Our thanks to Warren for an email which takes up the remainder of this blog piece:
“Saw this proposal from Shabana Mahmood in this morning’s papers, and meant to contact you about it then. By this evening, it has its own BBC article. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crmkv3jezzdo
It’s interesting that Ms Mahmood’s words repeat the same old tired phrase of ‘power & control’, taken from the (discredited) Duluth Model.
As we know, much of feminist ‘theory’ like Duluth is actually a projection of how their own minds work. And would be hard pressed to think of a more viable explanation than a desire for ‘power & control’ for the wave of assaults on underage boys by female teachers, this article being the tip of an iceberg. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/women-teachers-who-prey-pupils-29207181
Of course, Ms Mahmood will be doing everything in her power to keep these women out of prison. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
Will she be using chemical means to keep them out of prison, prevent their re-offending, and curb their desire for ‘power & control’? I rather think not.
Has Ms Mahmood no idea that (at least) 15% of the men serving sentences for such crimes shouldn’t be there. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4509177
In fact, has the woman never heard of Andy Malkinson, whose conviction was presumed to be ‘safe’? At least, it was considered as such by the woman who used to run the Criminal Cases Review Board. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yewwrgd5zo
The ladies are running amok.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
If there’s one thing we know about giving feminists a bit of power, it’s that they don’t know where to draw the line, can never bring themselves to say “That’s enough!”
In time, this is likely to prove a significant Achilles Heel for them. When there’s a feminist ‘Justice’ Secretary and Home Secretary actively promoting policies where women who have corrupted children in their care are likely to avoid prison or face nominal sentences, while men will face lengthy jail terms and chemical castration for similar offences… this simply won’t hold up in debate.
The feminists within Labour have already abandoned young working-class girls to the tender mercies of the grooming gangs, because they know it would cost them votes to pursue the underlying causes of the phenomenon.
Now, they seem willing to give a light touch to predatory women who have ruined the lives of young boys. All for the sake of feminist ideology, which always views male life as less ‘worthy’ than a female one. And are therefore willing to castrate male perpetrators.
Keep it up, girls. Men will notice eventually. And, there are new political kids on the block for us to vote for.
LikeLike
To be honest I suspect we are way off anything remotely resembling equal treatment under the law.. In this debate I notice male Politicians have almost literally scrambled over each other to declare their support for “chemical castration” equally likely as female politicos to conjure the horror of “peidos” and “rapists” to virtue signal. in a solidly gynocentric society. Such “treatments” are already used in Secure Hospitals (Broadmoor, Rampton etc.) And offered to inmates of HMPs. Where its more publicly done in the USA and Europe its usually linked to earlier parole. Over my lifetime it is periodically revived as a talking point. I suspect it is just a distraction from the fact the current Government has little to offer by way of big ideas or solutions to the major problems of the day.
It is of course a reminder of one of feminism’s “big lies” that “society condones male violence”. When in fact since the very first law codes “society” has had a whole raft of laws regulating male sexual behaviour with often drakonian punishments . Indeed the fact that there are so many men in prison for such crimes indicates the very dim view society takes of males transgressing these laws. Nor would it be so easy to pursuade men in power a. to reduce fairness in court cases to “get convictions” or to line up to pour scorn on even those accused. After all there never were any laws against lesbian sex (reputedly a suggestion that something similar to the Victorian act (that “got” Oscar Wilde) was dropped because no one dared suggest to Queen Victoria that such a thing existed).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just to remind readers about the scandal 5 years ago where whistleblowers revealed the extent of “sharp practice” by the CPS and especially the Police in getting convictions of men for sexual crimes “up”. Basically by deliberately concealing mobile phone or social media evidence from the courts or introducing it at the last minute in order to wrong foot the defense. Even a BBC Documentary reported the Criminal Bar Associations estimate that this meant 25% of Convictions in the previous 5 years were “unsound”. In the years that followed cases going to court reduced by ………..25%. Presumably because the CPs and Police knew the Courts were alerted to the systematic nature of this practice. This reduction caused furious lobbying by the feminist lobby and this resulted in legislation to prevent the Police even asking for the complainants ‘phone as part of their investigation on the grounds of “privacy”(this concern for privacy of course doesn’t carry through to the accused, even though he’s supposedly innocent till proven guilty). So it is likely that we will see a rise in convictions again. Again meaning 25% of convictions will be “unsafe”. A lot of men in prison (100s) because vital evidence is kept from the Courts.
It is interesting that cases of female perpetration are mounting up in Schools, in Prisons even in Police forces and the military. As women use their power over men in their charge to indulge themselves. For Conservatives as much as feminists this is a hard thing too get to grips with, s deep in out gynocentric culture which places women on moral pedestals.
LikeLiked by 1 person