Judge orders boy, seven, to live with father after his mother raised him as her daughter and even registered him with his GP as a girl

Our thanks to M for this. The start of the piece:

Social workers let a mother raise her young son as a girl because they were in thrall to ‘transgender equality’.

The boy, who was made to wear a pink hairband, dresses and nail varnish, lived ‘entirely as a girl’.

He was registered as a girl with his doctor’s surgery and was referred to as ‘she’ in official documentation from the age of just four.

But despite the alarm being raised by officials and the boy’s father, council staff failed to intervene.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

3 thoughts on “Judge orders boy, seven, to live with father after his mother raised him as her daughter and even registered him with his GP as a girl

  1. “”Officials said the boy ‘looked dirty, had pen marks on his legs and was dressed as a girl’. No further action was taken because there were ‘no safeguarding concerns’. By August the clamour from the boy’s school, the NSPCC, a GP and the housing unit finally forced the council to act.”

    This is what it took to finally get something done.

    During a meeting with her son after care was transferred to to the lad’s fathger this mother asked;

    “Do you want be a girl?’ she insisted. When her son didn’t answer, she said: ‘I know you are a girl and you feel like a girl and want to be a girl. I know you do – grown ups don’t understand – you need to tell them.’ ”

    She was STILL trying to get HIM to lie for HER.
    Now, I don’t know whether she is mad, bad or both.

    But I do know that this would not have happened had the social workers not been (as the judge said) in thrall to “Transgender equality” (what ever that means).

    The other wrong that has not been righted by these proceedings, is that we are not allowed to know WHICH council is responsible for this grievous state of affairs, so they can hide behind anonymity.
    This abscess is really crying out to be cauterised by the disinfecting light of public knowledge, which needs to be a part of the price they pay for having done it.
    Otherwise no examples have been made, no deterrent applied, and no warning to those who have to live under it’s perview has been made.

    Fake ‘EQUALITY’ has to be one of the most pernicious weapons amongst the SJW’s armoury, and needs to be challenged everywhere it’s foul miasma is detected.

    Like

  2. This may not be a popular opinion, but no one should be recognized as transgender medically, until some stage of legal adulthood. There is still a lot we don’t know about hormone therapy during the growing years and no safeguards against a parent “choosing” an identity for their child which may be foreign to the child’s actually psychology or physiology.

    The headlong way we’ve charged off almost suggests it’s not about transsexuality at all. Almost.

    Like

Leave a reply to epistemol Cancel reply