Philip Davies MP and Esther McVey MP interview Jan James on Parental Alientation (GB News)

Our thanks to Douglas for pointing us to a piece posted on the GB News YT channel today – here (video, 9:14). Jan James was a speaker at ICMI20.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Spiked: The myth of toxic masculinity (Brendan O’Neill and Nina Power)

Our thanks to Mike P for this (audio, 59:11). He writes:

You may well have seen this already on SP!KED, the headline alone is bound to attract ones attention!
The item itself is a little disappointing I fear, featuring an interviewee who reveals she’s forty something, but giggles her way through it like she’s 14. It also covers stuff we realised many years ago, but offers only a little advance over The Red Pill film, for example.
However that’s not the point, which is that it was narrowcast at all in a fairly well known media outlet with mildish and often rational, non-woke leftish leanings….


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Lord Ashcroft: Carrie Johnson’s behaviour is preventing the Prime Minister leading Britain as effectively as the voters deserve

Interesting. Doubtless the woman is also responsible for BoJo becoming ever more feminist-compliant over time.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Douglas Murray: Identity Politics is Dangerous

Our thanks to Rick for this (1:11:41), and the extract Don’t Trust Male Feminists (8:14).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Free Speech Union: Weekly News Round-Up

Dear Mike Buchanan,

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter, our round-up of the free speech news of the week. As with all our work, this newsletter depends on the support of our members and donors, so if you’re not already a paying member please sign up today or encourage a friend to join and help us turn the tide against cancel culture.

Seven-year-olds to be taught they are not “racially innocent” under Brighton Council plans

Brighton and Hove City Council has been accused of indoctrination over its plans to embed “anti-racism” in its schools. Under the plan, children as young as seven would be told that they are not “racially innocent”. All teachers would have to undergo “anti-racism” training, and slides seen by the Telegraph teach trainee teachers that children as young as three “learn to attach value to skin colour; white at the top of the hierarchy and black at the bottom”. Former Minister for Education Sir John Hayes called on the Government to introduce guidance forbidding such divisive lessons about race in schools, and new guidance is expected soon. The Council is spending £100,000 on the project, which was launched following the death of George Floyd.

Tom Leonard reviewed Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America by John McWhorter in the Daily Mail. He noted: “McWhorter writes mainly about the US, but many of his points are readily applicable to the UK, where only three months ago the Department for Education had to warn schools not to teach the concept of ‘white privilege’ as fact.”

Captain Tom tweet prosecution should never have happened

Joseph Kelly was found guilty under the Communications Act for sending a “grossly offensive” message about Captain Sir Tom Moore, a decision that has attracted widespread criticism. The FSU has called for the section of the Act under which Kelly was charged and convicted to be repealed.

Sending a mean tweet shouldn’t be a crime, said Stephen Daisley in the Spectator and Madeline Grant in the Telegraph. In Spiked, Ian O’Doherty said free speech is for idiots like Kelly, too.

Online trolls could face two years in prison if their messages are deemed “likely to cause harm”, the Government has said. Ministers are planning to repeal some communications offences and replace them with a new offence based on likely psychological harm in the Online Harms Bill.

Spotify “content warnings” are “not enough”, claim censorious artists trying to remove Joe Rogan’s podcast

The campaign to get Joe Rogan’s podcast removed from Spotify continued this week. Harry and Meghan have expressed “concerns” to Spotify about Rogan’s podcast, and Joni Mitchell joined Neil Young in having her music removed from the platform while the podcast remains on it. Although Spotify hasn’t yet complied, our founder Toby Young warned in the Spectator that the company’s “track record on free speech isn’t great”, and that many other podcasts have been removed from the platform during the pandemic. Likewise, Stephen Armstrong wrote that the pandemic had been a nightmare for free speech. Spotify has announced it will apply “content warnings” to podcasts discussing the pandemic, a decision decried by Ella Whelan in the Telegraph. The White House has urged Spotify to go further and the comedian Stewart Lee has added his voice to those calling for Rogan to be no-platformed.

Writing for UnHerd, Ben Sixsmith criticised those whose “instinctive response to hearing opinions they disagree with is to want them silenced”. Also writing for UnHerd, Jarryd Bartle said the calls to boycott Spotify over the podcast were a troubling case study in the new breed of online activism that centres around “the urge to censor”. Don’t boycott Neil Young in revenge, argued Darragh McManus – and Ross Clark in the Spectator agreed. “The day we banish people from spouting unpopular opinions, even nutty ideas, is the day that we submit to being ruled by a tyranny of officially sanctioned experts,” he wrote. Winston Marshall wrote about the new age of artist-driven censorship.

Medics speak out against bullying tactics in trans debate

Former nurse Rachel Meade risks losing her job after having expressed her concern for women’s safety if men are able to access women-only spaces under gender self-identification proposals. She’s crowdfunding to challenge the decision of Social Work England to sanction her. Please do support her if you can.

Despite an open letter from 719 nurses and midwives calling on the Nursing and Midwives Council to disaffiliate from Stonewall, the regulator has refused to do so. Concerns have again been raised about the public health implications of replacing words such as mum with birth giver. Writing in the Telegraph, Suzanne Moore argued against the continuing elimination of words like mother and breastfeeding.

The EHRC is right to warn about the dangers of an overly broad ban on conversion therapy, argued Julie Bindel in the Spectator. The FSU has submitted its response to the government’s consultation on banning conversion therapy and took a similar line to Julie – under the proposals, it could be unlawful for a clinician to refer a child presenting with gender dysphoria to a psychotherapist, which cannot be right.

Police clamp down on opposition to trans ideology

Congratulations to barrister Sarah Phillimore, who has succeeded after 453 days in getting the police to delete a “non-crime hate incident” recorded against her name for tweets critical of trans ideology and organised religion. We are continuing to assist FSU members in doing the same and will shortly publish an FAQs on our website advising people how to get NCHIs recorded against their names removed.

A mother of three was questioned under caution for having raised safeguarding concerns to Girlguiding UK about the role of Girl Guide Commissioner Monica Sulley, a transwoman who had previously posed online with a rifle and posted pictures to social media dressed as a dominatrix.

Meanwhile, a charity founder had the police turn up at her house to “ascertain her thinking” after her charity posted a statement cutting ties with the “trans-inclusive” Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre. Joana Cherry MP said the police’s actions were “the stuff of totalitarianism”. A formal complaint has been made by Fair Play for Women about the police’s actions. Brendan O’Neill said that Orwell tropes are overused, but the actions of the police in this case really were like those of the thought police. Jo Bartosch wrote in Spiked that the police seem more interested in silencing gender-critical views than stopping violent crime.

Women refuse to be silenced by trans activists

Labour MP Rosie Duffield has said she might be forced to quit over the abuse she has received for speaking out in the trans debate. Last year she was unable to attend the party’s conference over safety concerns. She said: “It is obsessive harassment. Neither the Labour Party nor the former or current leader or the whips’ office have done anything at all to stop it, to offer me any support, help or legal assistance.” The MP was praised by Joanna Williams in Spiked for her commitment to continue arguing for women’s sex-based rights. Joan Smith asked why Keir Starmer won’t speak up to defend Duffield.

Natalie Bird, the Lib Dem candidate expelled from the party for having worn a T-shirt bearing the phrase “woman: adult human female” asked in the Critic what’s so controversial about the statement.

University of Bristol student Rosario Sánchez will be in court this month to sue the University for victimisation, indirect sex discrimination, and sexual harassment for its failure to protect her from being harassed by militant trans activists who have been targeting her.

Institutional capture in woke British Library and Civil Service

Staff at the British Library are to be asked to wear “pronoun badges”.

Civil servants are undertaking training on trans and intersex inclusion during working time, reported Guido Fawkes.

Cancel culture

Author Kate Clanchy has a new publisher. She has been taken on by Swift Press after Pan Macmillan severed relations with her following a row about politically incorrect language in her most recent book. Clanchy told the Sunday Times the experience of being targeted by a Twitchfork mob pushed her to the edge. Melanie Phillips lambasted the literary world for betraying her and failing to defend artistic freedom.

Kenan Malik urged Guardian readers to remember that freedom of speech has protected the powerless throughout history. Juliet Samuel said the case of UUP leader Doug Beattie was a rare example of forgiveness amid the cancel culture frenzy. Davina McCall spoke of her fear of being cancelled. Cancel culture has no rhyme or reason, argued Michael Deacon, questioning why some artists were seemingly too big to be erased while others were singled out for punishment.

Sir Tom Devine: “racist gang” smear was defamation

Sir Tom Devine has received legal advice that he was defamed by Sir Geoff Palmer, who described him as being part of a “racist gang”. Sir Tom does not, however, intend to sue. He also said that the two universities he is affiliated with didn’t do enough in response to the completely baseless accusation. We wrote to the University of Edinburgh raising Sir Tom’s case and urging the institution to act. Our letter and the Vice-Chancellor’s response can be read here. Meanwhile, Sir Geoff has criticised plans to rename Linlithgow pub The Black Bitch. Its owners fear the name has racist connotations, even though the name refers to a dog.

Oliver Twist is the latest classic to be given a trigger warning by a university. Jacob Rees-Mogg said students at Royal Holloway should grow up.

America

FIRE has released its rankings of the 10 worst universities for free speech. Pano Kanelos, President of the new non-woke University of Austin, spoke to the Wall Street Journal about his mission to remake higher education in America. Meanwhile, Georgetown students are demanding Ilya Shapiro be fired for tweets criticising Biden’s decision to limit his choice of Supreme Court Justice to black women.

There has been a surge in book-banning campaigns in libraries across America, the Times reported, as parents campaign against schools displaying texts on gender identity.

Whoopi Goldberg was suspended for two weeks by ABC for her comments about the Holocaust and subsequent botched apology. Read a blog post by the CEO of the US Free Speech Union Benjamin Schwarz about why she should not have been suspended.

Islamic blasphemy laws

Journalist Ophélie Meunier is living under police protection following the release of a documentary she made about the impact of radical Islam in France.

Wasiq Wasiq wrote for Spiked about the case of Aneeqa Ateeq, the Pakistani woman sentenced to death for supposedly “blasphemous” WhatsApp messages.

Forthcoming lecture: free speech from Socrates to social media

Join us in London for a live public lecture, discussion, and book launch on 17 March. Jacob Mchangama will be introducing his new book, Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media. Jacon is an author and lawyer, as well as the founder and director of Justitia, a Copenhagen-based think tank focusing on human rights, freedom of speech and the rule of law.

Following a short lecture, Jacob will be joined in conversation by Dr Joanna Williams, writer and director of Cieo, and Toby Young. The panel will be chaired by Baroness Fox, director of the Academy of Ideas.

The discussion will be followed by a wine reception, hosted by Basic Books. Tickets are £10 /£5, with special rates for FSU members who use this link or enter the promo code FSUmember. Please book early, as we anticipate selling out. Founder members should email events@freespeechunion.org in the next seven days if they would like a complimentary ticket.

You can watch our recent Speakeasy with free speech warrior Harry Miller here.

We’re hiring!

If you’d like to get involved in our work, we currently have three new posts available. Join our communications team as our Director of Digital Content and Marketing, or as our Communications Officer. We’re also seeking a Director of Data and Impact to help expand our membership base. We’re keen to fill the positions quickly, so will begin the interview process on a rolling basis.

Sharing the newsletter

As with all our work, this newsletter depends on the support of our members and donors, so if you’re not already a paying member please sign up today or encourage a friend to join.

You can share our newsletter on social media with the buttons below to help us spread the word. If someone has shared this newsletter with you and you’d like to join the FSU, you can find our website here.

Best wishes,

Benjamin Jones

@BenBarryJones

Case Officer


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Bettina Arndt: The dreadful toll of campus injustice

Just in from Tina:

Open this for the photograph of the back of the man’s head.

A few years ago, an engaging. young, overseas-trained doctor arrived in one of our biggest cities to do post-graduate research. He was a popular and confident student, soon appointed to leadership roles at the university college where he was staying, thrilled to be part of its student community.

Look at the photograph of him taken a year later, after his hair started to fall out (alopecia) through stress after monstrous treatment from a university following an unfounded, malicious sexual assault allegation. Two years later, a jury took 20 minutes to dismiss the case after a two-week trial. After the criminal trial the court took the unusual step of awarding costs against the Crown, with the judge stating a proper investigation would have revealed that the complainant was “very substantially lacking credit” and the case should not have been commenced.

But there was never any proper investigation. As is true in the kangaroo courts operating at universities across Australia, this young man was treated abominably by this tertiary institution. After the complaint was made, he was told he had two hours to leave the college, and was not allowed to discuss with anyone why he was being evicted. Relevant witnesses were never interviewed, he had no chance to present a proper response to the allegations. He was dumped far from his former college in an untidy, dirty room, complete with bars on every window, alone, and desperate. And he was publicly shamed with the accuser spreading lies about what had happened.

The coordinators of his post-grad program were told, before he was even charged, that he could not take part in clinical work or research because he was under investigation. His education plans were derailed, his life put on hold. He has spent the last few years working as a waiter, couch surfing with friends or living in a hostel, having spent his savings, with help from his family, defending his criminal case. Since he contacted me in late 2020, we have been doing our best to support him, including using immigration lawyers to keep him in the country whilst pursuing action against the university.

Late last year our excellent campus justice team achieved a confidential settlement with the university. Our doctor is now studying, and seeking medical registration to practice in Australia.  Meanwhile universities across the country continue to believe the victim irrespective of the strengths of any defence which could be raised by the accused. The presumption of innocence as a cornerstone of our system of justice is ignored. Peremptory findings of guilt are made without due process. In Australia each year dozens of accused young men are shafted by tertiary institutions to appease the feminist lynch mob.

A case with a difference

What’s unusual about our young doctor’s story is he didn’t fall victim to an aggrieved young woman. He is openly gay and his accuser was male. But the ‘believe-the-victim’ rules applied just the same, even though the accuser was a known trouble-maker, having attracted unfavourable attention for making aggressive comments to women in the college.

There’s a worrying parallel to the Melbourne story I published early this year in that our doctor, like Chris from Melbourne, had a supervisory role in the college, requiring him to look after students. It says a lot about the vulnerability of men in this circumstance who are required to impose rules that easily create resentment amongst students, setting themselves up for vengeful allegations.

Our doctor was asked by a director of the college to speak to the accuser about a particular incident of being aggressive towards a female student and to urge him to seek counselling. He did that and the accuser reacted badly, accusing him of betraying their friendship. But then, a few days later the accuser was all over the doctor, openly flirting with him in public, inviting himself to his room – in front of witnesses. They’d just started consensually kissing when the accuser suddenly jumped up and left the room, for no apparent reason. It seems likely this was all a set-up, a clumsy form of entrapment as payback for the doctor’s role in reprimanding him for his bad behaviour.

Our doctor then discovered the accuser was claiming he had been sexually assaulted by him. The doctor made a report to the student liaison officer, explaining it was a false accusation, listing witnesses who could confirm the proceeding events that evening.  This evidence was not pursued.

Within a week the doctor learnt an official sexual assault complaint had been made alleging digital anal penetration without consent had occurred during the encounter in his room. Ultimately the jury found our doctor not guilty of this charge, with a subsequent Court finding the allegation couldn’t be substantiated due to the complainant’s lack of credibility and the blatantly sexually flirtatious behaviour by the complainant who had changed his complaint and lied to the police multiple times with many inconsistencies in his story; and that he had tried to suppress evidence and influence witnesses.

Vital evidence supporting the accused had been withheld by numerous officials at the university during their contact with the police and it required subpoenas and orders from the judge to force it to release this information during the trial.

Even after the jury dismissed the case and the court made its clear ruling, the university kept open the option of conducting their own misconduct investigation. It took around eight months for the institution to retreat from that path – more stress for our much-wronged doctor, more work for our lawyers.

Tackling the big picture

Whilst we celebrate this settlement over a university, it is so frustrating that the legal grounds came down to trying to prove these officials had slipped up in minor areas of administrative law – rather than addressing the use of these draconian regulations to adjudicate sexual assault.

There must be more we can do to tackle the broader issue of the right of our universities to usurp criminal law using their current unfair, anti-male regulatory mechanisms. Long term readers of my blog will remember my excitement back in November 2019, when Justice Ann Lyons made a judgement in a pivotal case involving a University of Queensland medical student who was accused of sexual assault by another student.

Wendy Mulcahy, the lawyer for the accused student, took the matter to the Queensland Supreme Court arguing that UQ did not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate such matters. Justice Lyons concluded universities are only entitled to make decisions in sexual assault cases which have been proved in criminal court. You can read the judgement here.

The University of Queensland then appealed that decision and in October 2020 the Court of Appeal in Queensland overruled Lyon’s reasoning that it is not appropriate for universities to deal with such criminal matters. The appeal judges concluded that it’s fine for universities to investigate and make decisions about sexual assault and impose their own sanctions on these students, as I discussed here.

Whilst acknowledging procedural fairness was an issue in the UQ case, Justice McMurdo made this comment: “I am unable to accept that in no such case could a hearing of an allegation of this kind be conducted with procedural fairness to the student.”

The learned Justice acknowledged that the UQ procedures are grossly unfair to accused students – a situation which applies in universities across Australia. But since it is just possible that a university could do a great job usurping criminal justice, he concluded we should just let this issue slide by.

Now I know I have many lawyers reading this, and many of you have good contacts in the law. I’m putting the word out that this issue needs urgent attention. There must be other legal avenues to address this broader issue of the legality of universities making decisions about these significant criminal matters using secretive committees with no public oversight, using no proper investigations, no access to a lawyer nor normal legal protections for the accused, and employing the lowest possible standard of proof – the balance of probabilities.

As long ago as 1938 in Briginshaw v Briginshaw the High Court of Australia established the proper standard of proof in civil matters when an accused’s reputation, education and career may be imperiled by an allegation if found true. The words of Sir Own Dixon continue to ring true:

“ …reasonable satisfaction is not a state of mind that is attained or established independently of the nature and consequence of the fact or facts to be proved. The seriousness of the allegation made, the inherent unlikelihood of an occurrence of a given description, or the gravity of the consequences flowing from a particular finding are considerations which must affect the answer to the question whether the issue has been proved to the reasonable satisfaction of the tribunal. In such matters “reasonable satisfaction” should not be produced by inexact proofs, indefinite testimony, or indirect inferences.”

Universities are simply unable to conduct investigations in a manner which provides the required basic fairness and proper attention to due process. As Justice Ann Lyons commented: “It would indeed be a startling result if a committee comprised of academics and students who are not required to have any legal training could decide allegations of a most serious kind without any of the protections of the criminal law.”

At the moment we’re also exploring anti-discrimination cases before the Human Rights Commission making the case that it is young men who are receiving this unfair treatment. But we need more brilliant legal minds to plan future strategies. We can’t just sit back and allow this system to keep destroying young men.

There must also be someone in the media willing to expose the tragic stories of what is happening to young men on our campuses. Surely the whole media industry is not captured by the feminist mafia, or too gutless to take on this important issue. I’m happy to put journalists in touch with the students willing to talk about what happened.

Perhaps it’s worth planning some more talks at universities to draw public attention to the issue – I’m happy to speak if anyone is brave enough to invite me, either to student groups, staff or alumni.  This issue is not going away and neither am I.

Like Comment Share

Thanks for your support for my substack blogs. It’s great if you “like” my blogs and post comments. Please help me reach a wider audience by sending my blogs on to your friends and urge them to sign up.

Share Bettina Arndt

You’re on the free list for Bettina Arndt. If you are able to do so, please consider supporting my work financially and become a paying subscriber. I use these funds to pay skilled people to help with my videos and other work, as well as supporting students facing investigation by the universities’ kangaroo courts.

Subscribe now

Party at club is blasted over £112 ‘man tax’ that charged straight males up to six times more for entry than other guests

Can this be legal?


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Women who make more money than their partner are TWICE as likely to fake orgasms, study shows

Interesting. Needless to say, there’s a dingbat feminist “professor” behind the “study” seeking to make feminist capital out of it. An extract:

The new study has been led by Professor Jessica Jordan, a psychologist at the University of South Florida, and is published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.

‘Women are prioritising what they think their partners need over their own sexual needs and satisfaction,’ said Professor Jordan.

‘When society creates an impossible standard of masculinity to maintain, nobody wins.’

Of course it couldn’t simply be that women tend not to be turned on sexually by men who earn less than themselves, could it? You know, like, a manifestation of deep-seated hypergamy?


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

‘Catcall squad’ of undercover female police officers will walk streets to catch drivers shouting sexist comments at women

The effectiveness of the police is in freefall, and now this. Burglars and other criminals won’t get arrested unless they shout at women from their cars.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan (more books for higher membership levels). Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan personally, you can do so via his PayPal account (mb1957@hotmail.co.uk), his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.