If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
2 thoughts on ““We interviewed Australian women who sexually abused children. This is what we learnt.””
The gyno-centricity of how women are always victims, even when theyre the convicted sexual perpetrators is staggering.
If only women had xyz, then they woukdnt have offended. The use of the word “barrier” portraying women as being blocked and prevented from help; that society is to blame, that women are the victims of an incomplete support network, that wwomen are always the victims of toxic relationships…yet are strong and independent, earn more than men, have more education than men but still no accountability for their actions…”if only I had counselling I wouldn’t have sexually assaulted children” is classic victimhood.
Whether you get access to counselling, financial support or whatever, its not rocket science to know sexual assault against a child is wrong.
The issue is that women dont take accountability and here we have a clearly female team making excuses in feminist language for female monsters.
Exactly. In this country (UK) it is Government policy to close all women’s Prisons. The explanation for this is, as in this article, that offending women are in fact vulnerable and “victims” and need help and support not incarceration. At the same time it is policy to increase the number of male Prisons. As noted in this piece it is the case that the number offenders has been increasing, male and female. But it is a matter of public policy that men and women are treated by all aspects of the policing and criminal justice institutions completely differently. For clarity I should add this applies to all forms of crime.
Being a bit of a “liberal” sort (in its older meaning) I’d be happy if at least some boys and men to find that Gov. set itself ” The challenge that remains is ensuring services are not only available but visible, accessible, nonjudgmental and clearly inclusive” As in my experience many young men in Prison have a parade of problems (addictions, “broken homes”, institutional care and illiteracy being common) I’d be open to at least some I’d be open to some at least getting some real help. But of course visible, accessible and nonjudgemental support is nowhere on the agenda for males.
The gyno-centricity of how women are always victims, even when theyre the convicted sexual perpetrators is staggering.
If only women had xyz, then they woukdnt have offended. The use of the word “barrier” portraying women as being blocked and prevented from help; that society is to blame, that women are the victims of an incomplete support network, that wwomen are always the victims of toxic relationships…yet are strong and independent, earn more than men, have more education than men but still no accountability for their actions…”if only I had counselling I wouldn’t have sexually assaulted children” is classic victimhood.
Whether you get access to counselling, financial support or whatever, its not rocket science to know sexual assault against a child is wrong.
The issue is that women dont take accountability and here we have a clearly female team making excuses in feminist language for female monsters.
Keep up the good work!
Rad
LikeLiked by 3 people
Exactly. In this country (UK) it is Government policy to close all women’s Prisons. The explanation for this is, as in this article, that offending women are in fact vulnerable and “victims” and need help and support not incarceration. At the same time it is policy to increase the number of male Prisons. As noted in this piece it is the case that the number offenders has been increasing, male and female. But it is a matter of public policy that men and women are treated by all aspects of the policing and criminal justice institutions completely differently. For clarity I should add this applies to all forms of crime.
Being a bit of a “liberal” sort (in its older meaning) I’d be happy if at least some boys and men to find that Gov. set itself ” The challenge that remains is ensuring services are not only available but visible, accessible, nonjudgmental and clearly inclusive” As in my experience many young men in Prison have a parade of problems (addictions, “broken homes”, institutional care and illiteracy being common) I’d be open to at least some I’d be open to some at least getting some real help. But of course visible, accessible and nonjudgemental support is nowhere on the agenda for males.
Perhaps Australia is different?
LikeLiked by 2 people