10 thoughts on “Parents remove son from school in pupil gender row”
I would be very interested to see some year on year figures for homeschooling both in terms of location and in terms of stated reasons. It’s a valid option for those who cannot afford private education, where they simply would not accept children, or more likely mothers, with problems of this nature.
I would expect to find “diversity ” in some way or other behind many homeschooling decisions.
‘Diversity’ is a sham, a scam, a fiction, a smokescreen, a tissue of misdirection, dissembling and, a weapon.
And weapons are used as a means to an end.
The cultural marxists behind the official power structure have already started to prepare for the banning of home schooling. A recent ‘terrorist’ incident – as ‘reported’ by the mainstream media – indicated the that the ‘terrorist’ in question had been home-schooled. The direct claim being that home-schooling is creating alienated people.. people who are outside ‘normal’ ‘acceptable’ social norms.
Watch this space. The Cultural Marxists are using ‘diversity’ laws to confuse and polarise the population in order to then impose conformity.
(You understand my use of quotation marks when discussing ‘terrorists’..?).
When defending oneself from intellectual attack on ideological grounds it is absolutely essential to avoid using one’s enemies’ descriptions of one’s utterances and actions or their representation of one’s opinions. The moment one denies the charge one accepts its validity, just as parole cannot be granted to an innocent man wrongly convicted if he maintains his innocence.
That aside, those accused might profitably ask those who accuse them what they mean by ‘transphobia’, which I can only translate, with my always abysmal Latin, as a fear of transport or travel, much as homophobia is to me an irrational fear of the same meal, journey to work, routine etc. at the same time on the same day of every week. I know that ‘trans’ to a chemist means two things in opposition about a common axis but I cannot see what axis those of us who do not accept the prevailing ‘wisdom’ on sex and sexuality share in common with those who oppose us.
You say: “When defending oneself from intellectual attack on ideological grounds it is absolutely essential to avoid using one’s enemies’ descriptions of one’s utterances and actions or their representation of one’s opinions..”
This is very true.. you validate their lies if you allow yourself to be drawn into discussion about the content of those lies.
Worth remembering. Thanks.
The schools are becoming little more than political agenda projects that have nothing to do with children’s real education or their best interests. The parents are beginning to notice.
The aim of Cultural Marxism – of which feminism (feMarxism) is a branch – is no less than to gain power by Any Means Necessary.
If one means fails, they’ll try another.
Economic Marxism failed, so now we have Political Correctness – Cultural Marxism.
The tactic is to turn everything upside down, and back to front.
Thus everything falls out of place, and ceases to connect and thus ceases to function.
What better way to do this than to turn men and women against each other on a falsehood, and confuse and destabilise the weakest members of that society, it’s children.
All the big facts are simple.
It’s the detail that confuses.
You are exactly correct Slowcoach.
Removing heterosexual men (and women actually) from positions of authority is part of the long term plan : blur the lines.. compromise integrity, dilute the enemy foundation. The children are a primary target: get them confused and disintegrated as children so that as adults they are compulsively fluid, non-opinionated and compliant.. When you can see it for what it really is, it is very sinister.
Spread the word.
Cultural Marxism.
Many small boys like dressing up as Spiderman. Perhaps this school would accept one such boy wearing his Spiderman outfit to school every day…
“Look everyone.. here comes Spiderman!!.. Good Morning Spiderman!” – said the teacher as Spiderman swooped across the room to perch on her desk as usual. “Thank you children, for sitting so nicely on the carpet!… and Spiderman? – Thank YOU for perching so nicely on my desk! GOOD Spiderman!”
Confused? you will be..
so it’s not actually funny.
Here’s a point.
The teaching of this ‘transgender/gender-fluid’ stuff in schools is usually justified in the name of combating bullying.
However, children obviously cannot be bullied for something about themselves that their fellow pupils don’t know about them, and children can’t be identified as ‘transgender’ (or ‘gender-fluid’, or whatever) unless they actually openly claim (or ‘self-identify’, to use the jargon) to be, or openly and deliberately act in a way (such as when a boy wears girl’s clothes) which amounts to making such a claim about themselves.
I spent 13 years in school, followed by 3 years in university, and in all that time never heard even a rumour to the effect that any of my fellow pupils or fellow students was ‘transgender’, and, consequently, no one was ever bullied for that reason.
Those grossly irresponsible adults, pushing their pet ideological agendas and obsessions in schools and elsewhere, who encourage young and impressionable children openly to ‘self-identify’ as being ‘transgender’, or whatever, are the ones who are actually responsible for leaving such children open to bullying. (Of course, this also gives these adults an excuse for pushing their agendas even further in the name of combating bullying.)
Justice for Men & Boys 
I would be very interested to see some year on year figures for homeschooling both in terms of location and in terms of stated reasons. It’s a valid option for those who cannot afford private education, where they simply would not accept children, or more likely mothers, with problems of this nature.
I would expect to find “diversity ” in some way or other behind many homeschooling decisions.
LikeLike
Yes Elizabeth, you are right.
‘Diversity’ is a sham, a scam, a fiction, a smokescreen, a tissue of misdirection, dissembling and, a weapon.
And weapons are used as a means to an end.
LikeLike
The cultural marxists behind the official power structure have already started to prepare for the banning of home schooling. A recent ‘terrorist’ incident – as ‘reported’ by the mainstream media – indicated the that the ‘terrorist’ in question had been home-schooled. The direct claim being that home-schooling is creating alienated people.. people who are outside ‘normal’ ‘acceptable’ social norms.
Watch this space. The Cultural Marxists are using ‘diversity’ laws to confuse and polarise the population in order to then impose conformity.
(You understand my use of quotation marks when discussing ‘terrorists’..?).
LikeLike
When defending oneself from intellectual attack on ideological grounds it is absolutely essential to avoid using one’s enemies’ descriptions of one’s utterances and actions or their representation of one’s opinions. The moment one denies the charge one accepts its validity, just as parole cannot be granted to an innocent man wrongly convicted if he maintains his innocence.
That aside, those accused might profitably ask those who accuse them what they mean by ‘transphobia’, which I can only translate, with my always abysmal Latin, as a fear of transport or travel, much as homophobia is to me an irrational fear of the same meal, journey to work, routine etc. at the same time on the same day of every week. I know that ‘trans’ to a chemist means two things in opposition about a common axis but I cannot see what axis those of us who do not accept the prevailing ‘wisdom’ on sex and sexuality share in common with those who oppose us.
LikeLike
You say: “When defending oneself from intellectual attack on ideological grounds it is absolutely essential to avoid using one’s enemies’ descriptions of one’s utterances and actions or their representation of one’s opinions..”
This is very true.. you validate their lies if you allow yourself to be drawn into discussion about the content of those lies.
Worth remembering. Thanks.
LikeLike
The schools are becoming little more than political agenda projects that have nothing to do with children’s real education or their best interests. The parents are beginning to notice.
LikeLike
The aim of Cultural Marxism – of which feminism (feMarxism) is a branch – is no less than to gain power by Any Means Necessary.
If one means fails, they’ll try another.
Economic Marxism failed, so now we have Political Correctness – Cultural Marxism.
The tactic is to turn everything upside down, and back to front.
Thus everything falls out of place, and ceases to connect and thus ceases to function.
What better way to do this than to turn men and women against each other on a falsehood, and confuse and destabilise the weakest members of that society, it’s children.
All the big facts are simple.
It’s the detail that confuses.
LikeLike
You are exactly correct Slowcoach.
Removing heterosexual men (and women actually) from positions of authority is part of the long term plan : blur the lines.. compromise integrity, dilute the enemy foundation. The children are a primary target: get them confused and disintegrated as children so that as adults they are compulsively fluid, non-opinionated and compliant.. When you can see it for what it really is, it is very sinister.
Spread the word.
Cultural Marxism.
LikeLike
Many small boys like dressing up as Spiderman. Perhaps this school would accept one such boy wearing his Spiderman outfit to school every day…
“Look everyone.. here comes Spiderman!!.. Good Morning Spiderman!” – said the teacher as Spiderman swooped across the room to perch on her desk as usual. “Thank you children, for sitting so nicely on the carpet!… and Spiderman? – Thank YOU for perching so nicely on my desk! GOOD Spiderman!”
Confused? you will be..
so it’s not actually funny.
LikeLike
Here’s a point.
The teaching of this ‘transgender/gender-fluid’ stuff in schools is usually justified in the name of combating bullying.
However, children obviously cannot be bullied for something about themselves that their fellow pupils don’t know about them, and children can’t be identified as ‘transgender’ (or ‘gender-fluid’, or whatever) unless they actually openly claim (or ‘self-identify’, to use the jargon) to be, or openly and deliberately act in a way (such as when a boy wears girl’s clothes) which amounts to making such a claim about themselves.
I spent 13 years in school, followed by 3 years in university, and in all that time never heard even a rumour to the effect that any of my fellow pupils or fellow students was ‘transgender’, and, consequently, no one was ever bullied for that reason.
Those grossly irresponsible adults, pushing their pet ideological agendas and obsessions in schools and elsewhere, who encourage young and impressionable children openly to ‘self-identify’ as being ‘transgender’, or whatever, are the ones who are actually responsible for leaving such children open to bullying. (Of course, this also gives these adults an excuse for pushing their agendas even further in the name of combating bullying.)
LikeLike