Baroness D’Souza accepted that her letter [J4MB: on House of Lords letterhead] to the Met Police chief was “inappropriate” and said she “deeply regretted” the decision to send it, after she’d been rumbled. [J4MB: We may have added a few words at the end, but we think they’re implied.]
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
At a Muslim charity fun run, held in the heart of London, last weekend, women and girls over the age of 12 years old were excluded from participating.”
I’ve just posted these comments:
“Thanks Matt. You write:
“… we live in a country that believes in the rights of women.”
Sadly, we do NOT live in a country that believes in the rights of men and boys. Anyone who doubts this statement is invited to check out our last manifesto as a political party, two years ago:
Onto the matter you write about today. There are plenty of women-only and girls-only runs and nobody bats an eyelid.
As an example of male rights being assaulted by the actions and/or inactions of the state, let’s consider circumcision / Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) carried out as early as eight days of age by the Jewish community and later (but always pre-pubescence, for obvious reasons) by the Muslim community. What an egregious assault on the human rights of children.
Carrying out MGM is an implicit criminal offence in the UK, being at least ABH and almost certainly GBH under the terms of the Offences of the Persons Act 1861. I sought to bring a prosecution against a (Sikh) doctor and a judge blocked me from doing so.
Matt, I believe Reform UK could land millions more votes by including in its next manifesto men’s and boys’ issues including the family courts which in their custody decisions are so cruel to children, fathers, grandparents, uncles and aunts… so many voters that all the other parties ignore. Isn’t it time you wrote an article about the matter? I’d be happy to supply any input I can. Thanks.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).
Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our thanks to Jeff for this good news, Mr Jackson claims Danielle Meagher has still not apologised for the false allegations. The start of the piece:
“The father of Paddy Jackson is to be awarded £100,000 in libel damages for false claims he tried to pay off the complainant at the rugby star’s rape trial, a judge ruled today.
Peter Jackson secured the payout against reality TV personality Danielle Meagher over the lies she posted on social media.
Delivering judgment at the High Court in Belfast, Master Mark Harvey insisted there must be consequences for her “vile” allegations.
“There seems to be a sense in some quarters that there is an online cloak of invisibility leading people to type things on a keyboard they may never utter in person,” he said.
“Such cowardly online bile causes real-life hurt and upset to other people and damages their reputation.
“The message needs to be out there that when someone posts baseless and libelous accusations online, the repercussions can be very serious.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Interesting, although the article employs the feminist term (and myth) “gender-based violence”.
The false rape allegation was made by the man’s ex-wife. It’s an opportune time to point again to Janet Bloomfield’s 2014 piece for A Voice for Men, 13 reasons women lie about being raped. It’s not a full list of the reasons.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
An interesting piece in yesterday’s Telegraph (£). The paper is campaigning for ‘targeted screening’, more below. An extract:
“The report – to be released in the Commons on Tuesday – shows that screening all men aged 50 to 69 would be significantly cheaper than the current breast screening programme.
The research shows that first targeting checks at the groups most at risk – those who are black, have a family history of the disease or genes linked to it, and are aged between 45 and 69 – would cost 0.01 per cent of the NHS budget.” [J4MB: Note that women are eligible for breast cancer screening between the agres of 50 and 71. Other than age, there is no ‘targeting’ for breast cancer testing on the grounds of race.]
In addition to those with a history of prostate cancer or genes linked to prostate cancer, all black men will be tested, and no white men. Those black men’s lives will be deemed by the state to be worth £18, the white men’s lives will be deemed to be worth nothing. There are 20x more white men than black men in the UK.
The findings suggest around £20,000 would be spent for every year of life saved – well within the thresholds typically considered cost-effective for the NHS.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Justice for Men & Boys 