Our thanks to Jeff for pointing us to this. In comparison with Dame Stephanie Shirley, 80, how utterly pathetic feminists such as Laura Bates, Caroline Criado-Perez, Kat Banyard, Laurie Penny, Roz Hardie – and countless others – appear. Collectively these dismal women haven’t achieved 1% of what this Dame Stephanie Shirley has. Like all professional feminists, these women are parasites. In a just world they’d be lucky to find a job stacking shelves at Lidl – an honourable line of work, unlike striving to create discord between men and women, for personal gain.

Whenever you think feminists couldn’t sink any lower in their stinking swamps, they do so. This powerful new piece by Ali Mehraspand for AVfM relates what happened after an Afghan mullah raped a 10-year-old girl. To the understandable fury of the girl’s family, an Afghan feminist organisation – heavily dependent on American government and private donor support – allegedly fabricated the story that the girl’s family planned to perform an ‘honour killing’ on her.

The story was reported in the New York Times and other media outlets. Even major newspapers routinely publish fabricated narratives they’re fed by feminist organisations, without checking their accuracy. How sick it is that a major newspaper could believe an Afghan family would kill their 10-year-old daughter after she’d been raped.

This is the point to which decade after decade of unchallenged feminist narratives have driven the mainstream media. The moral of this story? If you want the truth about gender-related matters, look for it on A Voice for Men, not from the New York Times or other mainstream media outlets.

Herbert Purdy’s blog has quickly become a ‘must read’ blog here at the J4MB HQ, and he’s just published this. When you’re on his site, why not join us in subscribing to it (no charge)? Even his lengthiest pieces are well worth reading. It’s one of only two blogs (the other is that of ‘The Conservative Woman’) to which we’ve added an automatic link in recent months, showing their last 10 blog pieces.

Yesterday I was in the studios of London Live TV, being interviewed along with feminists in response to a pre-recorded piece from Laura Bates, the inaugural member of The Whine Club. There were four recorded discussions in total, we’ll be posting links to the videos shortly.

Not a ‘morning person’ at the best of times, I had to set my alarm clock at 02:30 in order to get to the studios in Kensington before 06:00. The studios are in Northcliffe House, the plush headquarters of the Mail, Independent, and Evening Standard newspapers. All the people I saw working in the building at that time were of the male persuasion. A security guard was ‘manning’ Reception, later in the day the sole preserve of women, needless to say.

I digress. The first three short interviews on the topic of sexism were at around 06:15, 07:15 and 08:15, and Roz Hardie was the feminist with whom I had the unadulterated joy of debating.

Ms Hardie is the Chief Executive Officer of the campaign group OBJECT. The ladies have been wittering away for over 10 years now – surely generating enough hot air to raise a fleet of hot-air balloons – and the following extract from their website should give you a flavour of their ‘thinking’:

OBJECT is a human rights organisation which challenges ‘sex object culture’ – a culture in which women are increasingly objectified as sex objects in our media and everyday lives. It is long established that the overwhelming portrayal of women as sex objects in society plays a role in maintaining inequality between women and men.

The organisation campaigns against lapdancing clubs, prostitution – they want the Nordic model which criminalises men and decriminalises prostitutes – Lads’ Mags, page 3 of the Sun… you get the woeful picture. Now the website doesn’t contain any images of Ms Hardie, so far as we can see, so here’s one I found online – it was taken last month – with Ms Hardie wearing a T-shirt bearing the logo, ‘OBJECT: Women Not Sex Objects’. Hopefully, by showing this image, I’m not sexually objectifying her in any way. I’m fairly confident I’m not.

We had plenty of time between the interviews for informal discussions, and at times they became heated. One example was when I learned from Ms Hardie that she felt the £23,000 sponsorships available only to female engineering MSc students at Brunel University are perfectly reasonable, given that it costs more to educate autistic children, and most autistic children are boys. When I related this to a supporter later in the day, he responded:

Dear God, these blithering idiots have an answer to everything!

A good point, well made, I thought.

On a number of occasions during my discussions with Ms Hardie, I pointed to the fact that decade after decade feminists have lied shamelessly to pursue their agendas, they continue to do so, and the mainstream media never (or virtually never) call them out on those lies. I gave as an example the case of Caroline Criado-Perez, to whom we presented a ‘Lying Feminist of the Month’ award – the story is here. We’ll shortly be presenting her with the same award for a second time. Along with her ‘Whiny Feminist of the Month’ award, I think that makes her our most celebrated feminist. In the case of CC-P, as with others I cited, Ms Hardie had the same pat answer, ‘They’re only lying in your opinion.’

I explained it wasn’t a matter of opinion, in each case the feminists were DEMONSTRABLY lying, and in each case we’d published the proof. All of this made no impact on Ms Hardie, of course – a woman I branded a liar in at least one of our three recorded discussions – so it’s time for another public challenge. I’ll be emailing her a link to this blog piece shortly, and the challenge is this:

Roz, yesterday we discussed the issue of feminists lying to advance their agendas, and I cited some examples of feminists – including Caroline Criado-Perez – to whom we’ve presented ‘Lying Feminist of the Month’ awards. In each case you said the women were only lying ‘in your opinion’. I publicly challenge you to email me explaining why, in YOUR opinion, each of these feminists wasn’t lying. Our list of award-winning lying feminists is here. We look forward to hearing from you in due course. Take your time, no rush. Will 12 months be sufficient?

Our thanks to Ray for this.

Tomorrow I’m going to be interviewed ‘live’ on television on one of my favourite subjects – sexism – so it seems apt that I’m writing a piece about a new blog (less than 24 hours old) concerned with real sexism. It’s a welcome addition to the library of men’s human rights websites, and we wish it well. It takes a different line from our own website on anti-male sexism, The Alternative Sexism Project. The estimable gentleman behind the new website can be contacted at realsexism@gmail.com, and earlier today he emailed me the following, which is reproduced with his kind permission:

The aim of the site is not so much to share stories, but to show just how widespread sexism against men is, and how it is much more serious and under-reported than sexism against women. I have a list of sources for all the stats and I am putting them up on the Facebook group, it will take a while however, as I have pages of data. I am taking individual stories, however, I want to focus on the ‘big picture’ and show how men being forced by the state to pay for the support of children – whilst at the same time the state doesn’t enable these men to have reasonable access to them – is far more serious than some girl having someone say something she might find ‘offensive’.

I travel the world a lot, and I have found in pretty much every western country men are the ones doing all the hard work while women spend men’s money and complain about how hard they have it, even if the guy is working himself to death on a building site to pay for her choices.

It’s time people realised the real victims of sexism are men, but you don’t hear them complaining because they’re the ones out working and being exploited by a society that takes them for granted.

As always with Janet Bloomfield (JudgyBitch) – an excellent piece.

The riots in Ferguson, St Louis, will make more sense if you watch this video of police shooting him dead. We don’t want to make a race issue of this – we’re not qualified to – but it’s legitimate for us to make a gender issue of it:

In the same situation, if Kajieme had been a woman, would the police have acted in this manner?

Surely not. Men’s lives are cheap, whatever their race.

There’s been a strong public outcry in newspaper article comment streams concerning Home Office proposals on domestic ‘abuse’ which any intelligent being knows will be used overwhelmingly against men. Heaven forbid, for example, that any women should ask her partner for money, and he declines to give it to her – regardless of what she might want the money for, or his ability to afford the sum requested – if she doesn’t get what she wants, in full, and immediately, that’s DOMESTIC ABUSE. And the state must intervene to punish him, even incarcerate him for denying Special Snowflake whatever her heart desires.

Back in January I wrote a piece for AVfM on this matter.

Three weeks ago we had a promotional poster put up in Bedford Post Office. The design – which has been widely admired – is here. We booked the space for 12 months, to take us past the May 2015 general election, and were planning a series of poster designs. This morning I happened to visit the Post Office, and noticed the poster had been taken down.

I contacted the agency with which we have our contract. It seems the poster was taken down after a woman complained about it this morning. We’ve emailed Sarah Cox, the Editor of a local paper – Beds. on Sunday – asking her to publish the poster design in her paper, and we’ll invite the woman who complained about the design to explain exactly what her objections are.