Today’s video is here (5:29).
Over a period of almost six months we’re posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.
You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Not as laughable or untrue as one might wish.
An AI engine query revealed this:
Dr. Bernard Nathanson—a co-founder of NARAL and a former abortion provider—publicly confessed that he and his colleagues deliberately coined and popularised the term “pro‑choice” in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Their aim was to frame abortion as a matter of freedom and personal autonomy rather than as a medical or moral dilemma.
📌 How it happened
A 1972 memo from Jimmye Kimmey (Association for the Study of Abortion) confirms this strategic branding: the phrase “right to choose” was chosen deliberately over alternatives like “freedom of conscience”
Nathanson recounts that he, along with bioethicist colleague Christopher Tietze and activist Lawrence Lader, crafted terms like “freedom of choice”, “a woman’s right to control her own body”, and “right to choose”, knowing they would resonate emotionally and politically .
He admitted the slogans were “sexy, catchy” and consciously designed to outmaneuver opponents. Nathanson even confessed they “laughed” at how cynical they were.
🎯 Nathanson’s later reflection
In his 1979 memoir Aborting America, and in interviews later in life, Nathanson admitted the term was manufactured for political effect, saying he coined them “cynically, knowing they were not really substantial, medically and morally”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Douglas.
LikeLike