Our thanks to Jeff for this. It starts:
Cambridge has become the first British university to appoint a full-time sexual assault and harassment adviser to help female students [J4MB: Our emphasis] cope with unwanted attention.
It’s a good thing female students never get drunk, nor exhibit inappropriate behaviour, nor focus unwanted attention on male students.
Our thanks to James for this.
Dr Joseph Spitzer is a prominent mohel, a traditional Jewish circumciser. From the Wikipedia page on mohels:
Biblically, the infant’s father is commanded to perform the circumcision himself. However, as most fathers are not comfortable or do not have the training, they designate a mohel. The mohel is specially trained in circumcision and the rituals surrounding the procedure. Many mohalim are doctors or rabbis (and some are both) or cantors and are required to receive appropriate training both from the religious and medical fields.
Traditionally, the mohel uses a knife to circumcise the newborn. Today, doctors and some non-Orthodox mohalim use a perforating clamp before they cut the skin. The clamp makes it easier to be precise and shortens recovery time. Orthodox mohalim have rejected perforating clamps, arguing that by crushing and killing the skin it causes a great amount of unnecessary pain to the newborn, cutting off the blood flow completely, which according to Jewish law is dangerous to the child and strictly forbidden, and also renders the orlah (foreskin) as cut prior to the proper ritual cut.
Under Jewish law, a mohel must draw blood from the circumcision wound. Most mohels do it by hand with a suction device, but some Orthodox groups use their mouth to draw blood after cutting the foreskin. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a warning in 2012 about the health implications of this practice, citing 11 cases of neonatal HSV and two recorded fatalities. A 2013 review of cases of neonatal HSV infections in Israel identified ritual circumcision as the source of HSV-1 transmission in 31.8% of the cases.
Spitzer claims to have circumcised thousands of male minors – most of them, presumably, when they were eight-day-old babies – over his 35-year-long ‘career’.
Last December I had a brief encounter with Spitzer at his clinic in Stamford – here (video, 3:00). Shortly afterwards he was placed on the Known Genital Mutilators Directory – here.
Three months ago I presented papers in Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court, in a bid to bring a private prosecution of Spitzer under the Offences Against the Person Act (1861). Details here.
We recently had a response from a judge at the court. As a consequence, we are now seeking individuals who are prepared to act as witnesses in my private prosecution of Spitzer. They will have no personal liabilities, and will not have to bear any costs in the unlikely event the prosecution is unsuccessful. Key points:
– we’re looking for a number of individuals, to prove a ‘course of conduct’
– they should have a date or range of dates over which they were circumcised, ideally with some documentary evidence
– the place the circumcision took place should be identified
If this bid to track down victims of Spitzer’s crimes is unsuccessful, we shall have to consider alternative options e.g. newspaper advertising asking for victims to come forward. The Jewish Chronicle refused to publish such an advertisement. Quelle surprise. And we shall post leaflets door-to-door in Stamford Hill, where Spitzer works, where there is a large population of Haredi Jews. Golders Green, too.
We plan to hold Spitzer accountable for the thousands of crimes he’s committed against innocent male minors, then we’ll focus on other genital mutilators, of all faiths and none.
We’ve started a ‘Comedy Corner’ which will be a permanent presence on the Key posts page. We invite you to email us (info@j4mb.org.uk) with your personal favourites, so we can consider adding them. They’ll be in title alphabetical order – we’ll have no anarchy on the J4MB website. Enjoy:
A harrowing (and hilarious) tale of an all-female workforce
Adolf Hitler starts to doubt his own insanity, after being exposed to Julie Bindel
Big Red makes a compelling case for feminism
Bill Burr: ‘There is NO reason to hit a woman!’
Gender Studies – An Introduction
Harriet Harman, David Cameron, and some other pieces in ‘The Daily Mash’
Hot Crazy Matrix – a man’s guide to women
Interview of Wilhelmina Ballbreaker of the feminist charity, ‘Equality for Women’
Our thanks to Martin Scherer for this:
My path crossed Harman’s when I was the SDP’s Peckham organiser, so I know at least that part of Harman’s autobiography is ‘conveniently’ written.
We knew the sitting Labour MP was terminally ill, so we faced a by-election. However, Harman seemed totally ignorant even though she had already been selected to replace him. Instead, Harman decided to get pregnant (her words) and go to France on holiday.
We also knew Harman was unmarried pregnant and yes we considered using that in the campaign but that was the dirty tactic of Labour’s left, which Harman also describes in her book, and the very reason the SDP had parted from Labour. So, we didn’t.
We also didn’t because that was the 1980’s, not the 1950’s. Peckham had thousands of unmarried mothers and shot-gun marriages. Attacking Harman for being the same as many voters would merely boost her vote. So again, we kept off the topic.
Before the campai gn proper started, Harman decided to save her blushes at being called an unmarried mother – in ‘labour’ for labour. Harman and Dromey married discretely. No in-laws, no celebration. Again her description.
Don’t feel sorry for Jack Dromey. My experience of him was a bully with short man syndrome who threatened me at the count for forcing his marriage to Ms Harman. In her acceptance speech, Harman attacked the SDP for a sin of which she was guilty, but the SDP had kept quiet.
Of the three candidates, Taverne (SDP) Redwood (Cons) and Harman, I judged Harma n had the greatest opportunity to progress. Having won a ‘safe seat’, a stone’s throw from Parliament, Harman was well qualified – a solicitor – and very attractive. Like it or not, good looks are an asset in politics. Maybe she would become another Barbara Castle? Maybe even Labours 1st. female PM?
As labour’s old guard died off or retired, Harman rose like flotsam through the party ranks all the way to the top. However, Harman never took one of the great offices of state. Why?
Harman tells us in her biography. Once elected, she considered her job to be fighting for women’s rights, justice, and defeating Thatcher. That’s not the role of an MP, who is bound to serve the people – all of them. Not just half of them. What would she do when women’s rights were achieved, when Thatcher inevitable resigned?
Labour has always been in the clutches of the far left. The nasty left. Thrown out by Kinnock, a very brave politician, the nasty left re-emerged after Blair. I may not vote for Labour, even Blair, but without an effective decent opposition, democracy does not work. Whatever your view at the time, look at the disaster that Iraq became and Brexit could.
Just as the Conservatives always need someone to save them from naked, exploitative, capitalism, Labour always needs someone to provide strong rational leadership, to save Labour from the negative politics of opposition for opposition’s sake, from the ugly politics of envy. When disaster looms, that’s what men do. As Kinnock did. Take charge of the helm even when they fear there is no hope. Risk their careers, their lives, save the women and children first. In these equal days, why not a woman? Why not Harman? A woman who asserted women were just as capable as men and the job of political leader requires no great physical strength.
Harman could have stepped into role. Harman was made party leader, not once but twice. Each time refused to be any more than a caretaker until a man came along to risk his head above the trenches.
Why? Ms Harman, could have been Labour’s Thatcher, Israel’s Golda Meir, Germany’s Angela Merkel. Why not?
Again Harman’s biography tells us. It was always someone else’s fault. Another pregnancy. The truth is Harman’s glass ceiling was self-imposed as it is with most feminists. Harman’s autobiography is appropriately titled ‘A woman’s Work’
Don’t feel sorry for Jack Dromey. A Labour leftie, who screamed the politics of envy whilst living very comfortably on the backs of workers, as Labour’s Bessie Braddock put it. He also took a safe comfortable job at the tax-payer’s expense. MP for Birmingham constituency, Dromey has survived many scandals. Cash for peerages, illegal political donations, and failure to declare income. Dromey and Harman live in leafy Suffolk.
Politicians are always self-serving. Feminism is a social class politics. Feminists are self-serving politicians.
This website was suspended recently by its American hosting company, following our publication of three blog pieces concerning a 12-year-old Muslim boy in Coventry who didn’t want to be circumcised, and had gone onto a Reddit thread to say so. We assume (but cannot be sure) that the suspension resulted from a complaint by Dr Altaf Mangera, the man who was to perform the circumcision. He’ll soon be joining the AVfM Directory of Known Genital Mutilators, and we’ll provide a link to that piece.
We’ve just had this website transferred to a robust hosting company. Herewith the three blog pieces:
Help us try to stop the circumcision of a 12-year-old boy in Coventry today
MGM appointment in Coventry cancelled
A response to our blog pieces by QC Clinic, Coventry
Muslim arguments against MGM are outlined on the website Quranic Path.
Our thanks to Martin for this. The start of the piece:
A woman paedophile has been jailed for four years after luring a 13-year-old boy into her home and forcing him to have sex with her.
The boy, then a virgin, cried as he was pinned down by 33-year-old Nicola Fox.
She lured the youngster into her home in Hull by saying she wanted a’chat’, then when he tried to leave she closed the curtains and pulled him onto her bed.
The boy stood to leave again, but she sexually assaulted him, ‘slammed’ the door and then put a table up against it, Hull Crown Court heard.
Claire Holmes, prosecuting, said: ‘She pinned him down to the bed using her weight. She was touching his chest and she removed her trousers and lower clothing.’
Fox then held the boy’s hands over his head and forced him to have sex.
Miss Holmes added: ‘He was clear that he didn’t want her to do this. He was telling her to stop, to get off.
‘He was crying at one point. Her response was to tell him to stop crying, and she said that in an annoyed and aggressive tone. He felt annoyed, upset and embarrassed.’
The boy believes the ordeal, which happened earlier this summer, lasted five to ten minutes. He went home and showered but did not report it immediately…
Despite his anguish, the victim had treated Fox with ‘dignity’ during the sex because of she is a woman, the court heard.
Miss Holmes said: ‘[He] said although he tried to fight her off, he was conscious of the fact he was being assaulted by a female and he didn’t want to cause her any harm.’
If the story were of a man doing a similar thing to a 13-year-old girl, I expect he’d serve at least four times the prison sentence.
As in most such cases, there’s an attempt at a mental health issue mitigation:
Dale Brook, mitigating, said: ‘It is difficult to understand or believe that her first conviction can be for such a serious offence in the terms as outlined by my learned friend.
‘Perhaps the only obvious explanation for it is contained in the pre-sentence report, and it is clear that she was suffering from profound mental health problems at the time.’
Fox had been hearing ‘multiple voices’ around the time of the attack.
‘She’s not saying the voices told her to do this?’ said Recorder Richard Woolfall.
‘That’s not in the report, no,’ said Mr Brook. [J4MB: The defence team missed a trick there. In future similar cases we can be sure women will say they were being told by ‘voices in their heads’ to assault underage boys. Who could prove they were lying?]
Ah, the gentler sex. Our thanks to William for the piece. Both these women should be in prison. They will have learned nothing from their trial, other than that they are above the law, because vagina.
Our thanks to Stu for this. An excerpt:
Ms Harman, who has campaigned for longer periods of paid maternity leave in the UK, said a policy of six months’ paid leave would put MPs in line with the civil service.
The former Labour deputy leader said MPs should be able to nominate a full-time paid “maternity cover” to represent the constituency in their absence.
The obvious conclusion to be drawn from this is that we need more female MPs of child-bearing age.
Did Hattie have over-indulgent parents, who gave her whatever she wanted when she pouted and stamped her feet, as a child? Probably, and they must therefore shoulder much of the blame. At 67 Hattie’s still acting like a spoiled little brat, all too used to getting her own way. You have to feel sorry for her long-suffering husband Jack Dromey MP. Hattie didn’t campaign for an all-women shortlist when he wanted to become an MP. In his shoes (shudder!) I’d be saying with monotonous regularity:
Harriet, dear, would you like some cheese with that whine?
A blog piece from 2014, with a link to her Whiny Feminist of the Month award, is here.
Our thanks to William for this.
Justice for Men & Boys 