FlexFitness2, Dudley, attacks MRAs for holding them to the law! Breaching sec 26 & 27, Equality Act 2010 – victimisation!

An amazing response from someone working for the gym, following MRA demands that it charges men and women the same for membership… as it must, under the law.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

5 thoughts on “FlexFitness2, Dudley, attacks MRAs for holding them to the law! Breaching sec 26 & 27, Equality Act 2010 – victimisation!

  1. He’s missing the point. I don’t think any MRA opposes them doing this in principle, as long as businesses were able to choose to give discounts to men only. But they aren’t. Just like women only establishments of various kinds exist without challenge while male only establishments aren’t allowed.

    Like

    • Lawrence, certainly up until few years ago there were men-only bath houses in London. I think the distinction is along the lines of offering membership to both sexes but discriminating in some way against one sex. As in golf clubs allowing women into the club room but not on the course – or the other way around.

      Like

      • I think every golf course should be allowed to be men-only, whether it’s in the club room, the course or both.

        Like

      • I think they are – at least if they’re private members clubs – but as with Muirfield recently, they’re spineless.

        Like

  2. Were I living in the area and interested in joining a gym I would not join one staffed by the likes of See ‘ur (sic) a prick’ Sudi.

    As more and more men take the red pill fewer and fewer will be prepared to be exploited in such ways and places that discriminate against men are going to go out of business quickly when they have to rely on women paying their costs.

    Oh happy day.

    Like

Leave a reply to William Gruff Cancel reply