Paul Elam’s reflections on the XY Crew Jamboree ’24 (Des Moines, Iowa)

Paul has just published this, full text here:

“You’re hosting a hate group here,” she said, pointing to the sign. “I don’t feel comfortable coming out of my room.” That line, an unmistakable threat narrative, was delivered to the front desk of the hotel by a twenty-something woman, referring to the welcome poster for XY Crew that rested on an easel in the lobby.

At least that’s what happened according to hotel management, who had earlier welcomed us openly and graciously, but who were now being put in a no-win situation. To their credit, they found another hotel for the woman, away from the danger she imagined was lurking outside her door. On our end, we were made to remove the poster, lowering our profile. And once again to the management’s credit, that was the last we heard of it. We were treated well and kind for the duration of our weeklong stay.

That’s how XY Crew’s Jamboree ’24 in Des Moines, Iowa began. And despite the minor disappointment, it didn’t dampen spirits in any significant way. After all, we were red pill men. We’ve become accustomed to that kind of damseling, to manufactured threat narratives, to demonization, hatred, and lies. So, we didn’t take it to heart. It was sad, but not shocking; just more of the blue pill world, revealing its trademark insanity whenever men dare to congregate around their own interests.

It did cause me a moment of consideration, though. I don’t know if I’d ever stopped to really consider what the average red pill guy was like.  I mean, I always knew we weren’t the melodramatic caricatures of evil that the blue pill left is so fond of creating.  We’re not the monsters of the twenty-something woman’s paranoid fantasies. Nor are we the snickering, moustache twirling bigots that the SPLC has conjured up to raise money from highly disturbed and ironically bigoted people.

But who is the average red pill guy, really? What’s typical? Well, I just spent a week hanging out in a group of them from breakfast to bedtime every day. I’d like to give you a summary of what I experienced and observed over that week, and what it meant to me as a man, in particular a Christian man.

And trust me, I know, I’m singing to the choir here. That’s kind of the point. One of the many things I got out of this gathering was badly needed time with the choir, some casual and relaxed time with likeminded men who had removed the socially imposed muzzle and spurned the life of fawning over women.

And at first blush, that would seem to be the primary common attribute in the men at our gathering. We were all men with a unique and unifying worldview. We understood terms like gynocentrism, romantic chivalry, and their profound influence on the life of average men. We shared an understanding of the actual nature of women, not the sugar and spice fairy tale of mainstream sensibilities. And regarding women, we had long since ditched the idea of finding our worth in their service. We were men who understood, perhaps too well, that romance was a lot more than infatuation and sexual passion. We’d been on that train, and had ridden it right into the distorted, carnivalesque freak show of the western woman’s hypergamous desires.

Men in our lot, red pill men, usually aren’t moved to sit around and discuss these concepts. We’ve already lived through them. We got the t-shirt and wore it out and replaced it many times over. So, we did the kind of things men will do when they gather without women in the mix, fouling things up. We shot large caliber weapons, competitively, of course. And we threw axes, competitively, of course. We smoked cigars and grilled copious amounts of meat. We rented a cabin and sat around a fire pit at night, talking for hours on end, little of it about women.

There was something about men being gathered around the fire talking as a perfect moon lifted above the horizon into the cloudless night sky. It was something primal and deeply familiar, though I lack the words to describe it fairly. It was as though with each crackle and pop, each dancing flame, you could feel the history in it. Men around a fire, bonded in healthy tribalism, a picture that stretches back far into the deepest recesses of antiquity.

It was a scene that invited conversation and connection, as though those things had always been as much a part of the fire as smoke and glowing embers.

Now, you’d think with a bunch of red pill men, there would be some trashing of women; some relentless critique of their selfish, unaccountable nature, and of course some well-deserved hostility for the society that allows and enables their destructive ways. I suppose there was a bit of that. Honesty demands it. And the men around that fire were honest, if anything.  

But those things, the grievances of living as a man in a gynocentric world, weren’t the focus of our connection to each other. Instead, the revelation of our innermost selves came out in bits and pieces, in poignant, often painful vignettes, as the fire cast its red glow on our faces. And what those things revealed didn’t point to a group of angry, bitter or hostile men of the twenty-something woman’s fearful imagination. Rather what emerged was a sense of loss so profound, so utterly crushing, that it is rarely uttered, even in a group of men who trust each other to listen.

Aye, it wasn’t anger or resentment that connected us to each other. It was grief. Men still mourning the loss of children; children who would not even acknowledged they were alive, courtesy of the mother’s alienating scheme. Men who had dedicated their entire lives to marriages and families, only to feel the sting of betrayal as the knives were slipped into their backs. Men who had loved, as deeply and intensely as any woman, only to be discarded with casual ease when they failed to elevate her sufficiently, or when they dared to inject their own needs into the marriage.

We were all connected by our grief over the romantic lie. Like all men, we had invested in the belief that romance, which elevates women to a near divine status, would ensure their loyalty, dedication, and affection. We were a gathering of Sir Galahads, flattened by reality and quietly licking our wounds out of the blue pill world’s judgmental sight. We were men who had once believed that, like us, women were bound to a romantic ethos of enduring, reciprocal love. That formed, I dare say, a core component of our identity as men. Being disabused of that romantic myth was a gut-punch that we were still contending with around that fire.

So, what did I make of these men? Well, truth tell I saw a bit of Jesus in every last one of them. They were truthful, loving men, demonized by the world around them, men whose love was returned with hate and scorn, men whose honesty and truth-telling was considered dangerous, men who the world would gladly nail to a cross, but will settle for calling them part of a hate group.

I can’t say we were a Christian group. Though we had Christians among us, we also had secular men, non believers. But I saw more Christlike qualities in them all than I’ve ever seen in the average Christian man that I’ve met in a church. More compassion, more humility, more forgiveness, more patience and indeed, more love. And I saw and abundance of the kind of sadness that Jesus must have felt about the world He was sent to die for.

It reminded me that it’s not your alleged beliefs that define you. Your actions in life are your legacy, not your words.

So, what is the average red pill man like? Well, you’re welcome to form your own opinion. As for me, the red pill man is the only brother I’ve got left. And right now, that feels just fine to me.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

‘We did it!’ Next shop workers win equal pay claim.

Madness on stilts. The start of the BBC piece:

“More than 3,500 current and former workers at Next have won the final stage of a six-year legal battle for equal pay.

An employment tribunal said store staff, who are predominantly women, should not have been paid at lower rates than employees in warehouses, where just over half the staff are male.

Lawyers for the shop staff described the judgement as “hugely significant” and the amount of back-pay owed could amount to more than £30m.

However, Next said it would appeal against the ruling.

Next argued that pay rates for warehouse workers were higher than for retail workers in the wider labour market, justifying the different rates at the company.

But the employment tribunal rejected that argument as a justification for the pay difference.” [J4MB emphasis]

The employment tribunal clearly consists of blithering idiots, probably mostly female blithering idiots. Anyone who thinks there’s an equivalence between store jobs and warehouse jobs cannot have spent much time in warehouses. Warehouse jobs are a great deal more physically and mentally demanding, and often include responsibility for operating expensive equipment. From what I’ve seen, store ‘work’ seems to mainly involve chatting with other store workers, which is surely why the work appeals to women so much.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Violent offenders let off if they say sorry. Concern as community resolutions rise, with even those accused of knife and sex offences avoiding criminal record.

Appalling (Telegraph, £), but an utterly predictable consequence of the feminisation of the police force. Every profession which has become feminised has become more costly and less efficient and effective than before.

Over 147,000 people accused of offences in the year to March were given community resolutions, which don’t result in a criminal record. Elsewhere we learn that police have all but given up trying to stop shoplifters, with the obvious result that it’s becoming ever more common.

More than 147,000 people accused of offences including sex crimes, violence and weapons possession were given community resolutions in the year to March instead of being prosecuted. Such resolutions do not result in a criminal record. 

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Video / audio #547 from our archives: Robert Brockway’s live Q&A (ICMI21)

We’re linking daily to selected video / audio files from our YouTube channel. Today’s file is here (video, 42:45).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Peter Alleman’s response to Gerry Alexander’s ICMI21 talk

Gerry Alexander’s ICMI talks have been among the highlights of ICMIs in recent years. They are:

ICMI20 – The Maturity Gender Gap (37:22)

ICMI21 – The Garden of Eve (42:50)

ICMI24 – Feminism’s Role in Population Control (49:07)

We’ve just published some comments on Gerry’s latest video from Peter Alleman, an American. It takes up the remainder of this blog piece:

“What a well-structured, thought-provoking presentation! Mr. Alexander has done a fine job of providing a detailed explanation — supplemented by references — for my own re-conceiving of feminism.

For many reasons, in the 1990s, I became involved in the men’s movement — and I even co-founded the Greater New York Chapter of the National Coalition For Men. Founded in 1977, NCFM is the largest general-issues men’s rights group in the U.S.A., if not the world. Its initial purpose was partly to address the mostly-ignored issues confronting men and boys and partly to provide a counter-narrative to the blaming-and-shaming tactics (and outright lies) of second wave feminism. One of the most worthwhile books I read on these topics was by a member of NCFM’s Board of Advisors, Warren Farrell: The Myth of Male Power (1993). Dr. Farrell supports his observations with documented evidence — not ideological theories — and much of his research continues to be valid today in the 21st century. Eventually, however, I realized that Dr. Farrell’s proposals for “what to do” about men’s issues (and how to respond to feminism) had little prospect for successful outcomes. The problem was much greater than I ever suspected (and one book that helped me understand this was Diana West’s American Betrayal (2013)).

The problem was not “misguided feminism” (as Christina Hoff Sommers calls it in her book The War Against Boys (2000)), but something much more sinister and destructive. If women and girls experienced issues that merited compassionate corrective action, The Powers That Shouldn’t Be had no real interest in ameliorating gender-specific problems that females experienced. Those powers cruelly sought to exacerbate those problems — and wreak destruction in the lives not only of the men and boys targeted for scoffing and ridiculing, but in the lives of girls and women as well.

Indeed, I eventually came to perceive feminism not so much as a social movement (whether misguided or not). I came to perceive the feminist movement as one of many facets of the overarching scheme by The Powers That Shouldn’t Be to demoralize people, to deny reality, and to tear down longstanding cultural institutions that have evolved over centuries.

Mainstream articles downplay the involvement of the C.I.A. in the advancement of second wave feminism (e.g., “Gloria Steinem and the CIA,” published in the 2/21/1967 edition of The New York Times). There might have been a time when I would have considered the C.I.A.’s involvement as inconsequential. Today, however, I suspect that it is highly significant, and I suspect that the feminist movement has been no more a “grassroots” movement than the present-day transgender movement.

I believe that Mr. Alexander is correct in his assessment of “the tendency of monopolists who start thinking about what’s best for the people”: the tendency is “to see themselves as superior to the people they say they’re trying to help.”

This tendency continues into the present, and there is abundant evidence that present-day monopolists — equipped with new technology — are deploying novel ways to promote depopulation and social control.

This is the argument of Oxford-educated David A. Hughes, Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Lincoln in England. It took Dr. Hughes three years to write a book about his research findings. It is called “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy: Volume 1, and it was published early this year. The book is triple-peer-reviewed and issued by a world-class academic publisher, Palgrave Macmillan.

Dr. Hughes (and others) regard the book as so important that Dr. Hughes was able to acquire a £16K grant (equivalent to a little over US$20K) to make PDF and EPUB versions legally downloadable for free. See: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-41850-1

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

William Collins: “A Gentleman’s Strike” (reflections on Stephen Baskerville’s ‘marriage strike’ proposal)

A lengthy but absorbing piece concerning the “marriage strike” proposal in Stephen Baskerville’s latest book (spoiler alert, it’s not the same as MGTOW). I’ve posted the following comments and fully expect many of the followers of this blog not to agree with them. Please feel free to comment, as always.

“Excellent, thanks! As the author of “The Fraud of the Rings” I’d like to point out that I wrote at some length in the book about the need for serious preparation for marriage. In my experience most couples give more thought to the wedding day than to the 70+ years that may follow it. Had I undertaken such preparations before my second marriage, I wouldn’t have married. With the benefit of hindsight, the marriage was never going to be a lengthy or happy one.

I would argue for comprehensive preparation for marriage, with an outsider being the sole judge of whether a couple’s marriage is likely to succeed, being pre-conditions for being handed a wedding licence. The divorce rate would fall like a stone.

Mike Buchanan
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

LET’S SLAY DARTS! Darts walk-on girls returning to TV for first time in six and a half years after controversial axing.

Happy days are here again. It lifts the spirits to reflect on feminists’ heads exploding at this news.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Mandatory paternity testing at birth – at last!!!

Our thanks to Paolo for this wonderful news from Tennessee. We’ve been calling for mandatory paternity testing at birth since we launched as a political party in 2013.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Video / audio #546 from our archives: Hannah Wallen’s Q&A (ICMI21)

We’re linking daily to selected video / audio files from our YouTube channel. Today’s file is here (video, 45:00).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X (formerly Twitter) channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.