Man circumcised in hospital mix-up gets £20k payout

Our thanks to Alan for this. He writes:

I don’t know what to make of it, but one way to look at it is that it puts a value on the damage caused by circumcision for comparison:

Loss of function of leg in leg injury  – ~35k

Loss of middle finger ~£10k

Loss of index finger ~£15k

So circumcision is an injury worse than losing a finger but less than the loss of an eye or permanent disability with a leg injury.
——————-

UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Which would you prefer, a ‘caring’ doctor or a competent one?

A piece by Chris McGovern published today by TCW. An extract:

The University of Manchester has already ditched the traditional requirement for chemistry A-Level for those seeking to study medicine. Psychology A-Level will do instead. [J4MB: 90%+ of those studying Psychology at A-Level, and at degree level are female.] The head of its medical school admissions told the Sunday Times that more liberal entry requirements are now the order of the day in universities. Other universities plan to follow Manchester’s lead.

Much the same is true of engineering degree courses. A-Level physics, the bedrock on which much study for an engineering degree is built, is no longer to be regarded as necessary. Nor should it be, as Bristol University has made clear. A central aim of recruitment to its main engineering degree courses is to ‘increase the diversity of students’. [J4MB: You can be sure that the central aim of recruitment to its main PSYCHOLOGY courses is not to increase the gender diversity of students.] University College London and the University of Southampton are pursuing a similar policy. Both offer engineering courses that do not require physics A-Level.

Nobody should be in any doubt that these changes are being made for one reason only, to increase the proportion of students in these disciplines, who are female. 70 per cent of medical students in the UK are women today, and the consequences for the NHS – and patients – will be dire, as they have been since the feminisation of the medical profession started in the 1970s.


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

You Can’t Make This S*** Up #14: Woman, Thy Name is Privilege

Enjoy (video, 34:51).


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Regarding Men #26 – Feminism Kills in El Paso and Dayton

Interesting (video, 42:57).


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

A letter to the Sunday Times on anonymity for those accused of sexual offences

A letter in yesterday’s paper:

Case for anonymity
In the interests of justice for innocent suspects, there are strong reasons for granting pre-charge anonymity to people accused of sexual offences, especially in cases of alleged historical child sexual abuse.

Suspects in such cases who are publicly named can be exposed to danger from vigilantes. My research has found that those wrongly accused of such crimes are seriously traumatised.

In these cases there is often a deficit of verifiable evidence and instead a reliance on statements. Those not charged are unable to prove their innocence: for the rest of their lives, some people will always be suspicious of them.

Furthermore, naming the accused for the purpose of gaining corroboration from other complainants exposes suspects to miscarriages of justice. Barriers removed for genuine victims make it easier for spurious claims to be made.

It is frequently argued that false allegations are rare. That depends on what is meant by false allegations. Those that are found to be malicious or fraudulent and lead to charges for perverting the course of justice are indeed rare. Those that are unintentionally false — the deluded fantasies of someone with mental health problems, say, or the result of adult reconstructed memories of events in childhood — may never be detected. [J4MB: The writer excludes the large category of allegations which are malicious or fraudulent, but don’t lead to charges.]

These are just some of the reasons that historical sexual offences present unique issues. Certainly, it would be unacceptable if pre-charge anonymity for suspects set the clock back when victims were afraid to report offences, but that seems highly unlikely now that the widespread occurrence of sexual offences is fully acknowledged in a justice system that is much more victim-centric.

Dr Ros Burnett, research associate, Centre for Criminology, Oxford University

You can subscribe to The Times here.


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Sir Richard Henriques, ex-High Court judge, tells police to stop calling people who make sex offence allegations ‘victims’ because it creates a ‘presumption’ that they are telling the truth following bungled ‘Nick’ the fantasist inquiry

Our thanks to Mike P for this.


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Delivering guidance on the sentencing of mothers to safeguard children

Shona Minson is British Academy Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the Centre for Criminology at Oxford University. Her profile is here. She is focused on the impact of maternal imprisonment on children, and appears to have zero interest on the impact of paternal imprisonment on children. Her report on ‘Motherhood as Mitigation’ won the John Sunley Prize 2013 and was published by The Howard League for Penal Reform in April 2014.

My thanks to C, a supporter of the female persuasion, for pointing me to Delivering guidance on the sentencing of mothers to safeguard children. It’s on the website of the Economic and Social Society Research Council, the ESRC (strapline, “Shaping Society”). The main content of the page:

An estimated 312,000 children annually lose a parent to imprisonment in England and Wales. Research on how the sentencing of mothers affects children has changed practice for judges, magistrates and Probation Officers, who now consider how children will be affected by their parents’ sentence.

IMPACTS

  • Dr Shona Minson’s research led to changes in guidance from the National Probation Service on Pre-Sentence Reports. The March 2019 guidance states for the first time that probation officers must request an adjournment for a full Pre-Sentence Report in cases where the defendant has child dependants, to assess the impact on them and to ensure that plans are in place so children are cared for during imprisonment.
  • Dr Minson produced a short film (made in four versions for different audiences) outlining the court’s duty to consider the impact of a mother’s prison sentence on a dependent child. The video was launched in January 2018, and is now embedded in criminal justice training.
  • The Judicial College – responsible for all judicial training – hosts the film on their intranet, and the topic is now included in their sentencing seminars for Crown Court judges and recorders.
  • The film has become part of ongoing, tracked training for all National Probation Service court staff in England and Wales.
  • The films’ content was referenced in the Government’s Female Offender Strategy – a programme of work launched in 2018 to improve outcomes for female offenders.
  • Following Dr Minson’s briefing paper and petition to the parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, it launched an inquiry into the right to family life of children whose mothers are imprisoned. The Committee’s final report will be published later this year.
  • Dr Minson’s work provided key evidence for Lord Farmer’s Review on the importance of family and other relational ties for women in the criminal justice system.

ABOUT THE RESEARCH

An estimated 312,000 children annually lose a parent to imprisonment in England and Wales, and 17,000 are separated from their mother who is often their primary carer. Research by Dr Shona Minson has shown that children with mothers in prison are negatively affected in terms of health, education and wellbeing.

In her PhD research Dr Minson, at the University of Oxford’s Centre for Criminology, examined whether the impact on children is considered when a mother is sentenced in the criminal courts in England and Wales, and whether children’s rights under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child are upheld. Children with mothers in prison, and people who cared for children of imprisoned mothers, were interviewed about their experiences, and Crown Court judges were interviewed about their practice when sentencing mothers of dependent children.

Dr Minson found that children of women sentenced in the criminal courts are treated without the concern given to children separated from their parents in the family courts, where the child’s wellbeing is the paramount consideration of the court. Judges and magistrates are inconsistent in how they consider dependent children, and do not understand how the children are affected when their primary carer is sentenced. Although guidance and mechanisms for considering the welfare of these children exist, they are not routinely used.

Funded by the University of Oxford’s ESRC Impact Acceleration Account, Dr Minson worked with a range of partners – the Judicial College, the Magistrates Association, HM Prisons and Probation Service, the Criminal Bar Association, The Law Society, the Prison Reform Trust and Franks Films – to produce the film series Safeguarding Children when Sentencing Mothers. The four films, which share children’s and carers’ experiences and explains the court’s duties towards the children, target different audiences: sentencing authorities, probation staff, solicitors and barristers, and mothers at risk of imprisonment.

“By ensuring that sentencing authorities consider the rights of children, they will no longer be invisible within maternal sentencing hearings,” says Dr Minson. “There have been cases already where the judge was referred to the case law and the evidence presented in the films, and subsequently decided that the child’s wellbeing meant an immediate custodial sentence for the mother was inappropriate, or should be for the shortest time possible.”


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Lovely Ladies for Men’s Issues 2020 Calendar

Elizabeth Hobson will be appearing in a 2020 calendar, the crowdfunder for which is here. Please donate what you can. The 2018 calendar attracted some mainstream media interest, such as here and here. A related video is here (5:46).

The calendar was the brainchild of Vanessa Lussier (aka Modern Medusa on YouTube), her related website is here.

Elizabeth was engaged in a photoshoot with the legendary photographer / videographer Anthony J Corniche (“Tom”) in a London studio two days ago. Some of the images I’ve seen from that session were outstanding. We’ll be linking to some of them in due course.


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

A boozy night out in Manchester before Laura Hood, 27, decided to ruin a taxi driver’s life… ‘responsible and caring’ woman jailed for false rape allegation

Our thanks to Groan for this.


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Ewan Jones’s new website

Ewan Jones, a regular speaker at Speakers’ Corner, and a very productive video maker, has a well-designed new website – here. He’s one of a number of British MRAs who’ll be travelling shortly to the Chicago conference, where he plans to interview many of the speakers. His video interviews from last year’s London conference are in a playlist on his new channel, here.


UK Men’s Rights Action, our official supporters’ Facebook page, is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.