Whenever you think Laura Bates couldn’t possibly get more stupid, she’ll surprise you. Sex robots.

Our thanks to Martin for this, a piece about sex robots in yesterday’s Mail on Sunday. An extract:

Last month The Mail on Sunday became the first newspaper to experience Harmony 2.1, the latest version of a sex robot Matt McMullen has been working on since 2014.

Harmony has 30 different faces to choose from, 16 body types, customisable breasts from AA to triple F, 19 different nipple types from ‘perky’ to ‘puffy’, and 11 different types of genitalia.

The robot has 18 different personality types from happy to sensual, shy to talkative.

It is modes such as ‘shy’ which most concern critics, who cite another sexbot as a blatant invitation to ‘normalise’ rape.

Laura Bates, founder of the Everyday Sexism project, said creating a robot willing to have non-consensual sex [J4MB: As opposed to creating a robot unwilling to have non-consensual sex, you daft trout?] ‘is to risk normalising rape but giving it a publicly acceptable face’.

We should no more be encouraging rapists to find a supposedly safe outlet [J4MB emphasis] than we should facilitate murderers by giving them realistic blood-spurting dummies to stab.’ [J4MB: Women being raped and people being killed would apparently be preferable outcomes for this moronic woman.]

This is the narcissistic who the headmaster of Eton College deems suitable to give a talk about gender issues to the pupils.

Realdoll should create a Laura Bates lookalike sex doll, with a marching personality – whiny, 24/7/365. Hmm, I wonder what sales would be like?

5 thoughts on “Whenever you think Laura Bates couldn’t possibly get more stupid, she’ll surprise you. Sex robots.

  1. Years ago I conceived of a dummy head one could connect to a PC which, when the PC crashed or froze for the umpteenth time, would, as one pummelled the living daylights out of it, scream and plead for forgiveness. Now I’m not suggesting any candidates to model the head but, playing devil’s advocate, a certain vacuous and whiny …

    Like

  2. The feminist campaigners in the area of sex often seem divorced from reality. Has Laura Bates ever read women’s boddice ripper fiction. It is full of women taken against their vocal protests who end up married happily to their ‘attacker’. Doe sthsi encourage or noermalise rape? Women often ask their partners to role play the same sor tof scenario. WHy is 50 shades of grey so popular. It is diifuclt to avoid the conclusion that fr Laura it is OK for women to fantasise in this way but not men.

    Like

  3. The reason these barking mad brush daft fruitcakes HAVE to keep excreting risible drivel is that their cupboards are bare, bereft even of bread and cheese they must perforce offer the mouse droppings that alone remain.

       Let them keep on destroying their own credibility, no one believes them anyway.
    

    Unless they happen to be headmasters of of prestigious institutions (for example) who must be either malicious, or gullible retards themselves.

    Like

Leave a reply to Slowcoach Cancel reply