One thought on “Mirror: ” ‘Men’s rights’ party leader left fuming after he’s invited to hustings with all-female audience””
I particularly enjoy the article’s assertion that you claimed that “most feminists are ‘hatchet-faced miserable women'”, alongside that thumbnail thumbnail, when their link only shows you saying that, generally, those who complain about objectification are hatchet-faced miserable feminists who dislike when men find attractive women attractive.
I know it’s a little bit pedantic, but I’d also like to point out how they replace feminism with women, as if the words mean the same thing. Then they go on to misrepresent the point, making it seem to those who only skimmed the article that you called most feminists unattractive. I think this article is a step in the right direction, especially in bringing the bias of the BBC to light, but the author still felt the need to misrepresent you. I think that speaks towards the attitude of society towards those who speak against the predetermined feminist narrative.
Justice for Men & Boys 
I particularly enjoy the article’s assertion that you claimed that “most feminists are ‘hatchet-faced miserable women'”, alongside that thumbnail thumbnail, when their link only shows you saying that, generally, those who complain about objectification are hatchet-faced miserable feminists who dislike when men find attractive women attractive.
I know it’s a little bit pedantic, but I’d also like to point out how they replace feminism with women, as if the words mean the same thing. Then they go on to misrepresent the point, making it seem to those who only skimmed the article that you called most feminists unattractive. I think this article is a step in the right direction, especially in bringing the bias of the BBC to light, but the author still felt the need to misrepresent you. I think that speaks towards the attitude of society towards those who speak against the predetermined feminist narrative.
LikeLike