5 thoughts on “Sarah Vine: The brutal truth – the demise of the stay-at-home mother IS harming children… and I’m as guilty as any working mum”
What is the purpose of feMarxism?
The purpose of feMarxism is to cause as much harm and do as much damage as it can.
Even to children.
What is it’s purpose?
THAT is it’s purpose.
Women will rather neglect and thus harm their children than admit they are not equal to men in terms of physical and mental performance at the workplace.(figures prove that women do not equal men in neither physical nor scientific or creative performance) Men, due to their gentlemen upbringing are too uncomfortable telling women the plain truth straight in the face, and their silence enabled women to believe that they are equal in work performance. Therefore, women are now trying to live up to that expectation and are failing miserably. Fortunately for them, the current society does not want to acknowledge the obvious and the status quo goes on, harming everything and everyone in the process..
Well I’ve no sympathy for the women who’ve made the choices. Though I’ve every sympathy for the children. I’m also ambivalent about the special claims for mothers as these are suddenly very much in evidence when custody and visitation are in discussion (as “stay at home dads have found out in divorces). There is a real divide here evidenced in my own working life in “female dominated” health and care. When working in my conurbations most affluent borough it was pretty clear that most women working had much better paid partners. They tended to treat their jobs as interesting hobbies taking full advantage of flexible working etc. and totally up to date on all the PC “isms”. Subsequently I worked in one of the most deprived boroughs where the women were generally partnered by men in slightly better paid but frequently less secure work. Consequently they worked harder, were much less interested in “isms” and wanted work to pay bills and were clear they’d like to spend more time with their children. They didn’t equivocate about it they were clear work was about money. In other words not all women are the same nor are all men.
At least this author recognises she chooses her path as she could take more time off etc. without losing her home. Time and again its privileged women who call the shots, yet they are as atypical as media impresarios. Its such a clever trick to coopt “all women” into supporting the selfish aspirations of a few privileged women. For when it comes to divorce or indeed sentencing feminists suddenly discover “motherhood” as a lever to get more for themselves. As Mr Philip Davies said “cake and eat it” .
Will the selfish, self centred, egotistical feminists ever see and admit the error of their ways?
Will they stop pushing the idea that some sort of superior fulfilment for women lies only outside the home, in the workplace?
Will they ever stop deluding themselves that ‘the kids are OK, doing just fine’ ?
Will they ever accept the damage and misery they are causing to the Nation’s children?
Babies and children who simply want to be with Mum.
Yet Mum is absent , hour upon hour, each and every day.
Mum is busy strutting her stuff in the workplace, not seeing or hearing her children’s distress.
When will these feminists grow up and realise it’s not all about them or about their careers ?, that there’s something far more important closer to home – their children’s emotional well being.
No child care, no breakfast club, no school, no after school club can replace the
simple pleasure, satisfaction and comfort of being with a loving Mother who puts you first.
Justice for Men & Boys 
What is the purpose of feMarxism?
The purpose of feMarxism is to cause as much harm and do as much damage as it can.
Even to children.
What is it’s purpose?
THAT is it’s purpose.
LikeLike
Women will rather neglect and thus harm their children than admit they are not equal to men in terms of physical and mental performance at the workplace.(figures prove that women do not equal men in neither physical nor scientific or creative performance) Men, due to their gentlemen upbringing are too uncomfortable telling women the plain truth straight in the face, and their silence enabled women to believe that they are equal in work performance. Therefore, women are now trying to live up to that expectation and are failing miserably. Fortunately for them, the current society does not want to acknowledge the obvious and the status quo goes on, harming everything and everyone in the process..
LikeLike
And right on queue http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/pip-wilson/esther-rantzens-comments-_b_18356992.html Another media smuggie illustrates their privileged “bubble”. Because of course we all of us can vary our hours and places of work. So simple you see.
LikeLike
Well I’ve no sympathy for the women who’ve made the choices. Though I’ve every sympathy for the children. I’m also ambivalent about the special claims for mothers as these are suddenly very much in evidence when custody and visitation are in discussion (as “stay at home dads have found out in divorces). There is a real divide here evidenced in my own working life in “female dominated” health and care. When working in my conurbations most affluent borough it was pretty clear that most women working had much better paid partners. They tended to treat their jobs as interesting hobbies taking full advantage of flexible working etc. and totally up to date on all the PC “isms”. Subsequently I worked in one of the most deprived boroughs where the women were generally partnered by men in slightly better paid but frequently less secure work. Consequently they worked harder, were much less interested in “isms” and wanted work to pay bills and were clear they’d like to spend more time with their children. They didn’t equivocate about it they were clear work was about money. In other words not all women are the same nor are all men.
At least this author recognises she chooses her path as she could take more time off etc. without losing her home. Time and again its privileged women who call the shots, yet they are as atypical as media impresarios. Its such a clever trick to coopt “all women” into supporting the selfish aspirations of a few privileged women. For when it comes to divorce or indeed sentencing feminists suddenly discover “motherhood” as a lever to get more for themselves. As Mr Philip Davies said “cake and eat it” .
LikeLike
Will the selfish, self centred, egotistical feminists ever see and admit the error of their ways?
Will they stop pushing the idea that some sort of superior fulfilment for women lies only outside the home, in the workplace?
Will they ever stop deluding themselves that ‘the kids are OK, doing just fine’ ?
Will they ever accept the damage and misery they are causing to the Nation’s children?
Babies and children who simply want to be with Mum.
Yet Mum is absent , hour upon hour, each and every day.
Mum is busy strutting her stuff in the workplace, not seeing or hearing her children’s distress.
When will these feminists grow up and realise it’s not all about them or about their careers ?, that there’s something far more important closer to home – their children’s emotional well being.
No child care, no breakfast club, no school, no after school club can replace the
simple pleasure, satisfaction and comfort of being with a loving Mother who puts you first.
LikeLike