Today’s video is here (6:36).

Over a period of almost six months we’re posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

At last, some common sense. The two-and-a-half-year marriage collapsed in 2009. An extract:

Lady Justice Black told London’s Appeal Court: “This was a short marriage, though there was of course a child born.

“There was nothing to show that the settlement was unfair.

“This court is not here to provide a top up for every foreign divorce.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Our thanks to Jeff for this.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Our thanks to Jeff for alerting us to this. In response to my recent blog piece Steve Hilton, former Fox News host, is running for California governor as Republican contender. An April Fools hoax by The New York Times, surely? the Daily Mail has printed the following in the Ephraim Hardcastle diary section today (p.17). I should make it clear I was never a Conservative party official, I was a business consultant who worked at their campaign HQ in London over 2006-8 and introduced a new commercial model for the autumn conferences which delivered £11.5+ million to the party’s coffers over 2007-14.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Interesting. I expect Nerys Lloyd will get a light sentence on account of not having previously been in trouble with the law, or for having children, or for simply being a woman (though the last will not be stated, it’s usually implied.) The BBC headline “Paddleboarder was guided to her death, court told” – both the BBC “journalists” are women and refer to a mother as “mum” and a father as “dad” – predictably gives no idea of the sex of the responsible person, and ignores the man who died. No mention is made in the article of Lloyd being a police officer. The Times piece (£) mentions she’s going to be sentenced today.

The end of the BBC piece:

“Nicola Wheatley’s husband Darren called Lloyd “a coward” who had “hidden behind your carefully orchestrated smoke screen”.

He added: “I hugged and kissed Nicola goodbye, she was so trusting. The next time I would see her would be to identify her body in the mortuary.

“This was not the Nicola that left our house less than 24 hours earlier but it is the face I see every day when I open my eyes.”

With audible anger in his voice he said while they “cried all day” that Christmas, Lloyd was posting pictures on social media celebrating Christmas lights with her family and friends. [J4MB emphasis. The four deaths had taken place less than two months previously.]

Lloyd was straight-faced in the dock as Mr Wheatley spoke directly to her.

Ending his speech he said: “Nerys Lloyd you are a vile person and you disgust me.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Today’s video is here (6:20).

Over a period of almost six months we’re posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Good news from China. The authorities have clearly drawn inspiration from the final J4MB general election manifesto, published in 2022. Extracts from the X post about the new Chinese law:

“Property Division Changes: Ownership based on payment: The new law dictates that whoever paid for a property generally retains ownership, even if the other spouse’s name was added to the title after marriage.

Gifts to the husband: Property gifted to the husband by his parents will not be considered shared matrimonial property and will remain his property after divorce…

Child custody: Both parents retain custody of their children after divorce, unless there are extenuating circumstances.

Spousal maintenance: There is generally no spousal maintenance awarded in China after divorce, unless agreed upon by the parties.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Interesting (video, 8:33). The Runcorn and Helsby constituency by-election will be held on 1 May. Hopefully it will result in another Reform UK MP.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Our thanks to Tom for this (video, 0:50).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Sara writes:

“Its a confusing piece of feminist propaganda with a female sexual trigger angle, almost like the sexual fetishmovies “50 shades of grey” or “A handmaids tale”. Thats why its viral. Woman get off talking about it.

Such movies are the female equivalent to porn. Female porn is rather cerebral than optical. They like their “rough stuff” with a “storyline”.

Adolescence paradoxicaly portrays the viewpoint of a young boy. Feminists see men and boys as subhuman and thus cant fathom what they really think. They also dont want to talk to men and dont really care for their view on reality. So every line is essentialy a feminist biased sexually charged fantasy about what a male would say in a certain situation.

The result is, that the main “villain” is like a caricature painted by a radical feminist version of Andrew Tate. Males are depicted almost comicaly evil. Its the female version of the comic book adaptation.

Of course the 13 year old Boy must be misognyist and borderline right wing fascist with very well established and based concept of gender, race, sex, socialism, capitalism. Of course he uses the same points, feminists think red pilled men use. The story cant be too complex for the simple mind of the feminists, which usually is triggered by nuances of good and evil.

Any younger for the “Villain” and it would be considered a comedy. Imagine a movie, where a 10 year old white boy still playing with Lego is depicted as unpredictable menace to society….which grown men/woman takes this serious? Especially if he looks like a frail, below average little boy most peers would bully.

The weak and nerdy apearance dosnt help to emphasize the danger, but rather makes the blatand propaganda lie even more obvious. Its not white frail boys who are the danger but those who arent being portraied. And every english girl knows this and also gets cautioned by her parents who to go with and whom not. Even the non english girls know who the danger is. Uk is a dytopian society in which everyone knows whats going on, but they are so supressed that no one dares to speak out. Such systems usually end in mass murder and demographics of UK seem to indicate that as well.

In my opinion this movie was carefully constructed with a subliminal message of racism and misandry. They tried to piss of the maximum number of people and it seems like it worked out.

The only thing I wonder: Why choose an average frail looking white boy (yes he looks average for a 13 year old, maybe even slightly above) when you could have casted some ugly, predatory looking 15 or 16 year old and just say he is 13.

Seems to me like the main actor was carefully handpicked for some weird sexual reason. In 50 shades of grey the guy is a good looking. In handmaids tale the main male actors are as well looking far above average. Seems to understate the point that in those popular “r***e” fantasies among woman, he must be looking good:D.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.