A video titled ‘What feminists don’t know’ could, of course, have been hours long. This will take up less than three minutes of your time:
A video titled ‘What feminists don’t know’ could, of course, have been hours long. This will take up less than three minutes of your time:
Two of the people I’m most looking forward to in Detroit are Erin Pizzey and Janet Bloomfield (‘JudgyBitch’), so I was very interested in this just-released (37:00) interview:
http://judgybitch.com/2014/05/08/my-interview-with-erin-pizzey/
A small gem on the blog of the American gentleman who presents ‘Entitlement Princess of the Month’ awards:
http://www.antifeministtech.info/2014/05/arcane-knowledge-is-code-for-your-expertise-oppresses-women
I’ve been heartened to see some perceptive reviews of Laura Bates’s new book – the imaginatively-titled Everyday Sexism – on Amazon. I’m hurt to think only 17 out of 50 people didn’t find my review helpful. Or possibly not. I invite you to submit your own comments, here’s the link:
The reviews, in reverse chronological order:
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
13 of 29 people found the following review helpful
As for the “book”, for me it is biased, one sided, a collection of many anecdotes that would make a child laugh, let alone be defined “sexism”. Just some clever marketing to make some more cash on her part. I am disgusted by this, a scam and a rip off as far as I’m concerned.
I read the book,
regret it massively,
waste of my time,
waste of money,
what a shame such a good cause is trivialised and offended by the paucity of this lady’s widely insufficient brains. I am hugely disappointed, as a human being and even more as a woman.
it’s a BIG FAIL for me.
14 of 36 people found the following review helpful
17 of 44 people found the following review helpful
Time for you and the other infantilised whiners to grow up!
17 of 50 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A whine collection from the world’s most prominent whine merchant, 28 April 2014
By
Mike Buchanan (UK) – See all my reviews
| Top of FormBottom of Form | Top of FormBottom of Form |
This review is from: Everyday Sexism (Paperback)
Just what the world needs, a whine collection from the leader of The Everyday Whining Project, the inaugural winner of the ‘Whiny Woman of the Month’ award presented by our political party. Her award certificate is downloadable from a link on the menu of our website, ‘Laura Bates – The Everyday Whiner’. Bates and other whiny feminists e.g. Caroline Criado-Perez – winner of both our ‘Lying Woman of the Month’ and ‘Whiny Woman of the Month’ awards – attract a RIDICULOUS amount of mainstream media attention. They get more attention than all the world’s men’s human rights advocates collectively over the past 30+ years. All I hear when LB or CC-P on TV or radio is, ‘Wah! Wah! Wah!’ like you’d expect from obnoxious toddlers. Of course there are a few sexist men around, but thinking this book will do anything to stop them is absurd. Women are demanding men treat them ever more as Entitlement Princesses, whose feelings are never to be hurt, rather than acting as strong mature adults. Women are infantilising THEMSELVES. It’s truly pathetic. Welcome to the fourth wave of feminism – the whiny wave. With this book out and presumably selling well to whiny women – of whom the world has no shortage, heaven knows – Bates has officially become a professional whine merchant. Making money out of persuading women to buy her books, thereby making them more dysfunctional, miserable, and whiny. She must be SO proud of her ‘achievement’. I see men get a mention in chapter 10. The difference between the sexism faced by women and that faced by men is that men don’t whine about it. If you want to get any sense of the sexism faced by men – which has FAR more serious consequences than the sexism faced by women – visit the website of The Alternative Sexism Project. Mike Buchanan Justice for men & boys (and the women who love them)
Why no voting buttons? We don’t let customers vote on their own reviews, so the voting buttons appear only when you look at reviews submitted by others.
We’re on the final day of the world’s premier snooker tournament, and it’s looking like the result may be close. A legend of the game, Steve ‘Interesting’ Davies, has become the focus of whine merchants, as the Guardian reports:
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/may/04/steve-davis-comments-women-snooker-condemnation
Do whiners never take a day off? So what are they objecting to now? Davis said the following to the BBC World Service’s Sports Hour:
“The male of the species has got a single-minded, obsessional type of brain that I don’t think so many females have.”
He added that women lacked “that single-minded determination in something that must be said is a complete waste of time – trying to put snooker balls into pockets with a pointed stick”.
Anyone with an IQ above that of a fruit fly will recognise that Davis is being self-deprecating and inferring an obvious point with some humour – women aren’t prepared to put in the punishing hours necessary to be successful in professional snooker, even when the potential rewards are so high. It’s reminiscent of Dr Catherine Hakim’s Preference Theory (2000) in which she showed that while four in seven British men are ‘work-centred’, just one in seven British women is. Of course women make a virtue of a lack of work ethic, saying they’re looking for an ‘improved’ work/life balance, and that men who work hard at their careers – and overtake women along the way – are guilty of ‘presenteeism’.
The Guardian article reports:
Lady Grey-Thompson said Steve Davis’s comments were a shame and that a lack of opportunity and encouragement were to blame for the absence of women in snooker.
A lack of opportunity? Why, damn those patriarchs who won’t allow women to play snooker. A lack of encouragement? Give me strength. Why do women always have to be encouraged into male-typical sports and jobs? Taxpayers are funding an army of otherwise unemployable women to do the ‘encouraging’. Maybe… here’s a crazy thought… far fewer women than men want to play snooker, become engineers… in short…
THERE IS NO PROBLEM!!!
This video (31:22) was published yesterday, and is well worth watching from beginning to end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVE6FSzUHr4
The interviewer is Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio http://freedomainradio.com.
Definitely one for the overflowing ‘You couldn’t make this s*** up!’ file:
You have to ask, how exactly might you FORCE someone to work whilst unpaid? Could these women not have… oh, I don’t know, let me put something crazy out there… stopped doing this ‘work’? Maybe they could then have trained to become female engineers / physicists / mathematicians, of whom there’s a pressing shortage, we understand.