[Note added 13.7.14: This piece has just been published by A Voice for Men, here.]
I was interviewed at some length (16 minutes) by Jeni Barnett (standing in for Vanessa Feltz) on BBC Radio London 94.9 this morning, on the topic of positive discrimination. The piece has just been loaded onto our YT channel, here.
I would ask you to read the commentary beneath the audio file before listening to it. The question I was asked at 22:15 was, in my view, outrageous:
Do you like women, Mike?
In most of my BBC radio interviews the presenters (both male and female) have alleged or implied I’m a misogynist. People who know me well know that nothing could be further from the truth.
Please submit any comments you may have on the YouTube piece, rather than here. Thank you.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Wow, Mike, you’re on fire lately. Great job! Jeni came across as a bit of a numpty if I’m honest but that’s most likely because you hit her with so many indisputable facts from every angle that she probably couldn’t think quick enough, hence the ridiculous shaming tactics approach. Apparently, according to her, women give birth and men take life away!!! WTF!
When’s the next interview Mike….can’t wait!
LikeLike
What I learned from Vanessa: Money is simply not important but women are–whatever they want or even if they’re frankly ambivalent–we need to give them money and preferential treatment so that more of them are working doing things for which they are not qualified or which they don’t find particularly satisfying. Anyone who disagrees with this must not like women or is otherwise bad. Do I have that right? If so, I deserve a financial reward for my brilliance I mean femaleness. Please mail your check to…;)
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Once again, another woman, Jeni Barnett, full of the same old, same old, same old, s*it, the pre-programmed arguments of feminism (I honestly thought the women work as housewives argument had long since died the natural death it deserves – bet hey here it is again, alive and well in Jeni Barnett).
The truth is, these bigoted, frankly rather vacuous and stupid women, steeped in nothing but the rhetoric of feminism (and, incidentally, the women’s work in the household is pure Engels, which shows the communist, family destroying nature of feminism in its true colours) and with no intelligence to address the indisputable facts.
As Mike Buchanan says, there is no problem to solve. The only reason we have a problem is because feminists have declared it a problem because they are stamping their feet, demanding special treatment. They want to be equal, but they don’t really want to be equal if equality means they don’t get their unreasonable, ill thought-through and, frankly rather stupid demands met.
They just cannot accept that the normal outcomes of a diverse and evolving society means less women in Parliament and on corporate boards, as well as in careers which demand full time commitment if those women are to be able to progress to the top.
Where the rather intellectually challenged Jeni Barnett and her like fail lies purely in their indoctrination by feminism, which they simply cannot get past. They don’t use their brains (such as they are in the case of Jeni Barnett) because to do so would make them see the sheer stupidity of their rigid and unbending dogma.
Barnett latches on to the canard about women’s work in the home being work, yet Mike was talking, rightly, about the work of women as units of economic production. It is in jobs and careers (not ‘work’ per se) that far less women are work centred. And the reason? Because the ‘work’ they choose to do in bearing and bringing up children comes first. They make choices. They have to make choices to fulfil their biological role, and they make value choices as between fulfilment as mothers and fulfilment as careerists.
Women who forego children (or who short-change their children by farming out their upbringing to others so they can pursue their own needs in high powered careers) get on – and they reach the top. They are just as able as men. Nobody’s arguing about that.
I mean what bit of this do these bigoted fools not understand?
LikeLike
nature created both men and women. But feminists seek to abolish womanhood. The replacement they came up with, (present day women) can not be really considered as good as traditional males,nor as good as traditional females. So we ended up with normal,proper men and second rate men,which used to be called proper women before.
LikeLike
Just listened to this. Ditto all the above. I was struck in the earlier bit with”sonny” that the discussion about MPs never once mentioned voters. Clearly the idea that it is the electors that decide on the MP is passé. Which goes to show the low regard the elite actually have for the electorate(aka real people). Of course it also means they miss that being an MP , or any elected member, is not a “job” in the same way as most other paid work. Well done Mike. And I too was spluteringly furious at the men are killers misandry. Has Jeni never been ill? And had to depend on the wonders of medical science and skills of any male Doc.? Casual misandry shot through her comments.
LikeLike