Hilarious. The start of the piece:
“Nearly 20 per cent of Australian men believe that feminism should be violently resisted, if necessary, new research from the University of Melbourne and the University of Queensland has found.
For their newly published report, researchers surveyed 1,020 people from across Australia and found that misogynistic beliefs were a significant predictor of most forms of violent extremism. The researchers also found if authorities recognised anti-feminist beliefs as a separate form of violent extremism, it would represent the most prevalent form of violent extremism in Australia today.
Among men surveyed, 19.4 per cent believed it was legitimate to violently resist feminism and over 30 per cent of all respondents agreed or slightly agreed with statements expressing hostile sexist views.
Report author University of Melbourne’s Dr Sara Meger said the results showed the urgent need for security and policing agencies to take misogynistic and racist attitudes seriously as predictors of violent extremism, regardless of ideological or religious motivations.”
Eagle-eyed readers of the piece may spot that not one example of “radical anti-feminist violent extremism” is cited. Yet it’s the most prevalent form of “violent extremism” in Australia, says Dr. Sara Meger. Even by radfem standards the woman is clearly batshit insane.
Justice for Men & Boys 
l like the idea that “slightly agree” with “sexist’ remarks. Is the precursor to violent extremism! Inevitably we’ll see loads of this here as labour uses the Istanbul declaration to stifle any opposition to feminist ideology. Just last night on ITV news a segment on “violence against women” , where the evidence was filmed of a reporter kitted out on the tightest Emma Peel leather outfit literally strutting up and down in a clubland. The “violence” consisting of three different men approaching her the last one even apologising ‘Lm too persistent aren’t I,ll go”. A nuisance maybe but hardly “violence”
LikeLike