William Collins: A Level Awards 2021 and Their Obfuscation

Just published.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Paul Elam: “Overcoming Women’s Relational Aggression”

Excellent (audio, 20:11).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Bettina Arndt newsletter

Hi Everybody,

There’s some cheerful news in my newsletter this week, revealing two wonderful examples of dreadful chicanery being used to prop up the feminist narrative of virtuous women and villainous men. You will be amazed how hard the ideologues work to deny that essential truth about human nature – that neither gender has a monopoly on vice nor virtue.

But first, I must mention that next time you will hear from me will be via the writers’ website, substack.com where from now on I will be posting all my blogs – see here. This won’t cost you anything although eventually I may provide extra features for subscribers. But the big advantage is all my written work will be easy to find, available for you to pass on to others and you’ll be able to post comments – hopefully leading to some lively conversations. Naturally, you can opt out if you choose.

We’re also setting up a new channel on rumble where I will publish all my videos, starting with New Zealander Peter Joyce’s frightening story of being accused of rape by a woman he never met. We’ll have that up on the site in the next few days and also on my YouTube channel.

But on with my interesting revelations…

Family Court judges in trouble for exposing the truth

Last month an Australian social issues journal published the most fascinating research Allegations of child sexual abusewhich showed judges determined that only 12% of the child sexual abuse allegations involved in contested family court cases were found to be true.

Accusations of abuse that were deliberately misleading were found to be twice as common as true allegations, according to the study by Webb, Moloney, Smyth and Murphy, which reviewed family court cases from 2012 to 2019.

Take a look at this graph summarizing the findings.


You might wonder how many of the 102 cases of deliberately misleading accusations were prosecuted for perjury? Anyone who followed submissions to the recent Family Law inquiry will know the answer to that one – precisely zero.

Though startling, these results shouldn’t come as a surprise. Over thirty years ago I published an article quoting a retiring family court judge speaking out about the proliferation of false accusations of child sexual abuse in contested cases. Other judges have raised concerns about the problem and it has long been known that false accusations are more common in custody disputes.

That’s the real world, very different from the alternate reality occupied by these researchers who make it clear they hoped to prove false accusations were rare. Nola Webb, barrister and lead author of the study, proudly told the ABC that she commenced the research because she was shocked to hear from mothers reporting their child abuse accusations were being dismissed in family court.

Faced with devastating evidence that judges conclude most of the allegations didn’t stack up, the researchers do their best to massage the results to disguise the extent of the false allegation problem. For instance, they exclude allegations which are “one of a multitude of criticisms of the other parent” claiming this might “minimise their seriousness and compromise their believability.” What, a mother fires off a barrage of complaints including child sexual abuse allegations and that somehow makes these allegations less serious? Go figure….

Also excluded from the deliberately false accusation category are cases they deem as “genuine but mistaken belief” which is clearly a phony category designed to minimize the rate of false accusations. (For data wonks, my brilliant researcher has put together a brief explanation of some of the complexities of this study’s statistics here.)

The bottom line is here we have an important study revealing the true extent of the problem of false allegations of child sexual abuse in family court cases – allegations which often result in small children being subjected to multiple intrusive interviews by court experts and the shaming of innocent fathers.

But this significant news is totally ignored by our mainstream media, apart from that skewed ABC article claiming the judges have it all wrong. Oh yes, there was also a bizarre blog in Diplomat magazine claiming the study proved “the family court offers a prime example of how male supremacist groups are able to alter the culture of public institutions to the detriment of our collective social health.”

Coercive control comes back to bite them

Meanwhile, in the UK feminists are engaged in another battle to misrepresent the truth of what happens to children in family court battles. But here the sisterhood finds itself hoisted on their own petard, with their latest coercive control weaponry threatening to misfire badly, opening the door to action against women rather than just men.

Coercive control was introduced into British law a few years ago when the DV industry demanded that a whole range of new behaviour involving emotional/psychological manipulation should be defined as violence. In theory the legislation was gender neutral, but it is pretty much only men who are being charged with coercive control.

Now there’s a new Domestic Abuse Act 2021 which takes a major step forward in recognizing children as victims in their own right, underlining how critical it is to protect them from coercive control. Logically, that meant recognizing parental alienation (PA) as a form of coercive control which impacts on children and this was indeed included in the new Act until feminists launched an almighty barrage of complaint, roping in the London Victims Commissioner, to bully parliamentarians to get PA removed from the actual bill.

Sure enough, they pulled that off, but PA is still mentioned in the draft statutory guidelines and feminists are now conducting a ferocious media campaign arguing that the notion of alienating children is a cynical ploy by abusive fathers to wrest control from ‘protective mothers.’

Take a look at this charming piece in The Guardian from Charlotte Proudman, a human rights barrister “specializing in violence against women and girls”. The title says it all, “The discredited legal tactic that’s putting abused UK children in danger.”

Here’s Proudman’s summing up:

“The dangerous label of parental alienation is now the single biggest threat to the credibility of victims of domestic abuse, and to the voices of children. It gives validation, power and control to perpetrators. Any court that countenances unevidenced allegations of parental alienation is potentially sanctioning abuse.”

Not exactly pulling her punches, is she? Her conclusion comes after a string of lies and misinformation, claiming PA is extremely rare, discredited by mental health authorities, and inadmissible in American courts.

Proudman’s shocking misrepresentation of the facts regarding PA is dissected in recent blogs by Robert Franklin, an American writer who has been writing for many years about divorce and custody issues. See his commentary on his site – The Word of Damocles.

Feminist panic at damaging own goal

It’s been highly entertaining watching the panic set in as the feminist policy makers and bureaucrats realize the power of parental alienation to undermine their own male-bashing agenda.

It’s happening here in Australia as well. With coercive control now set to become part of our domestic violence law, key players are out in force doing everything they can to discredit parental alienation before it ends up causing similar problems to those besetting their UK sisterhood.

Listen to this incredible recording of the Children’s Commissioner, Megan Mitchell, dismissing the whole notion of parental alienation at a hearing of the family law inquiry. “I think that’s a pretty kooky theory. I think it’s proven as pretty much debunked,” says Mitchell, who describes herself as “a psychologist by trade.”
“There’s no evidence to suggest it is a real thing,” she claims, adding an extraordinary claim that the “fellow who concocted the theory” believed that “the way to cure incest was to give the mother a vibrator.”

How’s that for mudslinging? Mitchell is actually talking about Dr Richard Gardner, the eminent American child psychiatrist who came up with the term “parental alienation” for behaviour extremely well supported in hundreds of research papers. Her malicious, ignorant misrepresentation of Gardner’s views is rightly called out in this analysis by Amanda Sillars, who runs the excellent Eeny Meeny Miney Mo Foundation which showcases the many decades of research on parental alienation.

Amanda is a PA victim herself and her highly professional organization makes it clear that both men and women engage in behaviours that damage the relationship between their child and the child’s other parent. But it’s most likely to happen with divorced or separated parents and because women are most often the live-in parents, they are the ones best positioned to exert this control.

Everyone knows that – including the feminists. Recognising parental alienation as coercive control of children threatens to expose women’s capacity for violence in a very public way. That would be a mighty blow to the hateful, divisive anti-male ideology so influential in our society.

That’s why the ideologues will stop at nothing to shut this down, just as they work so hard to suppress news of the appallingly high frequency of false child sexual abuse accusations used to gain advantage in family law battles. It is very revealing that in both cases their single-minded focus on women’s rights means they cheerfully throw the needs of vulnerable children under the bus.

Until next time, Tina


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Free Speech Union: Weekly News Round-Up

Dear Mike Buchanan,

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter. This newsletter is a brief round-up of the free speech news of the week.

Police unveil fleet of rainbow-coloured patrol vehicles to combat “hate crime”

Police forces across Britain have begun to replace their patrol cars with “hate crime cars”, which are decorated with rainbow colours and emblazoned with the word “Pride”. The police say they hope the new rainbow cars will encourage more people to report “hate crimes”, such as failing to address a bearded, 6ft 4in biological male who identifies as a woman as “Miss”. In an article for the Mail I explained why, in spite of their clownish appearance, there is something quite sinister about these new unicorn cars:

Only a tiny fraction of reported “hate crimes” end up being prosecuted, but that isn’t because the police cannot catch the perpetrators – tracing social media accounts is easy. It’s because the vast majority of these aren’t crimes at all, but what the police describe as “non-crime hate incidents”.

You might think I’m making that up – it sounds like something out of George Orwell’s 1984 – but I’m not. According to Freedom of Information requests, 120,000 “non-crime hate incidents” were formally recorded by 34 police forces in England and Wales between 2014 and 2019.

Feminist Sacked by Sadiq Khan Fights Back

Joan Smith, the Co-Chair of the Mayor’s Violence Against Women Board who was fired by Sadiq Khan last week after she expressed concern about transwomen being granted access to women’s refuges, has hit back with articles in UnHerd and the Critic. In the latter, she writes:

The speed with which the category of “woman” is being dismantled is astonishing to behold. Earlier this year, peers had to organise a revolt against the government’s Maternity Bill in order to have the word “person” replaced with “mother” or “expectant mother”.

Meanwhile, the police were called to a pub in Edinburgh after a group of feminists refused to leave when told their booking had expired by a transgender member of staff. The bar person objected to stickers a member of the group had left in the ladies lavatory campaigning against the reform of the Gender Recognition Act which will make it easier for people to legally change their gender. The member of staff told the women to leave the pub and take their “hateful” stickers with them – and when they refused, the police were called. Greene King, the owner of the pub, has launched an internal investigation into the incident.

Britain’s greatest post-war poet threatened with cancellation

Writing in the Telegraph, Simon Heffer has expressed concern that next year’s centenary of Philip Larkin’s birth will see the poet being cancelled for his use of the n-word in his private correspondence:

Hull, where he worked as university librarian, is fretting about housing his statue; and Coventry, his birthplace, is being “UK City of Culture 2021” while barely noticing him.

Heffer urges people to distinguish between the poet’s private views and his public works: “Whatever his private opinions, he was the greatest poet in English since Eliot. And that is where we should begin our evaluation of him on his centenary.”

In other literary news, a charity aiming to end violence against women has criticised the much-loved children’s book The Tiger Who Came For Tea. Rachel Adamson of Zero Tolerance told BBC Radio Scotland that the book included “old fashioned” “gender stereotypes” that could lead to women being raped. “We know that gender stereotypes are harmful and they reinforce gender inequality, and that gender inequality is the cause of violence against women and girls, such as domestic abuse, rape and sexual harassment,” she said.

TV shows about cancel culture

Netflix has launched a new TV series about cancel culture at a fictional American university. In The Chair, Sandra Oh plays the new Chair of the English Department at Pembroke University having to deal with a crisis involving a liberal professor who is wrongly accused of being a fascist after a video clip of him doing a mock Nazi salute circulates on social media. Writing in the Times, Gerard DeGroot, emeritus professor of history at the University of St Andrews, says the series rings horribly true. “The real problem lies with a tiny minority of students whose minds have been slammed shut by their rarefied standards of acceptable thought,” he says.

Meanwhile, Channel 4 is planning its own series on cancel culture, this one presented by John Cleese. Called Cancel Me, it will explore why a new “woke” generation is rewriting the rules about what can and can’t be said. The 81-year-old comedian is no fan of censorship, having objected last year to the BBC’s decision to remove an episode of Fawlty Towers from iPlayer because one of the characters (the Major) used racist language. “We were not supporting his views, we were making fun of them,” Cleese said.

Stonewall’s woes

Following the FSU’s report on Stonewall, the LGBTQ+ campaigning organisation continues to experience difficulties. Earlier this week, the actor Simon Callow accused Stonewall of taking a “tyrannical” turn and indulging in “extraordinarily unproductive militancy”. “This is just tyranny and that’s what we’ve fought against all our lives, people saying, ‘this cannot be discussed’,” he told the Times. “Yes, it can be discussed. Everything can be discussed.”

The latest organisation to withdraw from Stonewall’s Diversity Champions programme is Ofcom, the broadcast regulator. On Wednesday, it announced it would be following the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Cabinet Office out of the scheme. “As the communications regulator, an important part of our responsibility [is] to ensure we remain impartial and independent at all times,” an Ofcom spokesperson told the Guardian. “Stepping back from the diversity champions programme, in light of this, is the right thing to do.”

Classics too white

The Cambridge University Classics Faculty will be placing signs underneath plaster casts of Roman and Greek figures in the local archaeology museum explaining that the whiteness of the plaster is not supposed to signify that the ancient world was populated entirely by white people. This move is part of an “Action Plan” unveiled by the Classics Faculty in response to a letter sent to the Faculty last year complaining about the subject’s “whiteness”. Other components of the same plan include making sure all members of staff receive “implicit bias training” and that students feel comfortable about reporting “microaggressions”.

“You might just about understand this coming from a student, but the idea that this has been approved by the Faculty is as terrifying as it is comical,” a Cambridge academic told the Telegraph.

The Free Speech Union has written to the Chair of the Classics Faculty pointing out that some aspects of its Action Plan – such as its insistence that all students graduating from Cambridge with a degree in Classics leave with “an appreciation of… the role of Classics in support of racist and imperialist structure and discourse” – are incompatible with the University’s legal duty to uphold freedom of thought and expression.

Meanwhile, Education Scotland, the Scottish Government’s education department, has urged teachers north of the border to “decolonise” the Scottish curriculum and invited them to take a “white privilege test”. In addition, Scottish teachers are urged to consider the role of “white fragility”, which it says “upholds white privilege”.

Similar initiatives are underway in Brighton, where the Council is urging schools to tackle racism using concepts rooted in critical race theory. According to council documents, teachers will be advised that the colour-blind society envisioned by Martin Luther King is a naïve impossibility, and children will be taught to categorise themselves and their peers according to skin colour. White children will be taught that they have unearned “privilege” that “oppresses” their black friends, while black students will learn that British society is systematically rigged against them.

Don’t Divide Us, a pro-free speech organisation, has started a petition opposing this reverse racism which you can sign here. Don’t Divide Us is inviting residents of Brighton who want to be part of a genuine movement for equality of treatment, one that values humanism and free speech, to join their Brighton group and hold the Council to account. Email team@dontdivideus.com to find out more.

Lawyer fined for tweet defending free speech

Barrister Jon Holbrook, who parted company with his chambers earlier this year following a controversial tweet, has been fined £500 by the Bar Standards Board for another tweet, this one responding to a demand from a Muslim to shut down Charlie Hebdo, the satirical French magazine. “Free speech is dying and Islamists and other Muslims are playing a central role,” Holbrook said. “Who will lead the struggle to reinstate free speech as the foundation of all other freedoms?” In justification of its fine, the BSB said that the tweet “would not only cause offence but could promote hostility towards Muslims as a group”.

Writing in the Conservative Woman, Holbrook, who is appealing the decision, says: “Free speech can die in many ways, whether at the hand of terrorists spreading fear, keyboard activists seeking cancellation or administrators imposing unjust fines. None of them must be allowed to succeed.”

Hope Not Hate

Last month, the FSU wrote to all the advertisers who’d been browbeaten into boycotting GB News by Hope Not Hate, a left-wing campaigning organisation. Now, 10 Conservative MPs have written to Kwasi Kwarteng, the Business Secretary, calling for an investigation into the group. They point out that it is registered as a Community Interest Company, a type of firm intended to “benefit the community” and which must not be formed “for political purposes”.

“We are concerned that since 2017 the campaign group Stop Funding Hate has been exploiting the prestige that is afforded by CIC status, and the privileged access that CICs have to many grants of taxpayers’ money, for overtly political means,” says the letter.

I wish I’d thought of that!

Sharing the Newsletter

You can share our newsletters on social media with the buttons below to help us spread the word. If someone has shared this newsletter with you and you’d like to join the FSU, you can find our website here.

Remember, all of our work depends on our members and donors. Sign up today or encourage a friend to join and help us turn the tide against cancel culture and censorship.

Best wishes,

Toby Young
General Secretary


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Extinction Rebellion lays bare the naked reality of climate change

A tip of the hat to Guido Fawkes for this. There’s a link to a very informative video about climate change.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Help Erin back on the road

Please donate what you can. Thanks.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

William Collins’s review of Stephen Baskerville’s “A Gentleman’s Guide”

William Collins and I recently interviewed Stephen Baskerville for ICMI21, a very interesting discussion. Collins has just published this.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Mary Curnock Cook: ‘Systemic bias against boys’? Unexplained differences in Teacher Assessed Grades between boys and girls in this year’s A level results

Our thanks to William Collins for this.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Regarding Men

Followers of this blog will be aware of how highly I rate the Regarding Men initiative, both the weekly video series (Paul Elam, Janice Fiamengo, Tom Golden) and the many 90-minute men-only meetings (one run by myself, Sunday 2pm BST, another – on photography and videography – by Tom Caulfield, our Technical Director, Wednesday 7pm BST). With the permission of Paul Elam, I can confirm the following:

    • Tom Golden is no longer involved with the initiative, his weekly Zoom meetings have come to an end
    • The video series has come to an end
    • Paul Elam is returning to posting audio monologues, the first of them PUA – Thy Frame is Lame (22:15)
    • The Regarding Men website and men-only Zoom meetings will continue as before

Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Dr Eugen Maus RIP

Our thanks to Douglas for this:

Hi Mike,

This is an obituary from the MANNdat site for your nearest equivalent in Germany. I have taken a Google translation and then adjusted it for relevance, grammar and more colloquial English.

Eugen Maus is dead
The former long-time CEO of German men’s campaign association MANNdat, Dr. Eugen Maus, unfortunately passed away on January 31, 2021 after a long illness. At the request of his partner and family, the news was not published until recently.

Dr. Eugen Maus was a psychologist, author and entrepreneur. His very special humour, his open nature and his tendency to get things straight to the point, stood out in particular. These qualities were paired with a wisdom in life that had come from extensive experience and allowed him to maintain an ironic distance from many things.

In 2004, he initiated and was a founding member of MANNdat. Eugen has made a significant contribution to making the concerns of boys, fathers and men better known in the public. He did not shy away from getting involved in controversy. In addition, he often sought personal conversations with politicians. In this regard, and also in his straightforward attitude to the matter, he was always a role model and will remain so.

MANNdat was founded because, when gender mainstreaming was introduced in Germany, politicians promised to include the concerns and concerns of boys, fathers and men in gender policy. Of these hopeful political promises that motivated the founding members of MANNdat to found the association, only disappointing lies have remained. .

Eugen Maus is no longer with us, but he is everywhere we are.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.