Free Speech Union newsletter

Dear Mike Buchanan,

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter, our round-up of the free speech news of the week. Like all of our work this newsletter depends on the support of our members and donors, so if you’re not already a paying member please sign-up today or encourage a friend to join and help us turn the tide against cancel culture.

Cambridge Vice-Chancellor mired in anti-free speech initiatives resigns early

Stephen Toope has resigned as Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University. Our Director Douglas Murray celebrates the early resignation of the “undistinguished” Vice-Chancellor, listing the many ways freedom of speech and academic freedom were “trashed” during Toope’s tenure. We threatened legal action over an anonymous “microaggression” reporting system backed by him, which was withdrawn following our intervention back in May. The Times says Toope will be remembered for various controversies over free speech at Cambridge, including the landslide defeat of his plan to mandate that all “identities” and views be “respected”. Dr Arif Ahmed, a Fellow of Gonville and Caius College and member of our Advisory Council, played a critical role in winning that battle. He has written for Spiked about the victorious campaign to defeat the plan.

Professor Paul Harper-Scott has resigned from Royal Holloway in protest against “endemic” cancel culture and the dogmatic purification of the curriculum via “decolonisation” initiatives. The Telegraph and the Times have reported on the story, and Professor Harper-Scott has written a blog post explaining why he left.

Worcester College has apologised for hosting a Christian Concern event after “distressed” students complained, despite the event taking place outside of term time. Writing in the Telegraph, Catherine Pepinster says the episode shows that freedom of speech is “in danger of being lost” at Worcester. We are writing to David Isaac, the Provost of Worcester and former Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, to complain.

Meanwhile, academics at the University of Exeter have been advised by the University’s library to de-emphasise “white, male and Eurocentric authors” and instead rely more on tweets and blogs for research to ensure that “marginalised, misrepresented or excluded” voices are heard. The guidance has prompted a backlash, with 40 academics expressing anger at this latest “decolonisation” drive, but a planned letter of protest is being delayed until after the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill becomes law.

The Government has been accused of double standards after confirming that Oxbridge common rooms will be exempt from the provisions of the Higher Education Bill. Universities Minister Michelle Donelan argued that junior and middle common rooms did not need to be included in the law as colleges fund JCRs and MCRs and can therefore “exert a lot of control over their activities” – and Oxbridge colleges will be subject to the new law.

The 2021 US College Free Speech Rankings have been released by the Foundation for Individuals Rights in Education. The pro-free speech group reports that 66% of students support shouting down speakers and 23% support using violence to stop a speaker.

School holds mock trial of Conservative MP, finding him guilty because of his ancestors’ links to the slave trade

A south Dorset school held a mock trial of Conservative MP Richard Drax, with children as young as 12 deciding whether he should be held responsible for his ancestors’ involvement in the slave trade.

Scottish schools have been urged to carry out an “audit of books”, with children’s classic The Tiger That Came To Tea again in the firing line at a three-day conference. A campaign group called Zero Tolerance previously said the book reinforced gender stereotypes because the greedy tiger is male and is waited on by the female characters. Teachers attending the conference were also urged not to use “gendered names” such as “buddy” for children.

Candidates to be blocked from seeking office if they’ve sent “grossly offensive” tweets

Andrew Tettenborn of our Legal Advisory Council has sounded the alarm about provisions in the Election Bill which would prevent people from standing for election if they’ve been convicted under the Communications Act 2003 of sending a “grossly offensive” message. “An over-enthusiastic hustings heckler – or an excessively outspoken rival candidate – could face becoming legally unelectable to any office for five years,” he writes. “The same would apply to anyone who, like a campaigner imprisoned a couple of years ago, followed an MP or councillor around to make a point he or she didn’t want to hear. And, of course, it could apply to anyone who tweets unpleasant things about a political rival.”

Meanwhile, police told a pro-life activist that giving offence is the equivalent of punching someone in the face, reports Dave Brennan in the Critic.

Too dangerous for Labour MP to attend her party conference after she criticised trans ideology

The Speaker of the House of Commons has intervened over the threats made to Labour MP Rosie Duffield after she was labelled “transphobic” for liking a tweet saying “only women have a cervix”. Sir Lindsay Hoyle said that MPs should be able to appear publicly “without fear of harm” after Duffield said she would not be able to attend the Labour Party conference because of the threats. She has sought a meeting with Sir Keir Starmer, but so far the Labour leader hasn’t responded. Brendan O’Neill criticised Starmer’s “shameful silence” over the abuse targeting Duffield and Trevor Phillips has written about the case in the Times.

Sir Ed Davey was questioned by Andrew Marr over the case of FSU member Natalie Bird, barred for standing as a candidate for the Liberal Democrats because she wore a t-shirt saying “woman: adult human female”. Natalie is now crowdfunding to fight a legal battle against the Party. Jo Bartosch says that Lib Dems are being purged of feminists as the Party embraces trans ideology with increasing zeal. Debbie Hayton reports on how the Lib Dems silenced a debate on conversion therapy after a speaker tried to warn about the unintended consequences of an overly-broad ban that might prohibit reasonable therapeutic techniques.

Joanna Williams says the Crown Estate is engaging in “woke washing” by signing up to Stonewall’s embattled Diversity Champions programme – a scheme many other organisations are ditching. She explores how Stonewall became synonymous with the Establishment.

A feminist discussion and debating society at Bristol University has been sanctioned for being a women-only space. It is raising funds to challenge the decision.

Ellen Pasternack says the success of recent books by gender critical feminists shows that “no debate” is no longer an option where trans issues are concerned.

Scottish children should be taught to use “inclusive pronouns” under a new guide book aimed at 9-11 year-olds. What Does LGBT+ Mean? advises primary age children to use “they” instead of “he” or “she” to avoid misgendering their 10-year-old classmates.

Music, arts and culture

Gillian Philip lost her job as a young adult author after she expressed support for JK Rowling on Twitter. She’s a member of the Free Speech Union and we’ve been supporting her ever since. This week, she wrote an article for the Express about her experience of retraining as a HGV driver and how tolerant the haulage industry is compared to the publishing world. She will be speaking about her experience on our panel at the Battle of Ideas: How To Fight Cancel Culture And Win.

Zoe Strimpel of our Advisory Council says the sacking of 14 white members of the English Touring Opera shows how the “quagmire of identity politics” will destroy the arts. Rod Liddle calls it a war “against intelligence, complexity and the acquisition of knowledge”.

Craig Revel-Horwood has spoken of his fear of being cancelled. He said he felt he had to tone down his criticism of couples on Strictly Come Dancing and told the Sun: “There is not as much freedom of speech as we used to have, with the fear of offending certain groups.”

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Thomas Spence says Banned Books Week is not actually interested in banned books, especially if they are written by conservative authors.

“Snowflake” deemed an offensive term by Ofcom

Ofcom has added a raft of new terms to a list of “potentially offensive” words. The terms are not banned, but the words will be taken into account by the regulator when considering a complaint against a broadcaster. They include “snowflake”, “Remoaner”, “gammon”, and “Karen”.

Andrew Doyle of our Advisory Council hosted Free Speech Nation on GB News with a live studio audience this week. You can watch his opening monologue here. Andrew Neil has said he will not appear on the new channel following a war of words between the presenter and the station’s management.

Will woke rule?

Tim Stanley says in his Telegraph column that the age of woke is coming to an end, as the Government fights back to restore free speech on campus. But Sherelle Jacobs argues that Boris Johnson “baulked at putting a culture war at the centre of his governing mission” and that as a consequence the government has been “half-hearted” in responding to things like statue-toppling. Tyler Cowen writes in Bloomberg that the woke movement is America’s next great global export, but Ed West disagrees, arguing in UnHerd that wokery is unlikely to thrive outside the post-Christian West.

NHS and government departments offer critical race training

The NHS is offering courses to staff on Black Lives Matter, white privilege, unconscious bias, authentic allyship and intersectionality, reports Ewan Somerville in the Telegraph.

Civil servants at the Ministry of Justice have been told by a colleague to brush up on their Critical Race Theory, and directed towards an article that criticises Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch for being the wrong sort of black person, reports Guido Fawkes.

Tech

The Online Safety Bill – which poses serious threats to free expression – has likely been delayed by the recent reshuffle.

The Guardian shared the findings of a study by Freedom House which concluded that online freedom is declining globally.

FSU at Battle of Ideas Festival

The FSU will be out in force at this year’s Battle of Ideas Festival at Church House in Westminster on the weekend of the 9th and 10th of October. We’re hosting a session, chaired by our founder Toby Young, called “The FSU Files: How to Fight ‘Cancel Culture’ and Win” in which we’ll hear from individuals who’ve experienced first-hand what it’s like to be cancelled. But these particular individuals also have something else in common: with our help, they’ve all fought back. We will hear from them about what the most effective ways are of surviving an online assassination attempt, as well as more general advice on how to persuade people that free speech is a cause worth defending.

Across the weekend there are numerous other sessions on free speech issues that should be of interest to FSU supporters, including “Hate, Heresy and the Fight for Free Speech”, “From GB News to Ben & Jerry’s: Boycotts or Censorship?”, “Publish and Be Damned?”, “The History Wars”, “The Social Justice March through the Institutions”, “Has Coronavirus Changed Us?” and “Can Culture Survive the Culture Wars?”

Most of our staff will be there encouraging others to join the FSU, so come and find us at our stall and say hello. You can buy tickets here. Members were sent a discount code in the last monthly newsletter.

Incidentally, Toby will be debating the pros and cons of the lockdown policy alongside Carl Heneghan, Luke Johnson and Oliver Kamm at the London Hotel on Monday. You can purchase tickets to that event here.

Graham Linehan on cancel culture

Our Education and Events Director Jan Macvarish interviewed Graham Linehan in our latest members-only speakeasy. The award-winning comedy writer had a lot to say about some of the sitcoms he’s created, including Father Ted, Black Books and The IT Crowd, as well as fighting off attempts to cancel him from trans activists. You can watch the interview on our YouTube channel here. Please do subscribe to the channel as when we hit 30,000 subscribers we can start monetising it.

Sharing the Newsletter

You can share our newsletters on social media with the buttons below to help us spread the word. If someone has shared this newsletter with you and you’d like to join the FSU, you can find our website here.

Best wishes,

Benjamin Jones

Case Officer


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Pro-life charity to join us outside the Conservative party conference, 3/4 October

We’re looking forward to campaigning on the issue of domestic violence outside the Conservative party conference in Manchester, over Sunday, 3 / Monday, 4 October. We’ll be holding a new banner and handing out thousands of new leaflets relating the truth about DV, and resting placards on DV (and possibly abortion) on walls nearby.

Christian Hacking is the parliamentary liaison officer for the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, a charity set up to educate the British public on the humanity and value of unborn children and the reality of abortion. He’ll be giving a presentation at ICMI21, “What the heck can men be doing about abortion?” I’m pleased to report that Christian and supporters of his organization, mainly women, will be campaigning alongside us. Abortion is a men’s issues as well as a women’s issue. Over 10 million unborn children have been killed in the UK since the passing of the Abortion Act in 1967, and over 200,000 more are added every year. To call it genocide is to understate the reality.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Martin Seager on BBC Radio 4 discussing toxic masculinity, positive masculinity, and accepting boys as boys.

Our thanks to Andrew for this:

Mike

The British Psychological Society’s Martin Seager was on BBC Radio 4 yesterday (Wednesday, 22 September). Of interest to your supporters? And the BPS’s Male Psychology Section is worthy of promotion.

15:04 -19: 54  Consultant clinical psychologist Martin Seager from the British Psychological Society (BPS) Male Psychology Section (MPS) here discusses toxic masculinity, positive masculinity, and accepting boys as boys.

Interesting that the mother of two boys is so worried about her ability to bring up her two boys. IMHO having successfully brought up my son all you need is time, patience, objectivity, example, and a willingness to negotiate the system from a positive masculinity point of view.

How should I prepare my son for adolesence [sic]?

Bringing Up Britain

Series 14

‘The relationship between the sexes is high on the agenda thanks to the revelations of school harassment on Everyone’s Invited, children’s increasing exposure to porn and hashtags like #NotAllMen. But how are parents navigating this complex area? In this four part series of Bringing Up Britain, Anjula Mutanda sets out to find answers. She explores whether stereotypes matter, how to prepare boys for adolescence, the pros and cons of single sex education and how to parent children through the complexities of online harassment and abuse.

In this episode, Anjula speaks to Lavinia, a mother of two boys aged 5 and 10 who wants to know how to prepare her older son for the world he’s entering, while protecting him from life’s harsh realities. While there has rightly been a huge focus on girls’ wellbeing in recent years, [J4MB emphasis: BBC pro-female bias, much?] are boys being left behind, or even discriminated against? Anjula brings together a series of experts from psychologists, to teachers and child development experts to explore just what boys on the cusp of adolescence are facing today.’

BBC Radio 4 – Bringing Up Britain, Series 14, How should I prepare my son for adolesence?

BW, Andrew


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

How is this fair to ANYONE? Outrage as BOYS are allowed to compete in – and win – a GIRLS’ state netball competition while raging parents hurl abuse from the stands… as Australia’s warped gender obsession continues

Our thanks to Nigel for this. He writes:

I must admit on just reviewing headlines with a morning coffee I laughed at this story, then I realised it was good for the boys! Constantly we are told that girls should compete with boys in football, cricket, wrestling and so on where there are too few girls to make a competition. Actually applying the same logic to these boys is after all just being consistent. And frankly there is far too much “have your cake and eat it” whereby it’s one set of rules for females and quite another for males. Of course it’s yet another embarrassing puncture hole in the whole “biology doesn’t matter” ideology. Quite clearly by teenage years it already does, very much.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Bettina Arndt: Fifty years of lies about domestic violence – exposing the feminists’ cash cow

Bettina writes:

Exactly fifty years ago, the world’s first refuge for women fleeing domestic violence opened in London. After her small Chiswick terrace quickly filled to overflowing, the next twelve years became a constant scramble for founder Erin Pizzey as she set up dozens of women’s refuges by squatting in abandoned houses, before eventually attracting proper donors and real money.

Her success caught the attention of the fledging Women’s Movement which was struggling financially after their initial housewife fan base grew tired of their provocative antics. They realized that domestic violence was their perfect cash cow, an issue destined to attract generous support from women and the natural chivalry of men. So, they moved in on Erin’s operation and took it over, ultimately erasing her from the history of the women’s refuge movement.

That’s the great irony. Erin Pizzey’s own efforts became the trigger for an almighty, world-wide enterprise, an industry which she now describes as “one of the most fraudulent movements history has ever seen.”

She’s spent the last half century speaking out about the billions of dollars being spent across the world, employing armies of feminist bureaucrats to deny the essential truth that women are rarely innocent victims of dangerous men but more often active participants in family violence. Having grown up in a violent home, with a mother who once whipped her with the cord from an iron, Erin knew about how women contribute to generational violence. She wasn’t surprised to discover that many of the women filling her women’s refuges were as dangerous as the men they had left – lashing out at their own children and other women in the homes.

This brave woman’s determination to speak out about two-way violence led to death threats and constant harassment from the feminists, which eventually forced her to leave the country and spend many years living overseas. She’d planned a trip to Australia in 1976, having been invited by our women’s refuges but the invitation was withdrawn when the feminists discovered she’d spoken about women’s violence in the New Zealand leg of her trip.

Spending her working life being de-platformed, ostracized and abused doesn’t make for an easy life. There’s a fundraiser designed to help the now 82-year-old who is unable to afford a new car after discovering her old one failed to comply with new low emissions laws. I hope many of you will contribute something in appreciation of this heroic woman’s efforts to seek fair treatment for abused men.

Americans exposing domestic violence lies 

Over the ditch the Americans are also taking up the fight in a big way – this week launching a Tell the Truth about Domestic Violence campaign. This international media and advocacy campaign fightback is being driven by CEDV (Coalition to End Domestic Violence) which aims to ensure that domestic violence laws, policies, and practices are based on science, not ideology, and support the needs of all victims.

They’ve put together a heavily referenced documentThirty Years of Domestic Violence Half-Truths, Misrepresentations and Lies – which exposes the role of the US Department of Justice in funding and promoting the ongoing disinformation campaign.

Take the famous 2009 statement by Attorney General Eric Holder claiming that intimate partner violence was the leading cause of death for younger African American women. It was five years before the Justice Department admitted that was wrong. In fact, it comes in 7th or 8th on the list, well down from causes like cancer and heart disease.

CEDV rebuts many of the key DV fibs, like men beating up wives on Superbowl Sunday or the recent promised “second pandemic” of lockdown violence. They have put together useful fact sheets to be shared by sympathetic media in the participant countries like Mexico, Portugal, Canada, as well as the UK and USA.

Turning point in Australia

Meanwhile, in Australia we’re confronting a pivotal moment in our own disinformation campaign.

Next year the funding for the National Plan to reduce Violence against Women and their Children runs out – having wasted an extraordinary $3 billion largely on promoting feminist ideology which has no bearing on true causes of domestic violence. (Look at this extract from a submission by the oneinthree campaign to a recent inquiry, presenting abundant evidence refuting the central claim that DV stems from gender inequality.)

The stage is set for this huge juggernaut to just roll on, with the femocrats trotting out more of the same dangerous, anti-male propaganda.

But now there has emerged a powerful weapon which could just steer things in a different direction, if the silent majority makes itself heard.

In April a bi-partisan parliamentary report was released which included two pathbreaking recommendations, namely:

     “…that the next National Plan be named the “National Plan to Reduce Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence”

“..that the next National Plan be inclusive of the diversity of victim-survivors. In particular, the next plan should recognise the rights and needs of women; children in their own right; men; older Australians; LGBTQI people; and people living with a disability”.

Well, wouldn’t that set the cat amongst the pigeons? Requiring our domestic violence policies to properly address all victims of violence would mean moving away from failed policies falsely claiming that misogyny and gender inequality are principal drivers of domestic violence.

The Social Policy and Legal Affairs Committee that made these recommendations noted that the previous National Plan’s policies had been totally unsuccessful. “The $3b domestic violence effort has failed,” declared the Australian Financial Review after the Committee published their report. As the Committee stated, “It is clear that the national plan has not achieved its objective of a significant and sustained reduction in violence against women and their children.”

Hmm, well, therein lies the problem. The DV bureaucrats are endlessly expanding the definition of domestic violence – most recently by including coercive control – to expand their power base and keep themselves in business but that means they can’t possibly meet their own milestones for success. It’s a conundrum worthy of a Yes Minister episode, with Humphrey Appleby patiently explaining to his Minister that, “It’s not that we don’t want to see fewer victims but …”

This important report appears to be languishing in too-hard baskets in relevant Minister’s offices. Cowering politicians are clearly nervous of arousing the ferocious women’s mob that ripped some of their kind apart earlier this year and hoping that by keeping quiet they might make it peacefully through to the next election.

But if we let that happen, the new National Plan will be set in stone – filled with even more measures which do nothing to actually protect women let alone all the diverse groups of victims, including men. The social engineering proposed by this mob is becoming even more ambitious: new school proposals covering financial literacy for girls as well as expanded gender equity and sexual consent courses; safe and affordable housing for victims of violence and more women in STEM initiatives.

Naturally there will be unlimited funding for the huge propaganda bureaucracies like ANROWS (Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety). Take a look at the catchy title of their latest offering: Crossing the line: Lived experience of sexual violence among trans women from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse backgrounds in Australia. The cost to taxpayers of this drivel was $262k.

Make your voice heard

Most of the community would surely support an inclusive policy that addresses all these victim groups, from men to battered lesbian women to vulnerable elderly or disabled people, and perhaps most important of all, children growing up with violent mothers. This has to be a popular measure – but what we must do is convince politicians that this is what most people want.

That’s where you come in. We have put together a draft letter available on the Mothers of Sons website that you can use to send to politicians, telling them that quiet Australians want our money spent to stop violence against everybody.

We’re recruiting big organisations across the country to get people on board – including all the major men’s groups, plus other organisations keen that we loosen the grip of identity politics on this important social issue.

We hope you’ll all step up for this one – please send not only to your local MP but relevant ministers and sympathetic backbenchers both federal and state. As I always say, we only have ourselves to blame if we allow policy to be driven by noisy, minority groups instead of telling politicians that this mob doesn’t speak for us.

Pinocchio moments

Finally, just for fun we are also launching our Pinocchio moment meme collection. You will have seen our first three at the top of this page. These will be posted on the Mothers of Sons Facebook page for you to circulate. Our brilliant graphic artist, Fraser Hopwood, is lined up to add Pinocchio noses to a bunch of other prominent people known to distort the truth about domestic violence – including the motley crew shown above.

These are just the start of series of memes exposing the lies prominent people are promoting about this issue. We are recruiting all the major men’s groups to help us get these out in the community. Please help promote them on social media.

But we also need you to help us find short snappy quotes to use for these and other key offenders. Please send them in here. It’s not so easy finding the right quotes along with evidence to challenge these fibs. With your help we are hoping this could really take off, a funny, revealing way of calling out people playing fast and loose with the truth.

Lee Anderson MP on the M25 protestors, “Insulate Britain”

A tip of the hat to Lee for a question he asked in the House of Commons, here.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

YouTube have taken down Steve Brule’s channel, including every episode of The Fiamengo Files

I am saddened to report that YouTube have taken down Steve Brule’s channel, including every episode of the outstanding Fiamengo Files. Many thousands of comments have been lost, but the videos themselves are still available to watch on Odysee, here.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

First report of the APPG on Issues Affecting Men and Boys

Our thanks to David Eggins for this. On the final page of the 41-page report:

This policy report has been authored by:

– Mark Brooks OBE, Policy Advisor to the APPG on Issues Affecting Men and Boys: http://www.mark-brooks.co.uk
– Mike Bell and Christopher Badley, Equi-Law (who also act as the
secretariat): http://www.equi-law.uk

To contact the APPG, please email: Mike Bell via mike@equi-law.uk


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Esther Vilar’s “The Manipulated Man” (1971)

To my mind, one of the most insightful books ever written about relations between the sexes is The Manipulated Man (1971), by Esther Vilar (1935-), a German-Argentine writer. It’s searingly honest and laugh-out-loud funny in parts, my copy of the 2008 edition is a treasured possession.

I was intrigued to discover that – in this year, 50 years after the book’s first publication – even used copies are not available to order from Amazon UK, Waterstone’s, WH Smith or other major UK booksellers. It does not appear available to buy (at least the English-language edition) on Amazon’s other sites. I shall be asking the book’s publisher, Pinter & Martin, for an explanation (they’re not selling the book either).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Baroness Hale: My feminism may have cost me Supreme Court president role

A piece in today’s Sunday Telegraph. You can subscribe to the paper here.

The former judge said her uncompromising stance on women’s rights may have put her at a disadvantage during her first try for the position

Baroness Hale of Richmond claims she may have missed out on becoming Supreme Court president on her first attempt because she is a “feminist”.

The trailblazing former judge said her uncompromising stance on women’s rights may have put her at a disadvantage against her opponent, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, who beat her to the position in 2012.

She was one of the two longest serving Law Lords when she applied and was finally elected on her second attempt in 2017, becoming the first woman to head the UK’s highest court. She served until her retirement in 2020.

Her comments come after claims that she had a row with a fellow justice in the run up to the contest and consequently was seen as overly sensitive by colleagues.

‘Touchy’ and not ‘suitable’

Baroness Hale was said to have “taken offence” to a comment by Nicholas Wilson, a former Supreme Court justice, which led to another colleague describing her as “touchy” and perhaps not a “suitable” president.

In an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Desert Island Discs, she was asked if people were right to cite her feminism as a potential reason she lost out on the job on her first attempt.

Baroness Hale replied: “They may have been. Or just the fact that I was a woman. Or that I was me! I am sure there will be things about me that not everybody likes. Possibly my propensity for speaking my mind when I want to. Sometimes my tactlessness.”

She said her colleagues may have found her difficult to handle at times.

“I have made no secret of my belief that women are the equals of men in dignity and in rights, and that their experience of life is just as valid and important in shaping the law, as is the experience of men,” she said.

“I do not think that was always popular amongst certain sections of the media, and possibly not always popular amongst some of my colleagues.

Having an agenda

“One of my colleagues I subsequently learned, because he published diaries, said that I was seen as having an agenda. Well, I probably do have an agenda, which is to promote equality and diversity.

“It’s an agenda which lots of people have but it is sometimes stigmatised as being an agenda, whereas the agenda which other people have, to preserve the status quo, is never seen as an agenda.”

During Baroness Hale’s distinguished career, she was the first woman appointed to the Law Commission in 1984, the first female Law Lord in 2004, and the first female justice of the Supreme Court in 2009.

She was thrust into the spotlight in 2019 when she read out the Supreme Court’s decision that Prime Minister Boris Johnson acted unlawfully when he advised the Queen to suspend Parliament.

“It doesn’t give us any satisfaction at all to tell the Prime Minister or a public authority that what they have done is unlawful, but it is satisfying to reach a judgement,” she said.

“We were not debating whether or not Brexit should happen. That had been decided in the referendum, and we are a democracy.”

Discussing the spider brooch she wore to deliver the judgement, which prompted much speculation that it contained a hidden message about her feelings towards Mr Johnson, she said it was no more than a last-minute wardrobe choice.

“When I got the dress out of the wardrobe the spider which usually sits on it was nowhere to be seen,” she said.

“So I went quickly to my jewellery drawer and took out another spider. It never crossed my mind that anybody would draw any conclusions from the fact that I was wearing a spider rather than a dragonfly or a frog or anything else. There were no hidden messages in it whatsoever.”


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.