Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions, and the show trials of prominent men

Note added 4.3.14: This piece has just been posted on ‘A Voice for Men’, where we expect it to attract a high number of comments:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/alison-saunders-director-of-public-prosecutions-and-the-show-trials-of-men-in-the-uk/ ]

Last night Laura Kuenssberg interviewed Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, on Newsnight. An edited piece has just been published on our YouTube channel, thanks to the good man behind the ManWomanMyth and ‘Humanity Bites’ YouTube channels. We invite you to read our associated notes first, watch the video, then post a comment (there rather than on this blog post). Thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ci5rF_l1I&feature=c4-overview&list=UUKhX1c3ow6BrzdzP3ydpeZQ

Stop divorce payouts after ten years, say law experts: Review calls for reforms to make sure husband and wife are financially independent

An interesting new piece in the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568867/Stop-divorce-payouts-ten-years-say-law-experts-Review-calls-reforms-make-sure-husband-wife-financially-independent.html

It’s a start, but you can be very sure feminists politicians (and their male collaborators) will corrupt the legislative process to favour women over men, and divorce courts will continue to exert a strong anti-male bias at every opportunity. Apart from which, women will inevitably continue to marry men with more financial assets than they have, so little money will flow from women to men in practise. Some things in life never change.

The ‘Guardian’ ignores male victims of severe domestic violence

During 2011/12, 1.3% of men and 1.3% of women were victims of severe force at the hands of their partners (Source: Office for National Statistics, Crime Survey – Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences, 2011/12, Table 4.01).

From yesterday’s Guardian, a piece by a female journalist (as usual):

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/26/domestic-violence-risk-death-injury-police

The article starts:

More than 10,000 women and children are at high risk of being murdered or seriously injured by current or former partners, according to police assessments obtained by the Guardian.

In a stark illustration of the levels of domestic violence across the country, data from 34 out of the 44 police forces in England, Wales and Scotland reveals  that at least 10,952 individuals, most of whom are women, were deemed to be at high risk of violent death in the home, or of suffering serious violence, in the year to November.

But the figures obtained are likely to be an underestimate as domestic violence is heavily under-reported and police forces appear to gather and collate the information in several different ways, despite demands for a national protocol on assessing the risk to victims. The snapshot obtained by the Guardian reveals the acute nature of the threat of domestic violence for thousands of women and children.

The phrase ‘most of whom are women’ is the only indication in this article that male victims of severe domestic violence even exist. The average reader might reasonably have assumed that the overwhelming majority of victims are women. In  the article every example of victims relate to women, every example of perpetrators (including murderers) relate to men. There isn’t even one instance of concern shown for men who are victims of severe force at the hands of their partners. Later in the article:

Sandra Horley, chief executive of Refuge, said domestic violence was a problem of systemic proportions. She said women and children deemed to be at the highest risk must be given proper protection and the police must not use risk assessment as a “tick box” exercise.

“There is no point in doing a risk assessment if the knowledge gained does not lead to proactive safety planning measures that keep women and children safe from violent men.

“I am deeply concerned that in too many cases this does not happen,” she said.

It’s little wonder the general public is so ill-informed about domestic violence. If Mark Brooks of Mankind Initiative had been approached for a comment, he might reasonably have replaced the word ‘women’ with ‘men’, and the word ‘men’ with ‘women’, and the section would still have made perfect sense.

BBC Radio Tees interview – ‘women’s sports on TV’

[Note added 6.3.14: ‘A Voice for Men’ have just published this piece, where we hope it will attract plenty more comments:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/gynocentrism/should-there-be-more-coverage-of-womens-sports-on-television/ ]

[Note added 28.2.14: edited piece now posted on our YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMvPbalEM3o&list=UUKhX1c3ow6BrzdzP3ydpeZQ&feature=c4-overview ]

I much enjoyed an interview this morning:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01rrcrv

We’ll get an edited piece on our YouTube channel as soon as we can, but the key content is the following. There may be more related content after 1:14:15 as the interviewer was inviting people to call in. The programme will be available online for a week.

49:05 – 58:10 Mike Parr interviews Shona Malcolm (head of The Ladies’ Golf Union) and myself.

1:07:25 – 1:10:20 Pre-recorded interview between Mike Parr and Steve Hewlett, a broadcaster and media commentator.

1:10:21 – 1:14:15 Mike Parr interviews Eleanor Pinder, who works on a number of projects with Middlesborough football Club, and is a netball player.

At 1:12:24 Mike Parr asks Eleanor Pinder, ‘Is the quality of women’s football as good (as men’s football)?’ Her response:

‘Erm… it’s a different level, I suppose, not so fast potentially, but that doesn’t mean it’s not watchable.’

‘… that doesn’t mean it’s not watchable’. Priceless. Just after the end of her interview there’s a very brief exchange between Mike Parr and ‘Nick’, the man who reports on the traffic. It’s the last thing in the section ending at 1:14:15. Don’t miss it.

Tickets for the first international conference on men’s issues have just gone on sale.

I’m really looking forward to making a presentation – ‘Men’s rights – let’s get political’ – at the first international conference on men’s issues. It’s going to be hosted by AVfM, and held in Detroit 27/28 June. Tickets have just gone on sale:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/tickets-for-international-conference-on-mens-issues-now-on-sale/

There are only 300 tickets available, and a number of J4MB supporters have signalled their intention to join me at the event. If you want to attend this important conference, take my advice. Book soon. Tickets won’t be available for long, at least not at the current price. A black market for tickets at inflated prices will probably emerge within days.

Harriet Harman is grilled by Laura Kuenssberg… to a crisp.

Laura Kuenssberg is rapidly becoming our favourite interviewer. Hot on the heels of her recent outstanding piece on Newsnight about the forthcoming potential criminalisation of prostitution in England and Wales, last night she interviewed Harriet Harman at length about the issue of the Paedophile Information Exchange’s affiliation with the National Council of Civil Liberties (of which Harriet Harman was the legal officer for some years)over 30 years ago:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03wsyqm/Newsnight_24_02_2014/

We’ll be posting the piece on our YouTube channel in the next day or two, but if you want to watch this now, these are the relevant sections:

00:00 – 0:30 Introduction by Jeremy Paxman

1:02 – 3:16 Background to the story

3:17 – 10:57 Harriet Harman interviewed by Laura Kuenssberg

10:58 – 12:33 Discussion between Jeremy Paxman and Laura Kuenssberg

We can’t recall an interview in which Harman – a vile radical feminist of the worst sort – has ever been challenged so professionally and unflinchingly. We comment Laura Kuenssberg on a job well done. We’d pay good money to see her interview the damnable woman at greater length about the damage she’s wrought on British society over more than 30 years.