Our thanks to our video man for capturing this, a discussion (11:35) on BBC Radio Nottingham early (too early) last Monday morning. In his hit piece on Football365, Daniel Storey attributed these comments to me:
I spent 30 years in the business world and never once came across an example of women claiming to be sexually harassed. This is women claiming to be sexually harassed, not who have been harassed. If we believe them we are basically saying that men are guilty.
“There are some very unattractive women, including some politicians, who claim sexual harassment. Their claims are not credible. Perhaps they are fantasising.
“It’s usually unattractive women who claim to have been sexually harassed and it is simply not right. If she’s more attractive she’ll get more attention from men so she won’t need to claim things It’s simple.
The section of the file relating to these comments covers 4:18 – 5:36. You will note Storey has added, deleted, and changed words. In short, he’s shown the same low ethical standards he’s exhibited in the rest of his scurrilous article.
Justice for Men & Boys 
I thought I’d pass on Sean Gabb’s thoughts on the current Parliamentary ‘sexual abuse’ allegations.
http://www.seangabb.co.uk/puritan-hypothesis-charlie-elphicke-2017-sean-gabb/
Basically, he views it as an opportunistic adaptation of the classic Cultural Marxists, such as Marcuse and Foucault (he should know, he’s read them all). He sees the people making the allegations, and their allies in society, as a class of new frantically virtue-signalling Puritans. He thinks we’ll have to sack 100,000 people to end this scourge (how on earth are we going to do that?!). But an intelligent and thought-provoking article.
LikeLike
Good job on ridiculing that horrible police woman thug and pointing out that unattractive women won’t be sexually harassed. I think you said something really unPC there and in my view it’s all about moving the goal posts against the feminists, not constantly trying to defend current social norms from feminist attacks if we keep doing that then soon talking to a woman will undoubtedly be considered a hate crime that will result in men being arrested and placed on the sex offender register for decades.
That’s why my comments are the most unPC truths of all (even too unPC for you I notice) because I don’t believe society can function if you do the whole PC thing.
LikeLike
I consider all comments on their merits, in a matter of seconds. Please don’t assume that if I decline to publish any of your comments, or anyone else’s, it has anything to do with those comments’ PC rating. Thank you.
LikeLike
But whenever I have made a paedohysteria bashing comment you have a tendency to censor it, which makes me think it must be too unPC for you. And yet, it’s where all this feminist shit started as part of the 1885 Criminal Law Amendment Act (well also possibly the 1861 Offences Against The Person Act).
First they ban men from talking to children.
And I didn’t stand up, because I don’t talk to children.
Then they ban men from talking to women.
And I didn’t stand up, because I was gay.
Then they ban men from talking.
And I didn’t stand up, because I don’t talk.
Then they came for me and by that time there was no one left to stand up for me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_…
LikeLike
Have you been standing up alongside Mike in the streets covered in fake blood, or with signs, or being arrested, or putting yourself on TV, radio or in print media?
When you do these things you must show some level of restraint to keep the media moguls happy or they will all ban you and your message will be silenced forever.
So if you haven’t done any of these things that Mike so clearly has done for such a long time then I would like to politely suggest you stop with the criticism, when he clearly has to maintain some semblance of acceptance to media, which is one reason why he has chosen to not publish full on radically opposite PC views.
If I had to play in a snake pit with snakes, I would also have to learn how to look and sound like one, even if only for the duration of the interview. This is not selling himself out. They are the gatekeepers and they call the shots.
LikeLike
Fair point, but I think some (including me) get frustrated by the irrational direction that the men’s rights movement is sometimes moving in, there are many good things about this movement, sure, but I’ve met MRAs who really seem to believe in all the paedohysterical nonsense (!) and that sometimes makes me wonder where it’s all going to end up. That’s all.
LikeLike