Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, feminist hatchet-faced trout: “The day a married Tory minister invited me to move into his Mayfair pad and service his needs”

Nonsense. At the very least, a fantasy. At worst, an outright lie. An extract:

Let me share my own two stories. I will never name the men because they have wives and children.

10 thoughts on “Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, feminist hatchet-faced trout: “The day a married Tory minister invited me to move into his Mayfair pad and service his needs”

  1. I laughed so hard at ‘allow me to be lookist (sic) for a moment‘ that I couldn’t continue but your quote makes it certain for me that this vile little racist and desperate attention seeker is simply making a pathetic grab for a little more of the rapidly dimming spotlight.

    Like

  2. These dreadful “me too” women cannot bear the thought that they might not have an incident to tell because that would mean that they were unattractive to men, so they have to relate incidents, however inconsequential, or make them up, so that they don’t feel left out of the race. Meanwhile, the alleged rape of Bex Baily has become forgotten, and trivialised – “You were raped?” says Julia Hartley Brewer, “that’s nothing; Michael Fallon once touched my knee.” And thus, unwittingly, the feminists demote rape to a minor and trivial matter while inept flirtation is elevated to yet another crime against the sisterhood.

    Shani Wallis once exposed herself to me. Just saying.

    Like

  3. I continue to be amazed at the trivial nature of these accounts. Over a long career a man propositioned her and and when she declined his offer he accepted it and someone squeezed her leg and stopped when asked. If this really is the worst that can be remembered (and perhaps exaggerated a little) then behaviour at Westminster is generally very good.

    The scary thing is that a career can be destroyed over so little.

    Like

  4. Looked on the BBC “Headlines” page. The screen prints showed many papers had Carl Sargeant’s suicide as front page spread and those that didn’t had it as front page news. And yet no mention in the BBC commentary underneath. Which went on about Priti Patel which was the lead story in only one paper. And didn’t get front page mention on most. One couldn’t get a more stark example of the leanings of the BBC.

    Like

  5. YAB reports two episodes of her having received the unambiguous attention of male admirers: one episode consisting of an inexpert propositioning and the other episode consisting of a clumsy groping. YAB reports having declined these attentions and, having done so, such attentions were discontinued. The triviality of her recollections confirm that they constitute evidence of normal human interaction between the two sexes. Nonetheless, YAB extrapolates wildly from the nothingness of her personal recollection in order to construct an argument that purports to claim (at the conclusion of her article) that ‘our democratic edifice is imperilled’. The argument that YAB has advanced is both dishonest and deviant: she denies agency on behalf of the female protagonist, while insisting upon malign intent on the part of the male protagonist. I find that her argument, like all arguments of this type, is profoundly disingenuous and deceitful. Therefore, I call out YAB as a coward who is deliberately misrepresenting the truth; I call out YAB as a liar.

    Like

  6. Yasmin Alibhai-Brown is beyond a joke she always has been. It should be funny, she should be the laughing stock. She is a sign of what has become of our society. A gloating rich, vain, spoilt, sadistic woman who knows nothing of the real world. Working class white men and boys will find themselves living under even more of these useless parasitic woman in the coming years. It is a return to the feudalism our ancestors lived short miserable lives under.
    Empty vessels make the most noise.

    Like

  7. I have met Yasmin many years ago( about a decade) overseas at a meeting for Muslim women rights NGO( and don’t worry they campaigned for Muslim men as well).

    she was very forthright and straight up about the issues of forced marriages etc not veering onto the gender bandwagon, but staying matter of fact.

    But this article that you linked to, that is no longer the person I have previously met.

    you get a sense of virtue signalling going on there with cues such as “when I was a lone mother”
    or the attack on the Conservative Woman @TheConWom( who I had read many times) as Harridans and appeasers of predatory men

    this was not a matter of fact article mean to examine and debate the issues, but rather a hack piece.
    claiming not wanting to name them for the sake of their wives and children( you have already identified them with a little bit of detective work yasmin and you could have gone to the police), I suspect you have taken legal advice about avoiding legal action for libel.

    the idea that yasmin claimed she reminded the supposed person that she was a journalist is laughable because this virtue signaling piece is a hack piece, the kind that people write when they are becoming “yesterday news” and no longer able to command any kind of respect.

    yasmin, you have become the face of the old untrustworthy media.

    I doubt you, yasmin will be reading the comments about you, but S.I.S.( that NGO that invited you) would be embarrassed to have you associated with them because your standards have severely slipped, and you have just undermined them with your “me too” tag screaming for attention.

    Like

Leave a reply to Roderick antifemnasty Cancel reply