Spineless weasels.

This afternoon, we were part of the largest-ever protest against non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors (male genital mutilation, ‘MGM’) in the UK, outside the leading private male genital mutilation clinic in the UK – Thornhill Clinic, Luton. This photo was taken towards the end of the protest, and a number of protesters had left by this point, but it should give you a sense of the scale of the protest. We put a lot of effort into protesting with placards on the Dunstable Road, at the entrance of Thornhill Street, and we were delighted at the support we received from passing pedestrians and drivers.

We look forward to returning to protest outside the Thornhill Clinic before long, with a key difference. In future, we won’t be informing the clinic in advance about the timing of our protests.

This is hilarious. The geniuses at the Thornhill Clinic have changed the clinic’s opening times, presumably to avoid being open during our protest this afternoon.

Here we go, yet again. The start of the article:

Police in England and Wales need to further encourage sexual abuse victims to come forward, the College of Policing has said.

Chief executive Alex Marshall said claims should be “believed” unless there was evidence to the contrary.

We’re looking forward to this afternoon’s protest outside the Thornhill Clinic in Luton, the largest private male circumcision clinic in the country, details here. The four doctors who work at the clinic are on the ‘Known Genital Mutilators’ directory of A Voice for Men, and a London-based practitioner of the illegal procedures joins them today – Rabbi Daniel Berkowitz.

My thanks to all the people who’ve sent links to the row over statements by Raymond Moore, CEO of the Indian Wells tennis tournament, later taken up by Novak Djokovic and others.

Moore had the temerity to point out the blindingly obvious – that in mixed tennis tournaments, the women’s prize money should be less than the men’s, because revenues from ticket sales, television subscribers etc. are far higher for the men’s game than for the women’s game. And because women play far fewer games – in part because their matches consist of a minimum of two out of three sets, the men’s matches a minimum of three out of five sets, 50% more – in tournaments women find so physically undemanding that top female players can often make additional money from doubles matches during the same tournament.

Ridiculous comments from top female players included some from women’s world number one player, Serena Williams, who said Moore’s comments were, ‘offensive and very, very, very, very, very unintelligent.’

Unintelligent? What sort of a weasel word is that, in the context of women getting the same prize money as men, when their matches attract lower revenues, and require less effort? It’s nothing more than a shaming tactic. ‘Intelligent’ people would evidently demand women have the same prize money as men, because vagina.

The solution seems obvious to me. Let’s end the segregation of sports into men’s and women’s variants – the latter usually being as interesting to watch as the drying of paint – and just have:

Sports.

I awoke to the inevitable news that Raymond Moore had resigned. I think we should leave the final words on the matter – for this year, anyway – to Katie Hopkins.

In our 2015 general election manifesto there was a section on sexual abuse (pp.31-37). It included details of a major (American) study on victims of sexual assault by members of the opposite sex, from which we can draw the conclusion that slightly over a quarter of these victims are men.

The criminal justice system in the UK takes virtually no interest in women sexually abusing men, women, and children. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 was a triumph of feminist manipulation, and introduced the principle that only men could rape. So it is that we come to Daniel Stretton’s petition to HM Government, which we would ask you to sign, as we have. Thank you.

Our thanks to Stuart for some rare good news in the area of prostate cancer treatment.

Karen on fine form (video, 34:18). At the London conference she will be speaking on the subject of ‘Toxic Femininity’. You can book your ticket(s) here.

Another good piece from Laura Perrins. Of course mediocre women haven’t the slightest reservation about advancing in preference to better-qualified men. They are utterly shameless, as are the men and women who facilitate all the damnable social engineering which has had such a ruinous impact on the public sector, and will in time have the same impact on the private sector.

The government is threatening to introduce gender quota legislation in 2020 if FTSE350 companies don’t ‘voluntarily’ achieve 33% female representation on their boards by then. Doubtless they’ll cravenly capitulate in the same way FTSE100 companies did in the wake of the ridiculous Davies Report (2011), which resulted in a doubling of the female representation on their boards in the space of four years to 25% (average across the FTSE100). 96% of the new female directors were appointed as Non-Executive Directors – prestige, no executive responsibility, and good money for little effort. No wonder feminists are so keen on such initiatives.