Our thanks to Jeff for this. An extract:

The women shrieked with laughter despite the fact that nothing even remotely amusing was said during the course of the show, gave each other sweets as prizes and all in all made themselves sound about as trivial and shallow as ever a gaggle of women has ever managed. Frankly it beggared belief.

This is just the latest example of the BBC giving far too much airtime to unfunny female ‘comedians’, whether as token women on game show panels, or elsewhere.

Two weeks ago we published a video on our YouTube channel, with the content (17 minutes) from Reggie Yates’s anti-MRA documentary on BBC3 which was worth watching. It included contributions from Milo Yiannopoulos and Josh O’Brien, and footage of some London-based MRAs valiantly speaking at Hyde Park Corner. The video has attracted over 3,000 views and over 100 comments.

A few hours ago ‘Irdial Disks’ posted comments in response to the video, and I’m publishing them here with his permission:

The presumption of this nauseating BBC presenter that 18 is “very young to hold an opinion” is really quite something. Lord Nelson joined the navy aged 12, and served on a ship commanded by a maternal uncle. He became a captain at 20, and saw service in the West Indies, Baltic and Canada. He sailed the world from age 12 and no one thought this was at all odd.

Today, just having an opinion is something BBC types think should be reserved for people over 18. This is part and parcel of the deliberate infantilization of the British Man. Thankfully, the internet is breaking the propaganda power of the BBC. People are learning how to think, how to write, how to publish, and coming to their own conclusions based on their experience and research, and not from the pabulum pumped out by the BBC.

The fact that this man records his work in a bedroom and reaches the entire world is belittled by the presenter, but what it shows is that the BBC is essentially finished as a tool to brainwash people. This is the takeaway from stories like this; there are multiple disparate cultures that are thriving without permission, that cause BBC types to blanch with horror.

You don’t have to agree with Roosh, the Manoshphere, White Genocide or any other group, but what you cannot deny is that it is a very good thing that the stranglehold on British thinking of Socialist state media in the form of the BBC is effectively destroyed.

In this piece, the presenter is plainly in the wrong. His positions against free speech are obviously anti-civilization. This is the tipping point, where the basic values of the west, when put to use, come into conflict with BBC Socialism, and freedom of speech wins, every time because the BBC has no arguments; all they have are naked fallacies and tut tutting.

From time to time I’m contacted by academics and students from Oxford University, deploring the growing influence of vicious Feminazi academics and students there. It’s become very obvious to me why the Oxford Union doesn’t give platforms to anti-feminists these days, although, if memory serves right, Edwina Currie took Laurie Penny down several pegs in a debate there once.

My thanks to Peter, an academic who emailed me this morning, for pointing me to a piece published in the Spectator six months ago – here.

The first column I turn to when my weekly Spectator arrives is that of Rod Liddle. His article in today’s edition is here. Conservatives (both upper and lower case ‘c’) may possibly enjoy the piece more than liberals.

J4MB has members, donors, and supporters as far afield as Australia, and two supporters in Eastern Australia – which is 11 hours ahead of GMT – have emailed us to point out they’ve already celebrated the start of 2016. So it seems fitting that we should now wish all our members, donors, and supporters around the world a Happy New Year, and convey our hope that 2016 will prove a happy and healthy year for them and their loved ones.

2015 has been a remarkable year for people with an interest in the issues facing men and boys (and the women who love them) – not forgetting the girls who (in common with boys) are denied access to their fathers by malicious ex-partners, aided by family courts which don’t hold those women properly accountable for their emotional abuse they sadistically heap on their ex-partners and children.

The rise in men’s consciousness over 2015 that they (along with boys) are members of a class whose human rights can be assaulted by the state with impunity – and therefore are assaulted with impunity – has been something to behold. There can be no doubt that men’s consciousness will accelerate further in 2016. It helps that the mainstream media – with the exception of odious feminist-driven organizations such as the BBC – are starting to hold prominent feminists (Vera Baird QC, Jess Phillips MP…) accountable for their hate-driven actions and rhetoric.

In the coming month we shall be announcing the venue and dates for the second International Conference on Men’s Issues, in London. Current details of speakers, ticket prices etc. are here.

If you want to learn the venue and dates of the conference as soon as other people, you need only enter your email address in the subscription box above the column on the right-hand side of this page. You’ll then get automatic notifications of all new blog pieces.

Onwards and upwards in 2016!!!

Our thanks to Chloe for this.

Our thanks to William for this – a woman gloating in a national newspaper about having carried out paternity fraud. She has no reservations about having had a child without the prospect of that child having a loving and supportive father. Her narcissism shines through the piece. An extract:

But as I see it, the nuclear family is in sharp decline: we have gay couples having babies, transgender parents, ‘blended’ families with biological and stepchildren. The new generation is much more open-minded.

Others might accuse me of tricking Hannah’s dad into fatherhood before he was ready and call me some sort of ‘sperm stealer’, but it wasn’t as premeditated as that. We’d been seeing each other for seven weeks before that reckless night.

I didn’t really plan it – well not methodically, anyway – but I wasn’t about to complain when one thing led to another and we took a risk. In all honesty, I never imagined it would work first time.

I bet I’m not the only woman to have exploited a man’s gung-ho attitude to contraception in the hope of falling pregnant. It’s up to men to be more careful if they’re worried. Well above the age of consent and fully versed in the birds and the bees, they’re hardly helpless victims.

Could it be any clearer? Women shouldn’t be expected to display moral agency. If they deceive men into becoming fathers, it’s the men’s fault for trusting them, and the men must face the consequences.

Paternity fraud is a crime under The Fraud Act 2006, and it’s covered in our 2015 general election manifesto (pp. 52-54).

Every year large numbers of men – after being approached by the CSA for child maintenance – contest women’s claims that they’re the fathers of the children, and demand paternity tests. The CSA admitted in a response to our FOI request that 500+ men a year have been cleared in this way for many years. The Crown has never prosecuted women for the crime, despite the state knowing their names, addresses, and knowing they committed the crimes.

Paternity fraud is a common crime in the UK – as elsewhere – but we don’t know how common. It’s one of the reasons we’re calling for compulsory paternity testing at birth. To oblige a man to support a child he didn’t want to have, or to deceive him into believing a child is his, when (s)he isn’t, are egregious crimes by any standards. How would women react to demands that they support children they didn’t want for 20 years, and who may not even be their own?

As usual, women have rights, men have responsibilities.

There are few feminists who’ve attracted more of our attention than Vera Baird QC, the Police & Crime Commissioner of Northumbria. Almost a year ago (2 January 2015) we sent her an 11-page-long letter, calling for her resignation on five counts. We can now add a sixth count, the recent domestic abuse posters.

We repeat our call for her resignation, and will now send an email marked for her attention to enquiries@northumbria-pcc.gov.uk, with a link to this post.

Our thanks to John for this. Good to see the story making it into the Daily Mail, even if the weasel words of a Northumbria Police spokesman, at the end of the piece, are shameful. I’ve added a few comments, in brackets:

A Northumbria police spokesman said they would consider the feedback they had received from the campaign. (… and then ignore it, as always. What else would we expect with a particularly evil feminist, Vera Baird QC, as your PPC?)

He said: ‘Coercive control is a recently recognised form of domestic abuse and is used by perpetrators to control every part of someone’s life, it can be financial control, constant criticism, isolation from family and friends.

‘The offence isn’t limited to just one gender or sexual orientation, anyone can be a victim of coercive control. (So far so good… this can’t last…)

‘Our initial focus, so far, has mainly (solely) been on women as the victims of this offence (… ‘so far’… so when will the focus go on to male victims, or lesbian victims?) – as in the vast majority of cases where domestic abuse is reported to the police – the victims are women. (The reasons for this are well understood, reports to the police are no reflection of the proportion of victims who are male – generally estimated to be in the region 40% – 60%.)

‘That said, we do acknowledge there are male victims out there (Very good of you! A few across the whole of Northumbria, maybe? No. There are MANY of them. Will your recognition ever translate into support for them?) and would encourage anyone who suffers domestic violence to contact police and seek help and support.’

Our thanks to Martin for this. It brought to mind some of the sketches of the late legendary Irish comedian, Dave Allen.