Appalling. An extract:
“I don’t see how we can proceed without women on the committee. [J4MB: A serious lack of imagination on Lamb’s part.] It sends out a dreadful message at a time when we need to convince far more girls to pursue Stem subjects. [J4MB: Why do we ‘need’ to?] We will not be effective as a committee,” he said.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Normal Lamb MP may be a blithering idiot but he is correct.
Boys dominate science, maths, and computing by 4 to 1 of more.
Girls dominate Art, English, Drama, and religion.
If more girls did science, we’d get more decisions based on fact and suffer less decisions based on drama and belief.
One way to achieve that is get more women MPs to recognise the education system they run is failing society and leading to strident blind feminism.
LikeLike
Thanks Martin. Where to start? OK, here goes:
A majority of undergraduate students studying STEMM subjects today are women, as William Collins has pointed out http://mra-uk.co.uk/?p=731. The idea there’s a ‘need’ for more women to go into STEMM subjects was always, and remains now, a feminist ideological construct.
Boys dominate in the intellectually most difficult disciplines, girls in the least difficult. In large part, possibly, a manifestation of the sexes’ different work ethics – Dr Catherine Hakim’s Preference Theory (2000).
My hunch is that only a small proportion of female MPs studied STEMM subjects, and I see no evidence that those who did study STEMM are any more likely to make rational decisions, when female privileging is an irrational option.
Political decisions with a gender element are very rarely based on fact. They are based on the objective of privileging women and girls over men and boys, regardless of the cost.
Female MPs – Justine Greening, the lesbian Education Secretary and Minister for Women & Equalities, being a notorious example – don’t give a damn about the education system failing society. They care only for female privilege. The education gender gap has been around for 30 years, since the replacement of O Levels by GCSEs in 1987/8, and the government doesn’t give a damn. William Collins again http://mra-uk.co.uk/?p=121.
LikeLike
Well, I don’t need any scientific evidence from research, surveys or studies to work out the differences between men and women. All I need to do is look back into history.
There is one aspect of this whole argument that few people like to mention, because they either deem it disrespectful to women or they are afraid of being vilified for saying such a thing. BUT……, being the Ogre as I am, I really don’t give a toss what people say about me, so I just blurt stuff out just the same.
The one main reason, and I believe it to be an undeniable biological FACT, that women do not flood into STEMM subjects then excel in industry at the same level as men have always done, is purely because they lack the same brain power men are naturally endowed with.
This is one of those uncomfortable truths that no one likes to verbalise, because all the idiots out there like to scream you down. I just laugh at them and fart in their general direction.
Let’s just do the simple numbers and look at history.
Humans have been going on this Earth for a few thousand years right? And we have progressed from wielding clubs and living caves, to driving motor cars, flying planes and living in complex houses. Then there is all the millions and millions of different inventions that have occurred throughout these tens of thousands of years that no one can list now, because the list is far too big.
How many of those inventions were thought of, drawn up, then constructed and put into use, by women? By ONLY women?
Well, my half comatose mash potato that sits inside my head would say virtually none and that it has all been done by men. But, I’m not an encyclopedia, nor am I an academic, so I can’t truly say it was all men. BUT, I won’t be far off being spot on!
Biologically, this is where men excel. It is not in the make up of women to operate at this level or in this area. And by level, I am not actually saying it is any higher or lower. It is just a figure of speech.
You see, stupid women have swallowed the vomit from feminists that have them all measuring themselves off of the abilities of men. Now I don’t normally swear, but to that I have to say, WTF!
Why would these idiot women do such a thing?
If I were a woman, I would never measure myself off of any men, no matter who they were.
As a man I have never and never will measure myself off of a woman.
Women, all 98+% have allowed themselves to be so brainwashed by femtards that they now devalue all the abilities and attributes that women are biologically endowed with.
Can they not see (putting aside their childbearing ability) that they are the builders of society?
Can they not see that without their fine tuning networking that no society on this planet in the history of Mankind would have survived out of the cave man era?
Sure men can network and create society. The problem is, we use large nuts and bolts and don’t really have any finesse, so if one part fails, often times the whole bloody thing needs reworking.
Women on the other hand, stitch it together a lot like a spider web. If one bit fails, there is a myriad of supporting parts that keeps society tight and running smoothly.
This work, along with their ability to clothe the bones of human beings in flesh, is not just miraculous, it can often times look like magic. They do it so well that most men can’t work out how they get things done.
So women create and run society, and men feed, clothe, house and protect it!
How can women, yes all 98+% of them, be so stupid and idiotic that they now believe all those abilities they biological own are superfluous and useless, so they have to measure their worth by trying to mimic men?
I am at a loss. Because now we see all societies around the globe collapsing, because women have abdicated their rightful jobs and places. It is like a ship without a rudder and sails. We are floundering and about to be sunk.
My only thought that comes to mind is that maybe women are not as intelligent as we have been led to believe. Now, I don’t want to believe that, but heck, you have to be pretty downright stupid and dumb to believe the crap that femtards spew out. Yet, the overwhelming majority of women out there bar just a tiny % actually believe almost everything feminists have told them.
Women will never equal men in these fields. If women ever had the same abilities as men, all throughout history there would be examples of their skills in invention, building and constructing. There aren’t any. Or hardly any.
Leaves me in a bit of a quandary as to how we are going to save Western Culture, to be honest!
LikeLike
‘If more girls did science, we’d get more decisions based on fact and suffer less decisions based on drama and belief.‘
Non sequitur, and I hope the grammar and vocabulary of those girls studying English is better than yours. That admittedly cheap shot aside, how so? Girls prefer feelings based subjects such as those you cite precisely because they don’t rely on ‘facts’ so moving girls from the feelings rich subjects they prefer to the feelings lite (another cheap shot – forgive me) and logic saturated STEM subjects can only result in fewer (not ‘less’) decisions based on ‘fact’, rather than fewer based on drama and belief.
LikeLike
Obvious isn’t it.
Sinister intentions to twist and misconstrue also obvious.
LikeLike
‘Sinister intentions to twist and misconstrue also obvious.‘
I think that was true, several decades ago, however, I think that now they’re simply programmed and don’t know what they’re doing, they have no particular intention; they’re useful idiots, as Lenin described them.
LikeLike
There was an MP called Lamb,
who got himself all in a jam,
his principles mixed,
his arguments nixed,
by supporting a sham and a scam.
Well, that’s the Serious Comment taken care of,
now for the witty jibe!
‘Lib Dem Lamb’ – no surprise there – may well be a Blithering Idiot, but there’s worse yet.
Unforgivably, he takes US for idiots too.
That’s the real slap in the chops that consigns him to flying Numpty Class.
In substituting mere bandwagoning for actual belief, he’s blown Himself out of the water in a way that means nothing he says need be taken seriously again.
Thanks for making that so clear Norm mate, it’s very fair minded of you to flag up your own slimey starter level deceit like that.
We appreciate the satire of a Lamb taking Itself to the Slaughter…
LikeLike
He is also an untrustworthy person. In terms of his role as a constituency MP I had frequent occasion to compare him with Charles Clarke. You knew exactly where you stood with the latter and any information you gave him in confidence was treated as such.
Not so with Mr Lamb.
LikeLike