11 thoughts on “Pankhurst Centre needs public funding, say feminist parasites

    • ‘ … Editor … ‘

      Editress. Feminists masculinise the feminine; there’s no need for men to follow suit, besides which, to award a man’s title to a woman simply because she feels diminished by femininity is nothing more noble than a chivalrous genuflection to the goddess vagina, and degrades it.

      Like

  1. For those really interested in the suffragettes I can recommend “The Suffragette Bombers Britains Forgotten Terrorists ” by Simon Webb. It points out that Mrs Pankhurst did not want votes for women but rather for ladies whose husbands owned property and she certainly did not want working class men to have the vote. I wonder if the suffragette museum makes these points clear.

    Like

      • I once saw a claim, written by a woman, that the suffragettes were fighting for the men in France, even though the husbands of women who could not but have been suffragettes regularly wrote to their broadsheet editors complaining that mutilated men being rehabilitated nearby frightened their wives, daughters and female servants. The suffragette museum won’t record that, nor that many of the under age boys who died in France did so because silly little privileged girls, girls who were all for votes for women, presented them with a white feather in public (some of those boys were as young as fourteen).

        That aside, last year was the centenary of the PDSA. Google Maria Dicken and ask yourself why she was more concerned with the welfare of the pets of the poor than men dying or maimed in France.

        Like

  2. The organisation had a bid for funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund rejected last year, but is in the process of submitting another. Heath said it would take about £3.5m to transform the centre into

    The Pankhurst Centre merged with Manchester Women’s Aid in 2014, providing a mutually beneficial arrangement … ‘

    I’ll bet it’s beneficial. Reform of the ‘third sector’, with audits of all charities receiving tax payers’ money, is a valid MRA objective.

    Like

    • I didn’t know about this. I’m not surprised about the lottery bid as it is pretty inaccessible due to being completely surrounded by the Manchester Royal Infirmary campus. On a practical grounds it probably would be better demolished as the Hospital wants. At the moment it is a run down eyesore.

      Like

  3. I’d love to see someone make a video of a visit to the center and ask to see the exhibits about the campaign of Suffragette terror attacks / terrorists. Also it would be interesting to see how much white feather related content there is documenting the Suffragette sending innocent men to die in battle field and then exploiting the same event for political purposes.

    I wonder how much content there is on the openly fascist Suffragettes too, not to mention those who only wanted the wealthiest women (and men) to have he vote.

    Like

Leave a reply to Groan Cancel reply