2 thoughts on “Fire chief wrongly accused of sex attack on a young man freed after three years in jail thanks to loyal wife’s detective work”
So how did this appalling situation come about in the first place?
Quite simply because the police did not properly investigate the FACTS, as we all thought they were bound to.
(This part of their duty was ‘subcontracted’ to the brave and determined wife of the wrongly accused – if you please.)
And why was this?
Because the police have been told “to believe victims”.
In too many cases, including this one, the accused IS the victim.
This has come about by political corruption at the top – in this case by the rad-fem harridan one Alison Saunders, whose job should be to decide on the merits of the case who to prosecute and who to not.
Instead, she decides on political dogma.
Should anyone require further evidence of this, I refer them to “Waterloogate” the Mark Pearson story, so bizarre and surreal it could scarcely be made up by the late lamented ” Two Ronnies”.
Yet it went ahead nonetheless.
I call upon her to resign in shame.
(Incidentally, I am seriously
tempted to invite anyone with time on their hands to try writing just such a sketch – the result could be most revealing).
I note also that the post of DPP is handed round cultural Marxists like a game of pass the parcel. The previous holder being “Sir” Keir Starmer, named after, yup you got it, Keir Hardie.
No surprises there.
And in fact ‘Sir Keir’ is investigating ways of FURTHER advantaging the pretend victims, (we learn from his Wikipedia entry) – so he’s not done even yet.
Now all this would this would be quite bad enough on it’s own, but on TOP of all that, we learn that complainants can get £ 50,000 from the ‘Criminal Injuries Compensation Board’ WHAT EVER THE TRIAL OUTCOME.
I can’t think of any circumstance more likely to promote corruption and injustice than this.
Someone tell me I have woken up in some sort of parallel reverse universe.
Justice for Men & Boys 
So how did this appalling situation come about in the first place?
Quite simply because the police did not properly investigate the FACTS, as we all thought they were bound to.
(This part of their duty was ‘subcontracted’ to the brave and determined wife of the wrongly accused – if you please.)
And why was this?
Because the police have been told “to believe victims”.
In too many cases, including this one, the accused IS the victim.
This has come about by political corruption at the top – in this case by the rad-fem harridan one Alison Saunders, whose job should be to decide on the merits of the case who to prosecute and who to not.
Instead, she decides on political dogma.
Should anyone require further evidence of this, I refer them to “Waterloogate” the Mark Pearson story, so bizarre and surreal it could scarcely be made up by the late lamented ” Two Ronnies”.
Yet it went ahead nonetheless.
I call upon her to resign in shame.
(Incidentally, I am seriously
tempted to invite anyone with time on their hands to try writing just such a sketch – the result could be most revealing).
I note also that the post of DPP is handed round cultural Marxists like a game of pass the parcel. The previous holder being “Sir” Keir Starmer, named after, yup you got it, Keir Hardie.
No surprises there.
And in fact ‘Sir Keir’ is investigating ways of FURTHER advantaging the pretend victims, (we learn from his Wikipedia entry) – so he’s not done even yet.
Now all this would this would be quite bad enough on it’s own, but on TOP of all that, we learn that complainants can get £ 50,000 from the ‘Criminal Injuries Compensation Board’ WHAT EVER THE TRIAL OUTCOME.
I can’t think of any circumstance more likely to promote corruption and injustice than this.
Someone tell me I have woken up in some sort of parallel reverse universe.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike