“I should’ve stabbed him more”, Penelope Jackson, 66, wife accused of the murder of her husband (78)

Our thanks to William Collins for this (video, 3:48). We can be sure Justice for Women and other feminist groups will automatically believe her likely claims of coercive control and seek to ensure she isn’t punished for the murder.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

SPAIN: Female literary sensation is unmasked as a trio of men

A hilarious piece in today’s Times. You can subscribe to the paper here.

Spain’s richest literary prize has gone to a novel thought to have been written by a woman touted as the country’s answer to Elena Ferrante. She was then revealed to be three male television scriptwriters.

The €1 million Planeta Prize went to a trio who used the pen name Carmen Mola for violent crime thrillers about a female detective who loves grappa, karaoke and sex in SUVs. Agustín Martínez, Jorge Díaz and Antonio Mercero had initially submitted The Beast under the pseudonym Sergio López, which was subsequently revealed to be Mola. As a third act of revelation, the three writers unmasked themselves.

“We were tired of lying. That’s why we thought of coming out of the closet in style,” Díaz told El Mundo.

The literary deception did not delight everybody. Beatriz Gimeno, who represents the left-wing Podemos party on Madrid’s regional assembly, described the authors as scammers.

“This is the worst for me. It wasn’t just a name. They lied by pretending to be a woman, not just a pseudonym,” she wrote on Twitter.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Buxton Battle of Ideas Festival, 30 October

I am pleased to announce that we’ll be manning (should that be “personning”?) a stand at the Buxton Battle of Ideas Festival on 30 October. Event website here, you can order your tickets (£0 – £25) here.

I’m looking forward to meeting up again with the lovely Elizabeth Hobson, the erstwhile leader of this party (May 2019 – March 2020) and the devilishly handsome Steve Moxon, author of a number of important books, my personal favourite being The Woman Racket (2008), the book which did more than any other to make me red-pilled. I read it in 2009, it put me on the path I’m still on today.

I would encourage you to come along, it will surely be a memorable day, and we may possibly have a drink or two at a local hostelry afterwards. One of the key people behind the event is Professor Dennis Hayes, an interviewee at both ICMI20 and ICMI21.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Laura Amherst, Extinction Rebellion’s topless protester, goes on hunger strike

Interesting…


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Declining birth rates

Our thanks to Stu for this by a feminist writing for Huffpo. He writes:

Hi Mike,

Did you come across this subject? I heard about it on Talk Radio earlier, Christo suggesting there was a lot of debate around the issue concerning declining birth rates, women putting off having children till later in life.

With a growing number of unfortunate men reasonably concluding that the risk of fatherhood, along with cohabitation, marriage, relationships with women in general are simply not worth the effort. This may be a conversation for J4MB.

The HuffPo article links to the original Times article, and makes predictable arguments.

When it comes to fertility, the female students of Cambridge are strong independent women again (at a women-only college), not a vulnerable student amongst them, this is reassuring.

All the best

Stuart


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Revised dates for ICMI21

A decision has been taken to move the conference back four weeks. The revised dates are 10:00 GMT, Monday, 13 December, to 12:00 GMT, Sunday, 19 December. We were originally planning up to 72 speakers or interviewees in two parallel streams, most of the videos being followed by live Q&A sessions. It’s now been decided to hold the event in one stream, which has doubled the conference duration from three to six days.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

The Free Speech Union: Weekly News Round-Up

Dear Mike Buchanan,

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter, our round-up of the free speech news of the week. The last week has seen a concerted attack on the academic freedom of a professor of philosophy, with the University and College Union joining in on the side of the censors. Encourage a friend or family member to sign-up today, or help us turn the tide against cancel culture with a donation to our fighting fund.

Professor Kathleen Stock told she needs bodyguards after campaign to oust her

Kathleen Stock, a professor of philosophy at Sussex, has been advised to install CCTV outside her home and told she may need bodyguards if she sets foot back on her university campus following a campaign of bullying and intimidation by a group calling itself Anti-Terf Sussex. Her sin, according to those trying to silence her, is to stand up for sex-based women’s rights, i.e., she doesn’t think transwomen should be treated as if they’re indistinguishable from women in all areas. In the eyes of militant trans activists and their allies, this makes Professor Stock a ‘TERF’ – a trans exclusionary radical feminist.

The students behind the campaign have been widely criticised, including by Baroness Falkner, the Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and our founder, Toby Young. Writing in the Mail, he described the treatment meted out to Professor Stock as “cancel culture at its absolute worst”. We have written to the Vice-Chancellor of Sussex asking him to defend her, which he has. You can read our letter and his reply here.

There was condemnation of the campaign against the professor from across the political spectrum. Writing in the Telegraph, Suzanne Moore said it was an “almighty relief” to hear the Vice-Chancellor of Sussex University defending the “untrammelled right” of Sussex academics to “say and believe what they think”. An editorial in the Times said the threats to Professor Stock were “intolerable”. In a second article, Moore argued that the issue at stake is not trans rights, but the freedom to express views that criticise current transgender orthodoxy. The Women’s Organisation has called for a public inquiry into the bullying of people who challenge woke dogma on sex and gender.

It’s worth bearing in mind that not all trans people share the hostility of trans activists towards feminists like Professor Stock. Sixteen trans people wrote a letter to the Times defending her right to academic freedom and condemning the student campaign against her. The letter said: “Attacks on the freedom of expression are not progressive and do nothing to fight against actual prejudice or win better services for trans people.”

“When balaclava-clad protestors have forced a female academic to stay off campus under threats of physical violence, what more evidence do you need” that the free speech crisis is real, asked the Universities Minister Michelle Donelan in an article for the Times. Miriam Cates MP – a former biology teacher with a degree in genetics – has written in the Telegraph: “There is nothing tolerant or democratic about activism that results in a respected academic requiring bodyguards to go to work.”

Janice Turner argued in her Times column that the silent majority must defy the militant minority of students who want to silence debate and dissent. She said that “unscientific, magical thinking has become sacrosanct” in the trans debate, with disastrous consequences for scholars like Professor Stock. Josephine Bartosch said in UnHerd that feminist “dinosaurs” – as they were branded by David Lammy MP – are now getting organised. Julie Bindel called on liberals to stand with Professor Stock. Joanna Williams wrote in Spiked that Stock is the only real victim of “hate” in this scenario. She notes that Stock had decided to withdraw from a panel at the Battle of Ideas festival that they would both have spoken on. Susanna Rustin wrote in the Guardian that the escalating rhetoric around trans issues has made reasoned debate increasingly difficult. Addressing trans campaigners she says: “I want to find a way for our different ideas to coexist. But I am very worried by the lack of an equivalent recognition of gender-critical beliefs. And I think the most recent round of attacks on feminists should alarm everyone who cares about pluralism.”

University and College Union failed to defend Stock, and called for investigation into “transphobia”

The Sussex branch of the University and College Union (UCU) has been accused by Stock of effectively ending her career at Sussex after it sent a statement to its members saying that “all trans and non-binary members of our community” should “receive the unequivocal support of the university and its management” and calling for an investigation into transphobia. An open letter for academics, university staff, students and alumni who support Professor Stock is being circulated and has attracted hundreds of signatures, as reported in the Times. But the Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities, Taiwo Owatemi MP, has defended UCU’s statement.

Josephine Bartosch mentioned our work in an article in the Critic on the failure of unions to defend free speech. Toby told her: “One of the original purposes of trade unions in the 19th century was to defend the speech rights of workers so they could criticise their bosses without being fired. Unfortunately, the vast majority of unions have lost sight of that in the past 25 years, with the UCU being the most egregious example. I would urge any academic concerned about their intellectual freedom to join the Free Speech Union instead. It’s much cheaper and we will actually stand up for the speech rights of our members.” The union’s betrayal of Professor Stock and academic freedom “signals the death of solidarity”, said Timandra Harkness in UnHerd.

Historian Dominic Sandbrook said in the Mail that Stock is an unlikely freedom fighter but now “at our universities, unfortunately, it’s the radical activists who set the tone, denouncing doubters in the most violent terms” as trade unions abandon their members and academic freedom. He said UCU head Jo Grady is “either extremely stupid or extremely disingenuous” to deny that there is a threat to academic freedom. He wrote: “We should ask ourselves what kind of country we want to live in. One ruled by an intolerant minority of cranks and obsessives? Or one that defends to the death a clever woman’s right to think what she likes?”

Joan Smith wrote in UnHerd: “Trades unions are meant to stand up for people who are being bullied at work. But that clearly doesn’t apply to the University and College Union, an organisation so steeped in extreme gender ideology that its Sussex branch has decided to join in the attacks on a philosophy lecturer.” The Guardian reported on the failure of the UCU to unequivocally defend Stock. Meanwhile the Edinburgh branch of UCU has said its members can “self-identify” as “black, disabled, LGBT+ or women”.

Professor Matthew Goodwin of our Advisory Council said of the Stock case on Twitter: “It is line in the sand time. If you are an academic with a public profile on social media & you are not calling out abuse, bullying & harassment of other academics – even if you disagree with their views – then you are enabling it. We either believe in academic freedom or we don’t.” If you need our support doing just that, you can contact us.

The Cambridge Students Union, meanwhile, has launched a witch hunter-style “Terf-spotting” guide which tells students to “keep an eye out” for people who believe sex is binary.

Human rights scholar fled home following Islamic Society campaign against him

We’re also helping Steven Greer, a law professor at Bristol. He and his wife had to flee their home for several days after a “vicious” campaign by the University Islamic Society targeting him for highlighting the treatment of women under sharia. Professor Greer spoke to the Mail on Sunday about the ordeal and expressed his concern that going public could potentially put him in danger again.

We were contacted by a student at Aston University about a guide given to all first-year students in the social sciences and humanities that contained a lengthy list of proscribed words and phrases, including “manmade”, “mixed race” and even the word British. We wrote to the Vice-Chancellor in protest and our letter was reported in the Times. The story was also reported in the Daily Mail and by Breitbart.

Sophie Corcoran, a first year student at Durham, said in Country Squire that she “never quite realised how bad” left-wing indoctrination in universities was going to be until she had to undergo compulsory “training” on white privilege, unconscious bias and colonialism in a compulsory induction course for freshers which nobody present was able to question.

Meanwhile, students at Edinburgh are being paid £15 an hour to vet course materials “through the lenses of equality, diversity and inclusion”. The job advert for the post said applicants should have “an interest in decolonising the curriculum” and a “a strong commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion”. Stuart Waiton wrote that Scottish universities are failing the test when it comes to free thinking and free expression.

A new plaque accompanying the Cecil Rhodes statue at Oriel College has “distorted” his legacy, critics have said. Toby weighed in on this controversy in his Spectator column this week.

School bans the words “good” and “bad”

Toby also appeared on TalkRadio to warn of the “totalitarian direction” society was heading in as more and more words and phrases end up on the banned list. The latest example he cited was a school that has banned teachers from using the words “good” and “bad” when appraising pupils’ homework. His comments were reported in the Express.

Jonathan Gullis MP has said that teachers who use the term “white privilege” should face a disciplinary investigation or even be referred to Prevent. He said: “The classroom is a place to impart knowledge, not to impart political ideology of the teacher standing in front of you.” Michael Deacon writes that the MP, in his zeal to end cancel culture, is in danger of advocating the cancellation of teachers whom he disagrees with.

Stonewall investigated by the BBC

BBC journalist Stephen Nolan has carried out an investigation into Stonewall’s vast influence, including its hold over the BBC via the Stonewall Champions scheme in which taxpayer-funded organisations pay Stonewall to rate their LGBT policies. We published a report into the scheme earlier this year. Robin Aitken asks in the Critic why the BBC ever gave money to the lobby group in the first place.

Cervical cancer awareness campaign undermined by refusal to say “women”

The Scottish government has been told that a cervical cancer public health campaign has been undermined by its refusal to use the word “women”. Despite almost half of women polled in 2017 being unable to identify the cervix as the neck of the womb, the campaign refers only to “anyone with a cervix” instead of addressing women directly.

Female prisoners can be punished for refusing to call biologically male prisoners by “correct” pronouns under new government policy

Women prisoners could face extra jail time if they use the wrong pronouns to refer to transgender prisoners, a justice minister has said. Lord Wolfson said an “honest mistake” would probably not result in disciplinary action but deliberate refusal to use a trans prisoner’s preferred pronouns would. Dr Kate Coleman has pointed out that these rules could mean a female prisoner who suffered sexual harassment or violence from a male prisoner who self-identified as a woman would be obliged to describe her attacker as “her” or “she”.

Meanwhile, the Government is being sued over its transgender guidelines for schools by a couple who felt they had no choice but to withdraw their children from a Church of England school for its insistence on affirming the decision of a six-year-old to wear a dress and identify as a girl. We can confirm that this is not the same child who appears in the latest John Lewis ad which, bizarrely, has upset ultra-woke viewers.

The Ministry of Defence has published an “inclusive language guide”. It says civil servants should not label colleagues as “slow” but rather “have compassion for different working styles”, that sex is “assigned at birth” (referring staff to Stonewall for more information) and that “his or her” should be replaced with “their”. In other news, the Home Office has cancelled a forthcoming Black History Month talk by Cambridge academic Dr Priyamvada Gopal after Guido Fawkes pointed out she’d accused Priti Patel of harbouring “ferociously anti-black attitudes” in a tweet comparing her to a colonial administrator. Dr Gopal now claims to be the victim of cancel culture, even though, up until now, she’s adamantly maintained that cancel culture is an invention of the far right. She is welcome to reach out to the Free Speech Union if she’d like our help.

The Government has specified that the Pride flag, which can be flown from public buildings, must consist of six vertical coloured stripes, and not the “the super-woke LGBTQIBLMA+ flag”, reports Guido Fawkes.

British Airways is to drop the term “ladies and gentlemen” from its announcements in case the phrase offends trans people.

The constant “quiet cancellations”

Instagram has censored a post by biologist and Quillette editor Colin Wright that highlighted scientific evidence that men are, on average, stronger than women. Julie Bindel has highlighted the constant “quite cancellations” of women and girls in the current “fearful climate of cancel culture”. Ella Whelan said in a book review in Spiked: “Unlike radical movements of the past, the trans activism [Shon Faye] promotes has less to do with convincing people to come round to her point of view and more to do with characterising all dissent as a form of emotional abuse.”

TV, art, culture, comedy

Telegraph cartoonist Bob Moran has been sacked for a Twitter post that seemed to encourage people to verbally abuse the NHS doctor and lockdown advocate Rachel Clarke, comments for which he subsequently apologised. He posted a lengthy personal statement on Twitter about the events leading up to his outburst. If you would like to work with Bob you can contact him on bob@bobmoran.co.uk.

Kevin Maher has written about the “cultural quagmire” that prevents male novelists from writing about women. Jane Shilling said the idea that novelists should “stay in their lane” is a non-starter, with the real issue being how convincing their efforts are. Another artist attacked for not having the relevant “lived experience” is the actor Eddie Redmayne who got into trouble for deciding to play a “queer” character in Cabaret in spite of being heterosexual.

The comedian Dave Chappelle is “cancel-proof”, said Dominic Cavendish in the Telegraph. Brendan O’Neill said Chappelle’s lack of nerves when joking about trans issues was “unnerving” in the current cultural climate. Trans writer Debbie Hayton argued in the Spectator that Chappelle is not “transphobic”. Sir Billy Connolly thinks he’d be cancelled if he was just starting out now. Dominic Maxwell has written about the difficulty of being a comedian in the woke age.

Generation Z have abandoned the BBC, argued James Innes-Smith in the Spectator, in part because its efforts to reach “young people” amount to an obsession with “gender, race, sexuality, identity and the environment”.

Miscellany

Jamie Gillies has called on the government to bring in age verification for internet porn under the provisions in the Digital Economy Act. He has also criticised the forthcoming Online Safety Bill, claiming its concept of “online harms” is too broad and, as a consequence, is likely to imperil free speech, not to mention fail to protect children from extreme pornography.

Amazon has agreed to publish a book by a Nazi-sympathiser in a deal that gives the retail giant 85% of the profits.

The leadership of the National Trust is being challenged by an anti-woke internal campaign group called the Restore Trust, according to the Times.

Rampant cancel culture in US universities

Music professor Bright Sheng may have survived China’s Cultural Revolution, but he’s been laid low by the woke mob. His sin was to show the 1965 version of Othello, in which Laurence Olivier wore blackface. He has been forced to resign from his post at the University of Michigan. Brendan O’Neill says the cultural revolution is out of control.

Professor Dorian Abbot, a geophysicist at the University of Chicago, had an invitation to speak at MIT rescinded after a student campaign because he had the temerity to argue that academic appointments should be based solely on merit. Yascha Mounk has written about this episode in the Atlantic, saying the no-platforming shows how censorship is “continuing to morph and expand”. The Academic Freedom Alliance, a pro-free speech group of academics, arranged for him to give his speech at Princeton instead and it went ahead to a packed auditorium. We launched a successful petition to help Professor Abbot last year when activists at Chicago tried to cancel him.

Australian scientist loses High Court case

Dr Peter Ridd – sacked from James Cook University in 2018 for claiming the Great Barrier Reef was not in imminent danger because of global warming – has lost a High Court battle against his former employers in Australia. You can read his statement here.

FSU support for blocked chaplain noted

Our support for Father David Palmer was mentioned in the National Catholic Register. He was blocked by Nottingham University from taking up his post at chaplain because of his social media posts opposing abortion and euthanasia, but the decision was reversed following our intervention.

Forthcoming comedy nights

We are delighted to announce that we’ll be hosting two comedy nights in association with Comedy Unleashed, the home of free-thinking comedy. Join us in London on Wednesday 10th November and Wednesday 15th December, when the line-ups will include the brilliant Leo Kearse, Nick Dixon, Tania Edwards, Tony Law, Dominic Frisby, Mark Dolan, Vanity Von Glow and many more. The line-ups are different on each night, so feel free to come to both!

Booking details were emailed to FSU members earlier this week. Tickets are sure to sell out, so join the FSU now before it’s too late!

“Wokus Dei: The Cult That Conquered the West” with Professor Frank Furedi

Also exclusive to FSU members, join us on Monday 25th October for our fourth Online Speakeasy, when Dr Jan Macvarish, our Education and Events Director, will be in conversation with prolific author, sociologist and cultural commentator Professor Frank Furedi, exploring the ‘woke’ cult. How did it acquire such velocity in such a short time and capture so many of our most prestigious institutions? Booking details for “Wokus Dei: The Cult That Conquered the West” will be emailed soon to members. If you want to take part in this discussion, join the FSU today.

Sharing the Newsletter

You can share our newsletters on social media with the buttons below to help us spread the word. If someone has shared this newsletter with you and you’d like to join the FSU, you can find our website here.

If you know of someone who’s been penalised for exercising their lawful right to free speech, or been discouraged from doing so by a school, university or employer, please get in touch with our case team here.

Best wishes,

Benjamin Jones

@BenBarryJones

Case Officer


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

The Calcutta Brasserie, Stony Stratford

OK, this blog post will be a little different from our normal fare.

Between the ages of 7-16 I attended two all-boy Roman Catholic boarding schools, because my parents were abroad – my late father worked for the Foreign Office and moved from one country to another every two or three years – and it was the only viable way to receive a good education. My memories of those years are very positive, they prepared me well for my current life as a full-time MRA.

The first of the two schools was St Anthony’s Preparatory School in Stony Stratford, near Milton Keynes. The town’s main claim to fame has always been as the source of the Cock & Bull story.

The school owned extensive lands which today would be worth a fortune. But it closed its doors in the 1980s, and the church has since become a restaurant, The Calcutta Brasserie. It is without doubt my favourite restaurant in the UK, simply outstanding. They published this video (1:42) in 2017. Enjoy, and – more importantly – book a meal there.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

California becomes first state to ban ‘stealthing’: Victims will be able to sue for criminal battery if partner removes a condom without consent during sex

Our thanks to Gerry for this. He writes:

Here is one you might have missed. The point being that women who trick men into unprotected sex – a VASTLY more common thing, usually the result of alleging to have taken oral contraceptives, when they haven’t – face no consequences even when a baby is conceived.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Bettina Arndt: “Campus rape” lies, damned lies and statistics

Bettina writes:

Campus lies, damned lies and statistics

New efforts to manufacture a campus rape crisis

What does it say about our country that a student writing to me doesn’t dare give his name for fear his letter could be traced back to him?

Concerned Student wrote to me last month after being asked to complete the National Student Safety Survey, which has just been distributed to over 400,000 random students on our campuses:

“As I was completing the survey, I was shocked and alarmed at how the survey had seemingly been deliberately constructed in a way likely to produce results that will exaggerate perceived rates of sexual violence on campus and thereby distort and manipulate public opinion and policy. The authors have applied definitions of sexual assault and harassment that are so broad they conflate normal interactions between men and women with heinous and brutal acts of violence. This is an injustice to survivors.”

Concerned Student very helpfully sent screen shots of all the questions he responded to in the survey. And he’s on the money. The National Safety Survey is all about cooking the books – asking biased, leading questions aimed at proving there’s a rape crisis on our campuses.

The activists are having another go following their disappointment over the 2016 million-dollar survey from Australian Human Rights Commission which found only 0.8 percent of students reported any type of “sexual assault” per year, even including incidents such as a grope from a stranger on the train to university. The AHRC disguised these disappointing results by claiming widespread campus “sexual violence” which was actually mainly low-grade harassment like “unwanted staring”. Universities were bullied into establishing a huge industry staffed by Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment (SASH) bureaucrats and counsellors, supporting secretive committees running kangaroo courts adjudicating sexual assault.

Every year activists run more campaigns claiming universities are not doing enough. Just two months ago a group of protesters interrupted a speech by ANU Vice Chancellor Brian Schmidt, claiming the university had done nothing to protect students from the dangers of SASH. “Your Nobel Prize isn’t helping you now!” screamed one protester. Schmidt groveled to the students saying he was prepared to put in unlimited resources to address the problem. “But there’s no easy fix. It’s a wicked problem.”

Let’s face it. It ain’t easy wiping out unwanted staring. But now this righteous man will have to battle new scourges – “loitering” and “invading personal space”.

The new blight of loitering

These are the latest additions to the ever-expanding definition of sexual harassment included in the new survey. To make Brian Schmidt’s wicked problem even more challenging, “inappropriate staring” is now just “staring”. It’s hard to imagine any student who could say they have never been subjected to staring. And even if they have never been stared at themselves, surely everyone could tick the box asking if they had witnessed this happening to anyone else on campus?

Who could deny experiencing someone “making comments or asking intrusive questions about your private life, body or physical appearance”? As we know, one person’s compliment is another’s intrusive question in an era where even using the wrong pronoun could be seen as an inappropriate comment on a private life. Tricky stuff, indeed.

It gets worse. The section on harassment of students now includes, “Making requests for sex or repeated invitations to go out on a date.” So, apparently you are only allowed to ask once for a date – twice is harassment.

But isn’t “making requests for sex” exactly what the feminists demand in their new enthusiastic consent laws? The new survey labels that as harassment yet all sexual acts including kissing are now deemed sexual assault if your partner “made no effort to check whether you agreed or not.”

Powell doesn’t pull her punches

It is all pretty confusing. But none of this should come as a surprise when you consider who is in charge of this survey. Meet self-described “feminist criminologist” Dr Anastasia Powell who has built her career on promoting feminist views on enthusiastic consent and similar issues. Interesting that University Australia happily promotes the fact they are funding advocacy research through the choice of this ideologically driven scholar.

Even though enthusiastic consent is not yet law in most Australian states, Powell and colleagues have slipped this into the survey, which is bound to greatly expand the number of events students regard as sexual assault. Students are told that any sexual experience, including a kiss, which lacks that prior check for consent is now sexual assault. Ditto intoxicated sex of any kind. The survey defines all sexual acts as assault if you were “affected by drugs or alcohol.

Anytime, anywhere, to anyone.

Concerned Student isn’t a sexual assault survivor, so he wasn’t able to send through all the questions that apply for self-defined victims. I’ve been making strenuous efforts to get hold of the whole survey but unsurprisingly, Universities Australia is keeping that firmly under wraps. I sent through a series of questions asking why they were withholding this information. Their response was simply to state the survey and results will be published early 2022: “Universities Australia is committed to transparency, and the public release of the results, along with the survey instrument, is testament to that.”

Please contact me if you happen to have answered the survey or know someone who did. From the questions we do have available it looks like there’s been another big shift. While the previous survey asked questions about events taking place in 2015-16, in the new survey the timing seems to be open-ended – the events could have happened anytime. So, a mature age student could report on any event from 30-40 years ago, but their experiences claimed as evidence of our current campus rape crisis. Neat, isn’t it?

Similarly, the new survey appears to not be confined to campus events but includes sexual acts happening anywhere to the student, and not just involving other students as perpetrators. The survey explicitly and repeatedly invites responses about non-campus incidents. “We’re interested in all of your experienceswhether they happened in ways connected to your university, or at other times and places in your life.”

The survey also asks students to report on not only their own experiences but also if another student from their university “told you, or you suspected, that they may have been sexually assaulted in a university context.” So, the data will include not just hearsay evidence – say, something you read in a student newsletter – but students’ own fanciful assumptions about what might have happened to another person.

Similarly, they are asked if they had witnessed another person being sexually harassed. The survey itself points out that sexual harassment is about conduct which the recipient regards as unwelcome, or leaves them offended, humiliated or intimated. Yet they assume that it’s ok for one person to make that decision for another. Wow, this is taking manipulation of data to a whole new level.

Target audience well prepared

This new survey hits campuses after four years of solid propaganda telling students they are facing a rape crisis, compulsory sexual consent courses for staff and students, endless misinformation in the media promoting the idea that young women are at risk. Students today are far more likely to see themselves as victims than they were when the first survey came out. Back then, the self-selected students who answered the survey were an unrepresentative 10 per cent of the total sample. Now End Rape on Campus activists will be hoping for a far better turn out as reward for their constant advocacy.

Universities Australia is rightly stating the results from the two surveys can’t be compared, given that so much about the survey has changed. But what’s the bet that next year our biased media will use this manipulated data to scream blue murder about increased sexual violence and the mighty SASH industry will have their hands out seeking more money to tackle the growing crisis?

In 2017, I was the only journalist in Australia to report we should be celebrating the good news from the AHRC survey – that there was no rape crisis on our campuses. At that time, I was very fortunate to have the assistance of Chris Lloyd, professor of business statistics at Melbourne University, to ensure I analyzed the results of the survey accurately. I asked Chris to compared key questions in the current survey to the previous one.

“Universities Australia claim to be serious about measuring levels of sexual harassment and sexual assault on campus. Ambiguously worded surveys with very low response rates are no way to achieve this,” said Chris, adding, “I cannot see anything scientifically useful emerging from what I have seen of this new survey.”

The young men in the firing line

As Concerned Student points out, we need to consider the impact of this survey on the way young men and women relate to each other – messages bound to be reinforced in the endless campus propaganda promoting the rape crisis.

“It is encouraging young women to perceive any uncomfortable or awkward sexual experience as a violent sexual violation, and it is casting benevolently intentioned young men as sexual predators. How many men will undeservingly have their lives and reputations shattered because of this rhetoric?’’

That’s so right. Listen to fiery young American journalist, Ashe Schow. I chatted to her on thinkspot last week about her work exposing what’s happening at America’s campus tribunals. Here’s a brief extract where she explains that letting false accusers go free simply teaches young women that it’s totally fine to ruin a young man’s life.

The full video (48:50) is here – please like it, promote it and subscribe to my channel.

I hope you’ll find the time to listen to my long conversation with Ashe exposing the price being paid by male students as a result of this never-ending campaign to encourage women to redefine disappointing sexual misadventures as sexual assault.

For their sakes, we all have to find ways to speak out and expose this malicious, ongoing social engineering.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.