If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Met officer Jennifer Stowers, 37, sacked for taking the piss – running a tanning salon for two years while ‘unable to report for duty due to mental health’.
George Abaraonye loses Oxford Union confidence vote in landslide after Charlie Kirk controversy
Prison officer Alicia Novas, 19, and inmate in court over relationship
Our thanks to Jeff for this. Extracts take up the remainder of this blog piece:
“Alicia Novas, 19, [J4MB emphasis. Need I point out the insanity of recruiting a teenage girl as a prison officer?!!!] and Declan Winkless, 30, appeared separately at Northampton Magistrates’ Court on Monday charged with committing misconduct in public office at HMP Five Wells between August and December last year… [BBC: Sloppy journalism. The inmate wouldn’t have been charged with that offence.]
Ms Novas, acting as a prison custody officer, is accused of “wilfully” misconducting “herself in a way which amounted to an abuse of the public’s trust”.
The charges, detailed in court documents, state that Mr Winkless is alleged to have encouraged and assisted both offences. [J4MB emphasis. I am reminded of the episode of Porridge in which inmate Lennie Godber complains to a warden, Mr Mackay, that someone has stole something from his cell. Mr Mackay replies with some relish something along the lines of, “You need to be more careful, Mr Godber. There are some dishonest types around here!”]
The court heard that Ms Novas provided her telephone number to Mr Winkless, failed to report his possession of a telephone and cannabis, and entered “into a sexual relationship” with him.
A second joint charge of misconduct is said to have been committed by the pair on 23 November, when Ms Novas provided information about whether Mr Winkless was suspected of wrongdoing by prison authorities.
Both defendants face further charges of making an illegal electronic transmission from a prison, one of bringing, throwing or conveying cannabis into a prison [J4MB emphasis. Hmm, I wonder where she hid it on her person?] and one of conveying two mobile phones into a jail, [J4MB emphasis. The same question occurs to me.] all relating to HMP Five Wells, near Wellingborough…
Ms Novas, wearing a white top and black trousers, appeared in court in person while Mr Winkless appeared before magistrates via a prison video-link. [J4MB emphasis. The female BBC ‘journalist’ fails to tell us what the inmate was wearing. Presumably the regulation black trousers and a shirt with arrows pointing upwards.]
The female defendant, of Raunds, Northamptonshire, was granted bail with conditions not to contact Mr Winkless, not to contact any serving HMP prisoner by any means and not to attend any prison except by prior arrangement.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
cp comments on William Collins’s latest blog piece, “Unwin, Glubb, Sulikowski and the Decline of the West”.
Yesterday we posted an outstanding piece by William Collins, Unwin, Glubb, Sulikowski and the Decline of the West. For a time we’ll make it the blog piece at the top on this website. Our thanks to cp for his excellent response, which takes up the remainder of this blog piece:
“Getting our genes into the next generation is life’s biggest battle. Everything else is subsidiary, and merely chess pieces we play with a specific endgame in subconscious mind. Back in the (relatively recent) past of the 1970s, it remained very much up to men to compete and gain the attention of women, who’d (mainly) still wait by the finishing line for the winners. All of us young guys knew, subliminally, the rules of Roy F Baumeister’s Sexual Economics – that having a good job was the main male trading card in the sexual marketplace (even though these rules wouldn’t be published until 2004).
As a result, Reproductive Suppression of one’s peers remained very much a male domain, and was associated with competition rather than manipulation. As a scrawny, working class kid with a (badly) broken nose, I knew that I needed to purchase a Bullworker and play to my strengths. After two degrees and a good job, suddenly developed a gravitational field for women, and the future became bright and beautiful.
But the world was changing fast, and women were on the ascendancy in the workplace (including politics and jurisprudence), giving them direct access to influencing law in a way which would suit female preference for rotating, temporary monogamy, always aiming upwards. Females gain reproductive advantage in their offspring through polyandry, minimising the chances that all of their offspring will carry genetic defects from a single sexual partner.
As a result, we have ‘no fault’ divorce, a form of male asset stripping after providing a woman with a child. We have AA, EEO, ESG and DEI in the workplace, making it more difficult for males to succeed, and where all males beneath a woman’s pay-grade are invisible, and ‘sexual harassment’ legislation keep them invisible. By law. Women with political power act like the Handicapper General, Diana Moon-Glampers (in Kurt Vonnegut’s 1961 novel ‘Harrison Bergeron’). In that way, they can be sure that only the brightest and best males will succeed, and will flock to them. Women appear to have few problems with polygyny, as long as there’s enough money to go around.
Having crocked men in plain sight, the successful women in the know are now attempting to disadvantage their own sex in the reproductive stakes through the spurious ‘equality’ and virtue-signalling dogmas which have served them so well. The sixteen bullet points on page 14 of William Collins’ 17-page tour de force shows the game plan. And the likelihood that it will succeed, through female skill in manipulation, and her deep-seated need for social approval.
I’m not convinced that men will see through the manipulation. It’s not a tactic which we tend to use. Whereas, we have been manipulated by women, biochemically, forever. This article provides some lines which can be read between.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686380/ That ‘selfish entity’ now has control of politics, jurisprudence & media.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Some extraordinary women support J4MB. Here are two of them (2015). Video #89 of 800+ videos on the J4MB YouTube channel.
Sadly, Anne O’Regan died not long ago. A remarkable woman.
Today’s video is here (18:17).
Over a period of more than two years we’re posting links to one video daily from the J4MB YouTube channel. The channel includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ) and other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.
Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).
Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The related comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
The Nuzzo Letter: “American Time Use Survey, 2003-2024.”
Interesting. I’ve just posted this:
“Thanks James, fascinating. I can’t see any data for commuting to and from work. It’s always been my understanding that on average men spend more time commuting than women, one reason being their workplaces are more likely to be further away. Can you shed any light on this? Thanks.”
Update. James’s response:
“Good question, Mike. Commuting time for work is a subcategory within the broader category of “working and work-related activities.” I didn’t graph that subcategory, but the data tables show that males spend more time than females in travel related to work.”
I asked James to provide a link to the data tables, he replied with the following:
“The pdf at the below link is the table that contains the results from 2024. Toward the top of the third page (second row in the table), you will see “Travel related to work” listed under the “Activity” column. That’s the relevant data for 2024. https://www.bls.gov/tus/tables/a1-2024.pdf“
The data shows men commute 0.3 hours per day on average, women 0.19 hours.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Father Ted creator Graham Linehan to face ‘no further action’ as Met drops probe into alleged anti-trans tweets
Wonderful news. We look forward to following his case for wrongful arrest.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Nigel Farage issued knife-edge warning by Dominic Cummings that could ‘implode’ Reform or hand him keys to No10
William Collins: “Unwin, Glubb, Sulikowski and the Decline of the West.”
Outstanding. Lengthy (8,860 words) but worth reading in full, possibly several times.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 