Enjoy. From the section on people being barred from public houses for their views:
“We have a similar case in Newcastle, in which one of our female members was informed in writing by her local, The Cumberland Arms, that despite being a regular patron since, ironically enough, 1984, she was now barred.
Her crime? Wearing a hoody which bore a feminist slogan. We’ve since written to The Cumberland Arms noting that we think they may have acted unlawfully and we hope to have some good news to share about this case shortly.”
Intriguingly, and perhaps significantly, the piece doesn’t reveal what the “feminist slogan” was. “I drink male tears”, possibly? A hoody for girls aged 3-13 with the slogan “I Drink Male Tears for Breakfast” is on sale here. What kind of a vile mother would buy such a thing for her young daughter? A feminist one, obviously.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.
If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
maybe the slogan was reference to “women = adult female” ?
if it was something more vile such as the tshirt pointed out by mike in this post, then I would imagine that the free speech union would have to tread a fine line…
LikeLike
Increasingly the FSU appears to spend its time and resources dealing with cases of “gender critical” views. It is deeply ironic that it seems to be that feminists, long advocates of “no platforming” anyone they don’t agree with(a good example being Will Knowland at Eton for even suggesting there may be merit in manly virtues), now need the FSU to help them in their fights with “gender studies” graduates who take feminism to its logical place of gender being a matter of “performance” rather than rooted in biology (Will Knowland’s “crime” was to suggest biology did play a role). I’m begining to wonder if the FSU is is simply following a gynocentric course as many of those women they defend seem to have ample resources and rarely seem “silenced”. Certainly non of the “gender critical” feminists are any friends of males in general as their primary argument appears to be that all males are inherently sexual predators and must be considered a threat. I do wonder that Toby is one of a long tradition of alowing his innner conservative white knight to lead him down a path of giving feminists the tools to fight their battles for them.
LikeLike
Thanks Nigel, agreed. I cannot recall the FSU ever challenging feminists in general, or TERFS in particular.
LikeLike