China promotes education drive to make boys more ‘manly’

An interesting piece if you can ignore the BBC’s predictable anti-masculinity propaganda.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

The amendment threatening to derail the domestic abuse bill

Our thanks to Steve for pointing us towards an APPALLING piece by Grant Wyeth for politics.co.uk. Wyeth’s bio on the website:

Grant Wyeth is an academic at the Asia Institute, University of Melbourne and a columnist for the Asia-Pacific affairs publication, The Diplomat. He has a forthcoming journal article in Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly on the phenomenon of Parental Alienation.

The start of his article. which was prompted by Philip Davies’s admirable amendment about Parental Alienation, a common tactic mainly employed by mothers to alienate children against their fathers:

The domestic abuse bill currently before parliament is being watched very closely by domestic abuse support networks throughout the world. It is potentially landmark legislation that could help to alleviate some of the torment and suffering that predominantly women and children experience daily. Yet as the bill entered the committee stage in the House of Lords last week, there is one proposed amendment that could undermine the positive aspects of the bill, making it far more difficult for the family court to fulfil its role to protect children. This is the push to recognise a dubious notion called “parental alienation” as a form of domestic abuse.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Free Speech Union: Weekly News Round-Up

Just received:

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter. This newsletter is a brief round-up of the free speech news of the week sent to our members.

Professor who survived cancellation attempt thanks the Free Speech Union

A few weeks ago, we asked members to sign a Free Speech Union petition urging the President of Chicago University to issue a statement reaffirming his commitment to the Chicago Principles (the gold standard of university free speech policies). This was because an outrage mob were gunning for Dorian Abbott, a professor in the Department of the Geophysical Sciences, who’d committed the sin of criticising positive discrimination. Three days after we started that petition, the University President did exactly what we asked and the mob quickly dispersed. Prof Abbott has written an article about his experience for Quillette in which he thanks us for the support: “Fortunately, at a crucial juncture in the proceedings, the Free Speech Union launched a change.org petition in my support, which was signed by more than 13,000 people. (The list probably includes many readers of this essay. Thank you so much for your support!) My university president, Robert Zimmer, subsequently issued a strong statement defending freedom of expression on campus. As a result, I seem to have survived my cancellation.”

Hate speech

FSU Director of Research Radomir Tylecote writes in Spiked that despite the Home Secretary’s plans to reform hate speech laws, “some of the most extreme demands for censorship now come from quangos the government itself sponsors.” The Law Commission, in particular, wants to expand the number of protected characteristics recognised in law, as well as remove the dwelling exemption that prevents people being prosecuted for things they’ve said in the privacy of their own home. It also seeks to criminalise the sharing of “inflammatory images” – meaning cartoons. This, coupled with the Covert Human Intelligence Sources bill, which would permit children to be used as spies against their parents, is a step towards Stalinism, says Radomir: “There is no greater poison to the human capacity for trust than the knowledge that one’s own child might be a spy.”

Conservative backbench MP Andrew Bridgen makes the case for repealing the UK’s hate speech laws entirely in an interview with Spiked. The core problem, according to Bridgen, is that hate speech laws are “an infringement on free speech”.

An amendment by Scottish Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf to his own Hate Crime Bill has been withdrawn after a backlash from within his own party. The amendment, which said that “behaviours and materials are not to be taken as threatening or abusive solely on the basis that it involves or includes discussion or criticism of matters relating to transgender identity”, prompted younger LGBT members of the SNP to threaten to leave the party. Nicola Sturgeon urged them to stay, while Conservative SNP and convener of the justice committee Adam Tomkins said he was “disturbed by the reaction I have seen to what were modest, innocent amendments”. Yousaf will meet with opposition leaders to draft a new amendment that will address free speech concerns “in a way that also doesn’t make any group feel marginalised”.

Principles to fight cancel culture

Writing in the New York Post, former New York Times editor Bari Weiss offers a reminder that America is still a free country and lays out 10 principles that anyone wishing to fight back against cancel culture can implement immediately. The anti-woke list includes “be honest”, “stick to your principles”, “become more self-reliant” and “trust your own eyes and ears”.

Quillette has published a similar piece by Pedro Domingos, Professor Emeritus of computer science and engineering at Washington University, with a slightly more tactical list for those in the process of being cancelled. Based on his own experience being targeted by the mob for pushing back against an “ideological litmus tests to limit what can and cannot get published”, his set of principles includes “don’t back down”, “mock them mercilessly”, and “turn their weapons against them”. It’s a false equivalency, he argues, to claim we sink to the cancellers’ level by employing such methods: “The cancel crowd tries to ban people because of their views. We try to stop bullying – behaviour that is reprehensible regardless of ideology.”

What cannot get published

Educational psychologists Dr Peter D’Lima and Dr Clare McGuiggan have published a blog post on the importance of free speech in “the cognitive, moral and socio-emotional development” of children, after the official publication of the British Psychological Society, The Psychologist, refused to publish it. Their central argument is that “freedom of speech, exposure to diversity of opinion, and the process of scrutiny and challenge associated with this process is… necessary for children and young people to truly think. Freedom of speech is necessary for the freedom of thought.”

The UK’s longest running gay men’s magazine, Boyz lost the chief sponsor of its annual National HIV Testing Week issue, the Terrance Higgins Trust, after promoting a webinar hosted by the LGB Alliance, “a group that believes in biological sex rather than gender-based public policy”. Even though there are “believed to be around 7,500 people in the UK currently living with HIV who are undiagnosed”, the THT, the UK’s leading HIV charity, said “it is unacceptable to promote an organisation that questions trans equality”. (Needless to say, challenging trans orthodoxy is not tantamount to denying trans rights.) The THT pulled its advertising, ensuring the issue “will not see the light of day (even online)”.

The supremacy of free speech

Facebook’s new Oversight Board, set up as an independent body that can review decisions by the social media platform to censor or ban users, has overturned several such decisions in its first set of rulings. Board member Alan Rusbridger, former editor-in-chief at the Guardian, said: “For all board members, you start with the supremacy of free speech. Then you look at each case and say, what’s the cause in this particular case why free speech should be curtailed?”

MyPillow founder Mike Lindell refused to back down after a number of retailers cut ties with the pillow manufacturer over Lindell’s support of President Trump and his public statements about alleged voter fraud in last November’s election. Corporate America lives in fear of the mob, he argued, but companies that capitulate to the demands of these woke Torquemadas “end up losing, because their real customers are very upset… they’re losing out on the sales from the other stores that have stuck with us. They make the money, and they get the customers.”

New initiatives

Helen Pluckrose, founder of Counterweight, gave an interview to Triggernometry’s Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster in which she explains how her new organisation helps individuals “resist the imposition of the ideology that calls itself ‘Critical Social Justice’ on your day-to-day life”. Counterweight has “a case worker system” which helps people push back against certain forms of ideological intrusion at their place of work or elsewhere in their personal life “in a way that they feel safe to do so, armed with knowledge and principle”. In the same interview, she says the first thing she tells people who contact her is to join the Free Speech Union.

Speaking to LBC’s Iain Dale, Free Speech Champions founder Inaya Folarin Iman articulated the importance of building a network of pro-free speech student activists, saying, “free speech is not inevitable. It’s against all odds and we have to fight for it each day”. Her message was echoed in Spiked in a piece by one of the founding champions, Rob Lownie, who explained that the new organisation existed “to promote healthy discussion and tolerance of different opinions”. Young people interested in becoming free speech champions should visit the website.

Kind regards,

Andrew Mahon


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Comments censorship by The Spectator: “Will the Netherlands’ gender quota experiment work?”

I recently stopped subscribing to The Spectator in protest at their feminist narratives and refusal to publish any substantive counter-narratives. But, truth be told, I’ve missed the magazine otherwise, so I’ve just taken out a new subscription (first four weeks free, then £12.99 pcm for both the print and digital editions).

My eye was caught by an article in the new edition, “Will the Netherlands’ gender quota experiment work? It starts with this:

Quotas are unpopular, especially in the liberal Netherlands. But next week its parliament is expected to impose a quota system to ensure major businesses employ more women at the highest levels.

A law is being tabled in parliament which would force listed companies to have at least a third of women (or, indeed, a third of men) on their supervisory boards. Another 5,000 Dutch companies will need to come up with ‘appropriate and ambitious’ measures for increasing female leadership. Meanwhile a government website now showcases board-ready Topvrouwen (top women) to take up these posts. And, in a real departure from the norm, there will be sanctions: if a listed company doesn’t have enough women on the board, any new male appointee will be rejected, in what is known as the ‘empty seat principle’. Firms will also be required to report gender statistics on a website open to all for scrutiny.

As you might expect, the comments are almost all opposed to the proposed law. Last night I posted some comments on the online version of the article. I immediately had the message that the comments were being moderated, and a few minutes later they disappeared. A short while ago I posted very similar comments, but this time saying that if the comments were removed, I’d post a blog piece here. The screensave of my comments is here.

You can subscribe to The Spectator here (first month free).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

We’re All Terrorists Now – Regarding Men

Interesting (video, 53:45).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Female gambler: ‘I gambled our house away without telling my partner’

Our thanks to Nigel for this. He writes:

Clearly Michelle developed a gambling problem, she used the fact she handled the family finances to hide this from her partner Chris. The end result was she lied and cheated and the family ended up destitute. She wasn’t, of course, arrested and charged for financial abuse of Chris, even though it is he who had to pick up the pieces. And along the way of course there are all sorts of emotional reasons for her gambling and fraud. Now try to imagine the story if it had been lorry driver Chris who had gambled away all the family’s money and constantly lied. We wouldn’t be encouraged to think about his stress over his elderly mother, would we? Nor would Michelle be applauded for going back to Chris to learn to forgive him.

In fact Chris actually isn’t even applauded for his attempts to rebuild the family and forgive Michelle, he has of course simply done the “man up” thing. Taking betrayal on the chin and making the best of the mess.

Indeed the article is all about poor Michelle, really. I note long-suffering Chris and their daughter don’t even get into the happy picture of our smiling heroine Michelle.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

BBC gives the late Roger Scruton’s odious accuser, George Eaton (New Statesman), a platform

A tip of the hat to Gary Oliver for this piece on TCW.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Unedited: Jordan Peterson’s Sunday Times Interview

This piece (audio, 2:48:03) was published on Jordan Peterson’s channel two days ago, the same day we published Decca Aitkenhead’s interview of him in The Sunday Times, to which she predictably brought her customary feminist bias.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Free Speech Union monthly newsletter

The FSU monthly newsletter takes up the remainder of this blog piece:

Inaya Folarin Iman, a Founding Director of the Free Speech Union, is launching a new venture today called the Free Speech Champions Project, along with a group of students and recent graduates. (The Mail on Sunday ran a story about it yesterday.) Below is an extract from the press release.

The Free Speech Champions Project is an exciting new initiative which aims to inspire the next generation about the importance of free speech. It has been set up by a socially and politically diverse group of university students and recent graduates to create a space for challenging thinking. It will do this by creating a network of young ‘free speech champions’ across the country who will host events on free speech, support and encourage the development of free speech societies, and develop the information, ideas and arguments about free speech needed to inspire the next generation. The Champions will collaborate with individuals, groups and organisations who share their commitment to free speech.

The Free Speech Champions Project is led by Inaya Folarin Iman, a 24-year-old graduate of the University of Leeds, and developed in collaboration with the Free Speech Union and the Battle of Ideas charity.

Inaya said: “Freedom of speech is essential for open enquiry to flourish. Social and human progress depends on courageous individuals who are prepared to think for themselves. Too often, the places where free speech should be valued most highly – universities and online spaces – are where it is in most jeopardy. We need to re-articulate why free speech matters, especially to young people.”

A 2020 survey carried out by ADF International revealed that 40% of students self-censor out of concern for their future careers.

Inaya said: “A lot of attention has been paid to the problem of explicit censorship on campus – no-platforming of speakers, the closing down of debates. It is a good sign that a lot of people instinctively feel that this is wrong. However, a more subtle pressure to self-censor has also become far too prevalent in places of education. This is not about being ‘polite’. Too many young people are holding themselves back from exploring ideas because they fear the potentially negative consequences of using the wrong words or of honestly sharing what is on their minds.”

The Free Speech Champions Project will go to where young people most need the space to think and speak freely – schools, universities and online communities – and inspire support for freedom of speech.

Toby Young, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, said: “The Free Speech Union is delighted to be supporting this project, along with the Battle of Ideas charity. If free speech is going to endure it’s essential that young people understand why it matters and needs to be defended.”

You can find out more about the Free Speech Champions Project by visiting its website. And if you’re a student or recent graduate who would like to get involved, please fill out the form on this page.

New Organisation Set Up to Help People Resist Woke Ideology

Another new organisation has just been launched called Counterweight. Started by Helen Pluckrose, co-author of Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity – and Why This Harms Everybody, it aims to help individuals resist the intrusion of woke ideology into their day-to-day lives. Like the FSU, it’s primary purpose is to help people who’ve fallen foul of this ideology, providing resources, advice and guidance, including referring them to the FSU if it thinks we can help. Another of the people involved is Carrie Clark, who wrote the essay about Unconscious Bias Training that we published on our website last September.

This is what it says on Counterweight’s website about the organisation’s care values:

Counterweight is a liberal humanist organisation that values individualism, universalism, viewpoint diversity and the free exchange of ideas. We defend scientific, reasoned, rigorous and empirical approaches to knowledge production and to justice and equality.

Our main focus is Critical Social Justice, though we oppose authoritarianism and censorship of all kinds. We do not support attempts to ban Critical Social Justice ideas. People must have the freedom to believe and advocate whichever ideas they wish. We only ask that they do not force their beliefs on anyone else.

Counterweight works with and for people from all over the political spectrum, with a wide variety of cultural, ethical, religious and philosophical views. Not all of these people identify as liberal humanists.

We do, however, expect them to support equal freedoms, rights and opportunities for all human beings under the law and to view all human beings as equals, regardless of race, gender, sexuality or any other identity category.

If you’d like to find out more – or reach out to Counterweight for help – you can find its website here.

Australian Academic Under Fire for Defending J.K. Rowling

Australian academic and FSU member Dr Petra Bueskens was mobbed on social media last week – and denounced by her professional association – and needs your support. Her sin? Writing the most popular piece of 2020 on Areo, an online magazine, defending J.K. Rowling from trans activists. The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) initially published a tweet warmly congratulating Dr Bueskens on her article, but after some of its members replied with negative comments it deleted the tweet and then published another one, this time apologising for the “hurt” it had caused and denouncing Dr Bueskins for “transphobia”. Needless to say, there was nothing transphobic about Dr Bueskens’ article.

Dr Bueskins has written an open letter to TASA in response that you can read here. She doesn’t pull her punches:

Let me make a bold claim: the confluence of neoliberalism and postmodernism has produced a cadre of academics who lack imagination, passion, flair, originality or courage; they are all in lock-step with each other, more like a school of fish than a cohort of scholars. To my colleagues I say this: honestly, stop pretending you are victims of anything other than your own limbic hijack and petty careerism. Most of you are so busy checking metrics, expanding CV’s, meeting KPIs, applying for grants, attending nauseatingly boring Zoom meetings, self-promoting, networking, virtue signalling and ensuring you support the corporate brand formerly known as the university that there is no time for thinking as an end in itself.

She continues:

Those tenured academics protesting their victimisation and hurt while staying safely inside “the gated institutional narrative” are Orwellian double-speakers. They are neither harmed nor threatened. On the contrary, theirs is the only view allowed! As a normative principle, freedom of speech – especially within academia and the media – is the lifeblood of liberal democratic societies. We are nothing without this capacity to reflect on ourselves, our institutions, our laws and our ideas. Speech is never free: it is both costly and uneven, but upholding its normative value remains critical to the pursuit of truth.

Dr Bueskins is currently an Honorary Fellow in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne, but she doesn’t have a tenured position and there’s a danger her university may withdraw her fellowship if her professional association continues to denounce her. To prevent this happening, some colleagues of hers have written an open letter to TASA asking it to apologise to Dr Bueskins and affirm its commitment to academic free speech. If you would like to sign this letter – particularly if you’re an academic – please email Andrew Glover at theandrewglover@gmail.com.

It seems incredible that we have to mobilise support for someone who is at risk of losing her livelihood because she had the temerity to defend the best-selling children’s author in the world. But that’s 2021 for you.

US Branch of the FSU has been Incorporated

We have always envisioned the Free Speech Union as an international organisation, with branches across the Anglosphere and beyond, and I’m happy to report we’ve now incorporated our first overseas branch in the United States. The plan is to launch it later this year. So far we have a four-person Board of Directors, an acting CEO (not me!) and are in the process of assembling the Advisory Council.

We haven’t set up the website of the US branch yet, but you can register your interest and receive updates about our progress by filing in a form on this placeholder site. If you’re interested in getting involved and would like to volunteer, please email me at info@freespeechunion.us.

FSU Hires New Deputy Research Director

The Free Speech Union has hired Emma Webb as its Deputy Research Director. Emma, a long-standing champion of free speech, is also an Associate Fellow of Civitas and the Co-Founder of Save Our Statues.

Emma recently wrote a piece for Spiked about the involvement of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in an organisation that wants to “eliminate” online hate (e.g. defining a woman as an “adult human female”) and gave an interview to Mike Graham about it on talkRADIO.

If you’d like to contact Emma – with an idea for a policy paper the FSU should publish, for instance – you can reach her on emma@freespeechunion.org.

The Workers of England Union

A quick reminder that if you’re worried you might be put through a disciplinary procedure at work because your beliefs are at odds with your employer’s, you should consider joining the Workers of England Union. The WEU has won tens of thousands of pounds for members whose philosophical beliefs have been discriminated against.

We’ve negotiated a deal with the WEU whereby you can become a member for a fee of £25. Unlike other unions, the WEU will go to bat for its members as soon as they sign up. If you’d like to take advantage of this offer, you can join online here, but don’t forget to email them here first, letting them know you’re a member of the FSU.

Thanks again for becoming a part of the Free Speech Union. 2020 was possibly the worst year in history to launch a new organisation that aims to organise events and speakeasies as part of its mission to encourage people to engage in civil debates about controversial issues in the public square – and the U.K. doesn’t look like it’s going to reopen any time soon. To date, our activities have largely been confined to case work, research and staff recruitment. Nevertheless, we’ve managed to sign up over 8,000 members and, so far, have done a reasonable job of standing up for their freedom of speech.

Kind regards,

Toby Young

—————————-

Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.