Our thanks to Tim for this. He writes:
Note that the social worker was only concerned with the mother’s well-being and not the little boy who had just suffered an horrific physical assault, permanently damaging his most intimate body parts. And that the article uses the euphemism ‘circumcision’ to make it sound like a medical procedure rather that the ritual mutilation that it is.
Please publish and note the Facebook page of the medical centre so that people can leave their comments – here.
