Utter bilge in The Spectator (£). I’ve left some comments but would like to share comments from others:
Is this The Guardian?
What a load of utter tripe. Last straw time I think.
This woman should stick to writing about things which don’t require any understanding of economics, politics or law or, actually, anything grown up.
Why do we now have this far left grifter writing twaddle?
“Now, Mr Editor, what have you done that’s really, really naughty? Commissioned a nasty article unworthy of the Spectator? I think you should be punished, don’t you?”
What is this gobbledegook?
Nurse! Nurse! Laurie Penny is awake!
This is unreadable. It is incoherent. It is a jumbled mess of deconstructing metaphors and personal anecdotes. Lastly, it is dull. And boring. Why am I paying a subscription for this? How did this get past the editor’s desk? Or maybe it was even worse and this is infinitely better after countless re-writes. Dreadful.
If I may summarise: if your politics are to the right of Laurie’s you are a pervert. Laurie is understanding of this but all they ask is you keep your fetishes private (which seems reasonable).
Rambling, interminable dross.
“I’ve always considered sadism the distinguishing factor: if you’re actually enjoying hurting another person, your motives are suspect and you should probably stop.” And yet you ploughed on for another nine torturous paragraphs.
Who is this child and why is he/she writing in the Spectator?
I waded as far as: ‘I don’t want to yuck anyone’s yum’. What utter bilge. And the writer of this execrable twaddle is proof alone that woke is far from over.
Why would the editor of the Spectator sanction this waste of space? Is he intent on destroying what’s left of the magazine’s reputation? I could only stomach fragments of her garbage – but she sounds disturbed and using it as clickbait is cheap. The only consolation about woke is that the intensity increases in a desperate attempt to survive as Trump cuts off the funds. This writer should stick to simple facts and maybe try to explain the Chagos deal – £30bn of virtue-signalling is a lot of healthcare. Mr Gove , I am sure you have a sophisticated explanation for this dross but you are badly mistaken.
I didn’t even manage to get halfway through before giving up in disbelief. Supercaloflagelisticexpealedotious.
Is Mr. Gove still reclining on that beach in Aberdeen? I suggest he gets back to Old Queen Street and that he sorts out these juvenile journos. Pronto!
‘ … I don’t want to yuck anyone’s yum …’ . Pass the sick bucket.
I’d expect to read this juvenile dross in a 6th Form magazine. Is that what the Spectator is becoming under your leadership Gover?
What a preposterous article. Enough said.
Well done Laurie, for constructing such an impressive and imposing straw man. When do you plan to burn it?
Well, that’s us told.
Is it competition time in the Spectator today Lord Gove? To see who can come up with the biggest load of bow locks of an article? First up we had Newkey-Burden telling us all about his seagull fetish. Now this drivel.
Summary of article: if you don’t agree with my exact politics, you’re a pervert. How typical of the maturity of thought on the Left.
Drivel
Why, just, why ?
did you seriously pay for this article?
Ms Penny, it’s not the likes of Hannan making a fetish of being led around and spanked, it’s people like you. But then again, the first defining characteristic of the Left is projection, so at least you are on brand 🙂
I’m so terribly sorry for people with a whole collection of mental illnesses, like this pitiful fruitcake.
Her life must be very hard indeed.
What a moronic article.
A promise; one more article by this woman in this magazine and my subscription is cancelled.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 