4 thoughts on “Misogyny a ‘significant’ predictor of violent extremism”
In Australia, Canberra has reputation for being a bland, anodyne sort of place – the sort of place where nothing ever happens, and everyone goes slowly mad. This piece in the Canberra Times is clear proof of that.
These are the relevant questions listed in the report:
Q34. Violence is justified to establish a proper religious order and make people submit to the authority of God and the Bible
Q36. If someone criticises or undermines my ethnic group, then it is ok to use violence against them.
Q37. It has gone beyond a joke. All we are saying is that it’s okay to be white, and we get cancelled. It just shows that violence is the only way for white people to have a fair chance in the world.
Q38. The rich will not give up their wealth easily. Organised violence including against people is the only way to redistribute wealth to the poor.
Q39. In a communist state, it is okay for landowners to use violence to take back their private property
Q40. It is understandable that young men who are rejected by women and starved of sex resort to violent vengeance
Q42. Feminism is damaging to our society and should resisted by force if necessary
Why, in question 42, is the word force used when all the others use violence/violent?
Why is question 42 qualified by “if necessary” when none of the others are?
It’s almost as if the questions are designed to elicit a predetermined result.
Justice for Men & Boys 
In Australia, Canberra has reputation for being a bland, anodyne sort of place – the sort of place where nothing ever happens, and everyone goes slowly mad. This piece in the Canberra Times is clear proof of that.
LikeLike
Thanks Robert, indeed!
LikeLike
These are the relevant questions listed in the report:
Q34. Violence is justified to establish a proper religious
order and make people submit to the authority of God
and the Bible
Q36. If someone criticises or undermines my ethnic
group, then it is ok to use violence against them.
Q37. It has gone beyond a joke. All we are saying is that it’s
okay to be white, and we get cancelled. It just shows that
violence is the only way for white people to have a fair
chance in the world.
Q38. The rich will not give up their wealth easily.
Organised violence including against people is the only
way to redistribute wealth to the poor.
Q39. In a communist state, it is okay for landowners to use
violence to take back their private property
Q40. It is understandable that young men who are
rejected by women and starved of sex resort to violent
vengeance
Q42. Feminism is damaging to our society and should
resisted by force if necessary
Why, in question 42, is the word force used when all the others use violence/violent?
Why is question 42 qualified by “if necessary” when none of the others are?
It’s almost as if the questions are designed to elicit a predetermined result.
LikeLike
Thanks Dennis, interesting!
LikeLike