Our thanks to Keith for this. An extract:
A troubled binge-drinking mum has been banned from all pubs after she attacked two women at Teesside bars. Michelle Mackenzie, 41, could not remember breaking a woman’s jaw with one punch after drinking almost a litre of vodka.
Teesside’s top judge did not jail her yesterday, not wanting to punish her three children for her crimes.
The real culprit behind this story is, predictably, a man. Another extract:
Despite knowing what she was capable of, he (the male judge) said, she did not learn her lesson and did exactly the same thing weeks later.
He added: “I’ve taken into account that I’m told, and accept, that for many years you’ve been the subject of domestic violence.
“That of course explains a lot.
It would be interesting to know if the judge had the slightest evidence to believe what he’d been ‘told’. For all we know from this article, she could have been primarily a perpetrator of domestic violence, who sometimes came off worse in fights with her partner.
If the charged party had been a man, who’d been the victim of domestic violence over many years at the hands of a woman, would a judge have said, ‘That of course explains a lot’, and handed him a suspended sentence? Ha.
In declaring he didn’t want to punish the woman’s children for her crimes, the judge essentially told her what she probably already knew – what all women in the UK must know, by now – that she wouldn’t serve an appropriate punishment for her crimes (in this case, a prison sentence).
Women who can batter other women like that can sure as hell batter men. And children. Not separating her from her kids might actually BE punishment for them.
LikeLike
I can’t think of a single time I’ve ever heard of a man committing a crime like this getting away with it because ‘his children would suffer’ or his wife had been attacking him.
LikeLike