Our thanks to Graham for this.

He writes “Banker Damilare Ajao was jailed for 20 months and ordered to pay £150,000 after his sexual harassment claim against a female boss was found to be false, described by the judge as “wicked lies.” 

By contrast, women’s claims are usually presumed true, with the law and workplace policies focusing on the victim’s perception. Even when later proven false, such claims rarely result in punishment. The case highlights a system that protects victims in a way that seemingly only works one way.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Our thanks to Douglas for this.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Our thanks to Paolo for this. The phrase “Go woke, go broke” springs to mind.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Our thanks to Tom for this (video, 1:05).

Does anyone really understand quantum mechanics? It’s doubtful, given that even Richard Feynman, the great American theoretical physicist, said he didn’t. I recall studying the subject during the first year of my chemistry degree in 1979/80, and being highly relieved to learn I didn’t have to study it thereafter. All the students who did go on to study it further were men with unusually large shiny pointy heads, I recall.

Does anyone in the manosphere understand quantum mechanics? I turned to William Collins (Rick Bradford) of The Illiustrated Empathy Gap who I happen to know secured a degree in physics at the University of Cambridge in… well, let’s be honest, not recently. He directed me to two of his international bestsellers which really should be in every MRA’s library – The Unweirding: not just another quantum mechanics text (2020) and Five Square Roots: the remarkable fecundity of impossible square roots (2023). You now have no reason to say you’re struggling to find the perfect Xmas presents for anyone…

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Excellent video (13:28) from the YouTuber Baggage Claim. Denouncing feminism always sounds so much better coming from a woman. And there’s more and more of them!

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel. Our YouTube channel is here

Today’s video is here (21:40).

Over a period of more than two years we’re posting links to one video daily from the J4MB YouTube channel. The channel includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ) and other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).

Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The related comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty. 

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

A brilliant piece from Sargon. What I and many have been thinking for a long time. Video (12:17).

Thanks to Eli for this comment “I’m wondering how much it costs to train all these sexy prison guardesses… Only to end up firing them (at best), or bringing them into the system as an inmate instead – only so we can pretend that we don’t know why we would need to sex segregate these workplaces.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Matt Goodwin’s latest newsletter from his Substack.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

A round-up of the free speech news of the week.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here

Our thanks to Mike Buchanan for this on Times Radio a weeks ago, Peter Hitchens on Prince Andrew: The King has failed to observe the presumption of innocence, (video,15:45). He writes:

“The treatment of Prince Andrew by King Charles III and the mainstream media has been utterly scandalous.

There is no evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Prince Andrew – third in line to the throne in 2001, after Prince Charles and Prince William – ever met Virginia Giuffre. Even if what she later claimed was true – that they had sex in London when she was 17 – he would have committed no crime under UK law, and even if he recalled the matter, his denial would have been perfectly understandable. One of the reasons men pay highly for sex with prostitutes is that they go away afterwards.

It is claimed that the infamous photograph was taken on a disposable camera and had an imprint from the photo processing lab that read: “000 #15 13Mar01 Walgreens One Hour Photo”. This allegedly indicated the photo was developed on March 13, 2001, near Virginia Giuffre’s Florida home after she returned from London.

A number of possible explanations occur to me. One is that the photograph is genuine, and that Prince Andrew naively agreed to pose with the 17-year-old prostitute, presumably accepting her assurance that she wouldn’t share it with anyone. But even if that was what happened, and they had sex, he would have committed no crime under UK law.

The other possibility is that the Walgreens imprint was faked in order to back up Giuffre’s story of having met the Prince. Given the potential value of the image – Prince Andrews’s eventual payout to Giuffre was in the order of millions of pounds – the cost of faking the imprint would surely have been utterly trivial by comparison.

Prince Andrew should have been presumed innocent from the outset. If the poor man takes his own life, his blood will be on King Charles’s hands.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel. Our YouTube channel is here.