Our thanks to Eli for this (video, 9:34). It includes (7:32 – 8:20) newly-obtained video of the collision. It beggars belief that the helicopter didn’t change course at least in the final seconds, so as to avoid the collision.
The “she” of the video title is a “journalist” from the left-leaning news organisation CNN, quizzing The Don about his prescient theory that DEI programmes were a cause of the Washington DC collision. Very unusually, the FAA acceded to the woman’s family’s request that she not be named. Because women mustn’t be held accountable even after they’ve died and (it seems) been responsible for a major tragedy (60+ people died, there were no survivors).
Psychologists have long known that women have inferior spatial awareness than men, and tend to be more anxious. Did the woman maybe “freeze” when faced with the situation? If this happens in peacetime, what might we expect in the heat of battle?
Women have no place on the front line and are a danger to colleagues and themselves. We hope The Don will order the end of initiatives to put women into roles that, in wartime, would put them on the front line, and redeploy women already in such positions to be redeployed to other roles away from the front line.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Army Withholds Identity of Helicopter Pilot Killed in Crash – The New York Times
I note that the crew of the passenger jet were also named . I doubt the families of the male crew in the Helicopter were given the option of privacy. So we are left to draw our own conclusions about who the Military think was responsible.
LikeLike
Thanks Nigel. I have raid no accounts saying that either of the men were in control of the flight at the time of the collision. I guess the military think not revealing the woman’s identity will lessen the publicity.
LikeLike
Yes Newsweek reported the female pilot was at the controls at the time of the crash. Apparently she had 500 hours flying experience and the flight was an exercise practicing rapid evacuation of government in times of danger. The flight experience of the two others are quoted. As you say a lit is already known so it is pretty obvious that this is an attempt to play down the pilot.
LikeLike
As for the ATC issues. Well until Obama era DEI the ATC in the US had every employers dream; a ‘pipeline’which saw potential ATCs join a university course. During which they were educated and trained and of course also “vetted” tested. So that by the time of recruitment there was a pool of suitable trained applicants who had shown their commitment. This was junked in favour of an open recruitment. One simple practical result is of course that the training has to be done after the potential ATC has been employed, prolonging the period of time before the new recruit can actually be fully deployed. It also means more attrition as inevitably some recruits will either leave because they don’t like the job after all or have to leave because they are unsuitable.Things that are sorted during the feeder courses in the previous model. Again making the process less likely to fill vacancies quickly. So not only do you drop standards you are also making recruitment much slower with higher attrition with consequently an incentive to put ATCs on the coal face before they are fully trained to speed things up. This more subtle effect of DEI in making recruitment more difficult and attrition in the process greater can be seen in our forces too. So it exaserbates staff shortages as well as reduces competence.
LikeLike