Our thanks to Gerry for this. The lesbian claims to be involved in a “throuple” with her ghost hunter girlfriend and a 6’6″ tall, blonde, blue-eyed ghost man.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

We’re linking daily to selected video / audio video files from our YouTube channel. Today’s file is here (video, 55:26). —————————- If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’. Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here. If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

We’re linking daily to selected video / audio video files from our YouTube channel. Today’s file is here (video, 59:39). —————————- If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’. Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here. If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

Appalling. Usual BBC feminist bias in the piece.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

We’re linking daily to selected video / audio video files from our YouTube channel. Today’s file is here (video, 1:37:45). —————————- If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’. Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here. If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

Our thanks to Gerry for this. I note that the Mail Online has started to limit free access, requiring readers to subscribe to get full article content. The first month is free, thereafter £4.99pcm. We’ve just subscribed as we probably link to more mainstream media stories on Mail Online than all other sources combined.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

Enjoy.

Two days ago we published a piece titled Former civil servant Kevin Legge, who claimed he was sacked from the Environment Agency for not being a feminist, is ordered to pay £20,000 for ‘vexatious’ and ‘unreasonable’ case. Our thanks to “James” for posting comments, reproduced here with his permission:

“Women bringing claims to the employment tribunal receive huge payments, on the basis of the most tenuous of complaints of “discrimination” (see Wendy Williams v MOD, Birmingham employment tribunal, £560,000 and Rebecca Kalam v West Mids police, Birmingham employment tribunal, £830,000).

Yet, where a man brings complaints of discrimination, he is forced to pay tens of thousands of pounds to the very people who have discriminated against him.

It is no wonder that very few men bring claims of sex discrimination to the employment tribunal, let alone are “allowed” to win. The only case that I am aware of is Furlong v Cheshire police.

I assume that many men do not bring claims, because they assume (probably correctly) that the “system” is biased and discriminatory against men and in favour of women, or they are unaware that men are afforded (in principle) the same “protections” under the law as women – the protected characteristic, is “sex”.

This Environment Agency case has parallels with what I have experienced, whilst working for a large a public sector (government) body. Some of the particular discrimination that I have personally experienced in the public sector:

• a female dominated HR department that has been described as engaging in “institutional misandry”.

• myself being paid substantially less than women for doing exactly the same work.

• the “gender pay gap” being used as a reason for paying women more than men, and for recruiting or promoting less qualified women into the higher paid positions. (Note: it is unlawful to pay a man less than a woman for doing the same work, but it is NOT unlawful to pay women less than men ON AVERAGE).

• rigged / biased performance reviews that give preferential treatment to women and “male allies” to give them higher bonuses and pay rises.

• rigged / biased “competency based” interviews (using subjective criteria rather than objective criteria) and the promotion or recruitment of women who do not hold the qualifications required by the positions over men who do.

• shortlisting women for interview despite not holding the required qualifications, and then appointing them into the position over better qualified men who do hold the required qualifications.

• women being provided with more training and development (which leads to higher pay), and then this being used to claim that they are “better” and more “deserving” of recruitment or promotion into the higher paid positions, or bigger pay rises and bonuses.

• positive discrimination and quotas being used to give preferential treatment to women on an almost unlimited basis, but the company calling this “positive action” and “targets” to disguise the discriminatory intent (positive action and targets are lawful, positive discrimination and quotas are not).

• using “equity” to give preferential treatment to women and minorities, but calling this “equality”.

• serious sexual harassment by a male manager towards another man, about which nothing was done. This within the same company that has penalised men for “sexual harassment masquerading as banter”.

• a grievance system that discriminates in favour of women and against men. Rewards and preferential treatment being given to women who make complaints, but victimisation and harassment of a man who made complaints.

• it is apparent that the (taxpayer funded) employment tribunal offers no protection whatsoever for men who are being discriminated against, and if anything the employment tribunal further discriminates against men who bring claims of discrimination.

I am not sure what, if anything, can be done to raise awareness of this issue, or to elicit any form of change, so that the tribunal system gives fair and equal treatment to men who make complaints of discrimination.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

An appalling miscarriage of justice. The start of the BBC piece:

“The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has offered an “unreserved apology” to an innocent man who spent 17 years in prison.

Andrew Malkinson was wrongly convicted of raping a woman in Salford in 2003, but was exonerated in July 2023 by DNA testing.

CCRC chairwoman Helen Pitcher said she was “deeply sorry” for “failing” Mr Malkinson.

In response, he criticised her for waiting until the conclusion of an independent review before offering the apology, calling it “too little, too late”.

Mr Malkinson was formally acquitted in July 2023 but it later emerged that DNA implicating another suspect was discovered four years after he was jailed.

He had written to the CCRC, the body set up to review criminal convictions and check for potential miscarriages of justice, asking it to refer his case to the Court of Appeal in 2009.

In 2012 it refused to do so and also refused new forensic testing, before declining a second application in 2020.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

Sir Philip on good form. He covered this issue in his ICMI16 speech in London – The Justice Gender Gap (44:48).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.