8 thoughts on “Amanda Tompkins, ‘sex mad’ mother, 39, had sex with underage schoolboys while her youngest children were also in her home, telling one she was pregnant with his child. Jailed for seven years as judge labels her a ‘disgrace’”

1. no descriptions as ‘rapist’, ‘abuser’ ,’predator’ or anything ? why do they only label male offenders like that ? Seems female predators have another glass ceiling to break…but they are not so interested in breaking this ceiling, surprisingly…. I dare to guess there are now more female teachers engaging in sex with underage male students than there are male teachers doing the same with female students. Female teachers have broken the glass ceiling !

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • One can only agree Marty, but by the wording of the law only males CAN rape, since the alledged perpetrator has to posess a part of the anatomy particular to males…

     LikeLike

     Reply

     • Hi Slowcoach, engaging in sex with an underage person, regardless of gender, is called statutory rape and applies to female offenders regardless. Furthermore, there was not one mention of the usual name calling as practiced for male perpetrators, such as sexual predator, etc.. looks like the entire penal code needs complete overhaul. Men’s attitudes towards women also need a complete overhaul. We can not continue treating our women as if we live in Victorian times, while our women completely abandoned the mannerism of that era. It takes two to tango, but in today’s west men are attempting to tango alone. it’s ridiculous. There comes a time when even the most entrenched tradition needs updating or adjustment. Time is high for men to do just that now.

       LikeLike

     • Personally, I’d prefer going back to the Victorian standards.

       LikeLike

     • Lawrence, I would too. But for that to happen,women would need to go back to being girlfriends, wives ,mothers and housewives.
       Unfortunately, that is less realistic than simply hardening men’s attitudes towards women, hold them fully accountable for their crimes. At least until they volunteer to return to the roles they played in Victorian times. But for now, they deserve to be held fully accountable and to the same degree men are, for the sake of the equality they so demand. They have abandoned the Victorian etiquette and as such do not deserve to be treated with the same degree of courtesy they did before.

       LikeLike

     • Marty, you say it’s more realistic to ‘simply’ harden men’s attitudes towards women, holding them fully accountable for their crimes. How’s your campaign going in that area?

       LikeLike

     • I suspect your’e right. The vast majority of people are conditioned to see egalitarianism as unquestionably a good thing and anyone who disagrees with the official narrative, e.g. ‘all women were oppresses throughout histroy’, etc., is regarded as reactionary, backward, primitive and morally bankrupt.

       I doubt it’s something that can be solved by means of a revolution led by people like us, because there aren’t enough ‘non-normies’ to get behind us. So we shall have to allow it to play out. The truth will out.

       LikeLike

     • So the law sees pre op transsexuals as men then?

       LikeLike