even though the Judge finally ruling on this says he can’t find anything that says there is a “rule” to be broken. In other words the man was found t be “guilty” and sacked even though in fact the employer didn’t know what he was guilty of! In such an atmosphere where one can lose a job and be labelled a threat to children without even doing something against the “rules” it is no wonder the teaching profession finds it hard to recruit men!
LikeLiked by 1 person