Patrick Benham-Cresswell: A courageous PM would scrap female combat troops

Well argued. There is no rational case to be made for female combat troops. They would be a danger to themselves and to the many men who would prioritise saving female colleagues’ lives over mission success, regardless of the consequences.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • epistemol

    The folly and absurdity of this policy WILL be it’s own undoing.
    The question is how much damage will be done until this madness has passed.

  • Female combat troops… It sounds foolish to the ear immediately. Why have men even consider allowing it ? The only possible explanation is, once again, out of gentlemanly politeness, not to offend the ladies. I’m afraid men MUST stop tolerating women’s foolish demands simply for traditional politeness. It is completely wrong, dangerous and counterproductive. Save the traditions for private life, not professional one.