11 thoughts on “Ms Alex O’Brien, an Australian ‘feminist, not the fun kind’, is a blithering idiot. She owns a Melbourne cafe (Handsome Her) which charges men 18% more than women ‘to address the gender pay gap’, and gives female customers priority seating”

1. Can you imagine what kind of total cuck you would have to be to patronize this joint?

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • Spot on.

     LikeLike

     Reply

2. I’d demand 18% extra on my plate and in my cup.

   LikeLike

   Reply

3. I wonder what sort of outrage would ensue if a pub charged women more than men due to the tax gap. We could also charge women more because they live longer. It would certainly be a great way to never serve a feminist customer (cuckstomer?) again. Hooray!

   Also, from the pictures I’ve seen of this Café, whatever this woman classes as “priority” seating must be pretty rubbish.

   

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • I see a cafe with what appears to be less than a dozen seats. No wonder she needs priority seating!
     What a nutjob.

     LikeLike

     Reply

4. She is relying on feminist bigotry to attract and keep clientele so let’s hope that she goes out of business.
   The unconscious irony of rule #3 is priceless. Respect goes both ways, but if you’re a man you can go to the back of the queue and pay more for poorer service.

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • Feminists don’t get that irony.

     LikeLike

     Reply

   • Have you seen the google reviews for this place? Apparently the staff are all grumpy and irritable.
     But then what do you expect from feminists?

     LikeLike

     Reply

5. This is clearly illegal. So why isn’t Ms O’Brien being sued, or charged with a crime?

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • Its not a compulsory charge.

     LikeLike

     Reply

6. I watched an interview with Ms Alex O’Brien in which she stated the 18% overcharge is not compulsory, she was hoping that men would go along with sympathy.

   Otherwise as we all know such action is a clear breach of discrimination laws.
   I would be curious to know how she would deal with a transgendered/non binary person( would she accept their gender if it meant no extra charge ?).

   I would go as far as to say that the law of economics will triumph over this. People are amazingly fickle when it comes to putting their money where their mouth is.

   In the end its a silly stunt like so many we hear about it.

   isn’t it wonderful to virtue signal without actually giving up your time, resources or money to whatever cause you believe in…

   LikeLike

   Reply