Our thanks to Nigel for this. He writes:
And here it goes. Under the Government’s new relationships, health and sex education (RHSE) guidance, children starting in primary school will be encouraged to build skills that allow them to “express and understand boundaries, handle disappointment and pay attention to the needs and preferences of oneself and others.”
We know it won’t be girls who’ll have to handle disappointment or pay attention to the needs of others. And “the significance of power” shows the paradigm will be feminist, with boys the “oppressors”. So in fact more of the same. The irony of this is by casting boys as all powerful oppressors and toxic the lessons will successfully make them think no one is remotely interested in their struggles with growing up and they’d be better “never showing emotion and that the world, including women, is against them.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Recognising that feminism was very much on the ascendancy, Sir Keir Starmer has built a career out of throwing men under the bus. The most egregious example of his early work was the Levitt Report (2012) which he co-authored with Alison Levitt QC, claiming that false allegations of rape were 0.6%, while knowing that the real figures, from a range of meta studies, were unlikely ever to fall below 12%. As his strategy of currying favour with the real power behind the throne has served him so well, he is unlikely to rein in the efforts of those in his team, the Shabana Mahmoods, the Yvette Coopers, the Bridget Phillipsons and Jess Phillips of the world, while they strive for the fair, just and equitable societies (code for where women win, ALL of the time) which they wish to impose. Brainwashing young boys into some kind of misogyny-guilt mindset should they dare question the narrative is just the start.
LikeLike
Thanks, great points. If memory serves me correctly, the Levitt report conflated prosecutions for false rape allegations with instances of them.
LikeLike
You are absolutely correct, Mike! As Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions at the time, he weaponised the incompetence of the Department of Public Prosecutions, and their dismal failure to bring such women to ‘justice’ (where they’d face charges of wasting police time, or perjury at most) and turned this abject failure into a ‘success’, attempting to reassure men that they had nothing to worry about. Feminists, of course, are very keen that women should be portrayed as innocent, blameless creatures, and have ensured that the Levitt Report has become the ‘Gold Standard’ of reference to false accusation stats. Starmer, meanwhile, has gone on to greater heights, using his winning formula of weaponised incompetence and fact-lite propaganda.
LikeLike
Thanks. I note that William Collins covered the report on p.524 onwards of “The Empathy Gap”.
LikeLike