A woman takes personal credit for her team’s performance, ep. #439: Anna Hopkin, British gold medal winner

If you’d like to see what male v female competition in sports REALLY looks like, catch this (video, 12:58). It’s the mixed 4x400m relay final from the World Athletics Championships, Doha, 2019, and the last leg (a Polish woman with a strong lead, competing against seven men) starts at 7:57. Enjoy.

In an alternative universe, where we are expected to believe women can compete with men in sports, a piece in The Guardian about Team GB winning gold medals in the swimming 4x100m mixed medley in Tokyo, and British swimmer Anna Hopkin’s claim to have “beaten” the American male swimmer Caeleb Dressel. Extracts:

It was the first time this mixed relay has featured on the Olympic programme, and the novelty made for an array of different approaches as each of the teams tried to figure out the best strategy. The USA, who looked the strongest team, were the only ones who put a man, Caeleb Dressel, on the final freestyle leg. It was asking a lot of him, given that he’d already won the 100m butterfly final in a world record time, as well as a 50m freestyle semi, earlier in the session. “GB,” he said afterwards, “that was insane.”…

The British had an advantage because their swimmers were all relatively fresh. It wasn’t an accident. Guy was due to compete in the 100m butterfly alongside Dressel, but pulled out so he could concentrate on the relay. The decision paid off, because he turned in a split of 50sec dead, which put the team in first place, but it came at the cost of a shot at winning his first individual medal. If he had been able to replicate that kind of time from a standing start in the individual final, he would have won bronze.

“It did hurt pulling out from the butterfly,” Guy said, “but I made the compromise and I got a gold medal and a world record, so I’ll take that.”…

It meant that by the time (Anna) Hopkin hit the water, she had a half-second lead over China. Hopkin, who trains with Peaty under coach Mel Marshall, swam brilliantly, and finished in 52sec flat. “These guys got me such a great lead, I knew I could stay ahead of the girls,” she said. That still left Dressel, the greatest sprint swimmer in the world, who was starting from eighth place, six seconds back. “Obviously I knew he was coming at me,” Hopkin said, “but there’s just so much going on there’s no point looking at anyone else, I just knew I was not going to lose that lead.” And now, she added, “it’s pretty cool to say I beat Caeleb Dressel”.

It surely goes without saying that other than through the lens of female narcissism, Anna Hopkin did NOT “beat Caeleb Dressel”. It also goes without saying that Dressel swam the final leg faster than her, as you can clearly see here (Dressel is between Hopkin and the Australian swimmer). Her other team members – notably the two men, in particular the self-sacrificing James Guy – gave her such a lengthy start over Dressel that it didn’t matter than she swam more slowly than Dressel.

Is there no limit to female narcissism? No. Women take personal credit for the successes of the teams they lead or of which they’re members, whilst distancing themselves from the failures of the  teams they lead or of which they’re members – in sport, as in everything else.

Women want the upsides of everything and the downsides of nothing, and because of gynocentrism they generally get exactly that.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

ICMI2020 video #113 of 126: “Do Women Not Understand Contracts or are They Just Greedy? The Answer is Yes!” (Regarding Men)

Video #113 is a discussion (video, 30:14). It was played during ICMI20 because a few videos didn’t arrive in time to publish during the event, so we substituted other videos in their place.

ICMI20 was very ambitious in scale – 126 speakers and interviewees – and many people haven’t caught all of the videos. To help remedy that, we’re publishing one video per day from early April until mid-August, so people have a reasonable chance of catching all, or most, of the material. Think of the videos as a daily Red Pill.

The videos are being published in the order in which they were originally published on our YouTube conference playlist. Paul Elam’s YouTube channel has 103,000+ subscribers – a few more than our channel – and also features the playlist.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Free Speech Union: Weekly News Round-Up

Dear Mike Buchanan,

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter. This newsletter is a brief round-up of the free speech news of the week.

Preacher Hatun Tash slashed with knife in Speakers’ Corner attack

Christian preacher and former Muslim Hatun Tash was slashed in the face at Speakers’ Corner on Sunday. She has been a persistent critic of Islam, and, as media reports noted, she was wearing a Charlie Hebdo t-shirt at the time of the attack. We wrote to the Metropolitan Police on her behalf in June urging them to take her safety seriously, following previous altercations and threats. She has every right to speak her mind without fearing for her personal safety. Speaking to GB News, Brendan O’Neill said the assault on Hatun shows, again, a “growing culture of intolerance” towards critics of Islam. Writing about the attack in Spiked, Brendan criticised the widespread failure of the press to report on the story with the seriousness it deserves. Ben Sixsmith compared the knife attack to events in Batley. Writing in UnHerd, he said: “There is no other context, in Western societies, in which speech, even irresponsible and offensive speech, raises the serious and immediate risk of being stabbed in the head.” Hatun subsequently spoke to the Times about the repeated physical assaults she has suffered at Speakers’ Corner. Newsweek noted our support for Hatun.

“Pronoun pledge” for Scotland’s civil servants

The Scottish Government is to ask its 8,000 civil servants to add their pronouns to their email signatures as part of a “transgender inclusivity drive”, the Telegraph reports, despite 60% of staff surveyed opposing the move. The option for staff to leave a comment about the proposal was removed part-way through the survey to “minimise any negative responses”, according to emails disclosed under a Freedom of Information request.

FSU Advisory Council member Andrew Doyle said of the initiative: “What this is actually doing is signalling to people ‘I believe in gender identity ideology and so should you’… So often these initiatives that are intended to foster inclusivity end up creating division.”

Former Woman’s Hour presenter Jenni Murray is opposed to the move. She wrote an article in the Daily Mail in which she said:“The use of pronouns is a political statement. It suggests a belief that gender identity overrides sex and, increasingly, we are seeing more and more women expressing their concern that what they believe, that sex matters, is slowly being eroded.”

Labour investigate MP for liking gender critical tweet

Labour MP Rosie Duffield is being investigated by the party for liking a tweet that said trans people were “cosplaying as the opposite sex”. Debbie Hayton, the trans journalist, has written a piece for the Spectator about the hounding of the MP. Josephine Bartosch notes the support of SNP and Conservative MPs for Duffield, but says “Sir Keir Starmer appears to have gone missing”. Mark Epps has written a piece for Counterweight about leaving the Labour Party, in part because of its stance on trans issues.

Alex Massie demolishes the craven silence from the politicians and groups who should be defending JK Rowling in the face of death threats for her view on the trans debate. Charlotte Runcie writes about the latest monstering of Rowling for the Telegraph. Jenny McCartney in UnHerd highlights the case of Matt Thompson, an LSE Gender Studies student, who gave an academic paper addressed to gender-critical women (abused as “TERFs”, or trans-exclusionary radical feminists) that said: “Picture this: I hold a knife to your throat and spit my transness in your ear. Does that turn you on? Are you scared? I sure fucking hope so.”

Why are so few men defending women’s rights in the trans debate, asks Julie Bindel.

We’re supporting our member Natalie Bird, who was barred from seeking office by the Liberal Democrats for 10 years after she wore a t-shirt with the words “Woman: Adult Human Female” on it. The party said she was “transphobic”. She’s now raising money to fight a legal battle against the party. You can contribute to her fundraiser here.

A teacher has been sacked for obstructing the campaign of a transgender child to be elected head girl. The teacher had also reportedly failed to challenge pupils who called the transgender candidate “disgusting”.

Taxpayers’ money funnelled into “decolonising” initiatives

£11 million of taxpayers’ money has gone to a group called Advance HE, which incentivises universities to “decolonise” their curriculum and introduce unconscious bias training. Lord Wharton, chair of the Office for Students, says the campaigns Advance HE runs “could undermine free speech and interfere with academic freedom”.

Meanwhile, a new student group calling itself LSE Class War is calling for the LSE’s Hayek Society to be banned on the grounds that its existence is “harmful to marginalised students”, and for private school students to be barred from the university. FSU founder Toby Young was quoted in the Daily Mail on the story: “The statements of LSE Class War read like the work of a satirist. Do a group of upper-middle class students at one of Britain’s most exclusive universities really want to wage war against posh people? Or is this a prank designed to take the Mickey out of privately-educated student activists? Unfortunately, we know from experience that student demands that should be treated as a joke are taken deadly seriously by those in authority, so the Free Speech Union stands ready to defend the Hayek Society if there’s any move to ban it. Universities should be places where students are exposed to a broad range of different ideas, not a woke echo chamber.”

Schools and councils push woke social theories

Brighton City Council has embraced critical race theory, writes Adrian Hart in Spiked. Employees must attend anti-racism training, and schools have been told to teach “key aspects of racial literacy” in a hyper-racialised approach to education.

Ann Widdecombe called for free speech to be taught in schools in a conversation with our Advisory Council member Andrew Doyle on GB News. We’ve called for free speech to be included in the Department for Education’s list of “British values” which must be taught in schools following the brouhaha in Batley.

Olivia Hartley has written a piece for the Critic in which she explains why the country’s top independent schools are racing to embrace wokeness.

Is the end of cancel culture in sight?

New data has found that the youngest Generation Z cohort in America – those aged 13 to 16 – are quite strongly opposed to cancel culture: 59% of this group have a negative view of it. Zaid Jilani offers a theory as to why: “Millennials came of age at a time when the internet was slowly introduced into every facet of our lives. They still have a bit of separation between the internet and the real world. When someone is piled on or even fired for an embarrassing old tweet or Facebook status, a millennial’s first impulse is often to think that this person simply shouldn’t have shared that thought online… Gen Z, on the other hand, has grown up immersed in the internet and social media. To them, the barrier between what’s personal and what’s public is fluid, and many Americans of this age don’t find it particularly unusual to broadcast everyday life and thoughts to the entire world. A puritanical mindset that seeks to persecute people over the expression of their beliefs is hard to reconcile with a world where so much of what was once private is now public.”

A poll for the Spectator has found that 40% of the public would support the government censoring books with “sexist, homophobic, or racist” comments.

Sarah Ditum compares cancel culture to Harlow’s social isolation experiments involving monkeys in an article for UnHerd.

Culture war corner

Tanya Gold argues in the Telegraph that the culture wars are not yet widespread in Britain. But a woke cultural elite have tremendous power across society and Adrian Wooldridge writes in the Telegraph about the spread of “woke” ideology throughout the global elite. Harry Miller asks why North Yorkshire Police are being coy about their recent “Intersectionality Conference”. It reportedly featured a “critical race theorist” who charges £1500 a session, but the force has refused to reveal the list of speakers. “In this climate of censoriousness, is it so surprising that Right-wingers and even centrists remain loath to put themselves forward for prominent appointments?” asks our director Douglas Murray in an article on Alan Rusbridger’s recent appointment as the editor of Prospect.

Andrew Tettenborn of our Legal Advisory Council writes for Spiked about Ofcom’s latest push to ensure that all television programmes are “inclusive”. A new report by the regulator says programmes must reflect “the diversity of the UK” and “include the accurate portrayal of protected characteristics”. Can opera survive the culture wars, asks Heather Mac Donald, after the Scottish Opera apologised for casting white singers as Mao Zedong and Chou En-lai in Nixon in China. The National Galleries of Scotland are due to review their entire collection for links to slavery and colonialism, according to a report in the Times. Bel Mooney rejects the racialisation of writing and the obsession with an authors’ ethnicity in an article for Conservative Woman.

Law

The Telegraph has criticised Government plans to reform the Official Secrets Act, significantly curbing press freedom. Under the new proposals, journalists who publish state secrets would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

A tribunal has ruled that “referring to a work colleague as a grandparent counts as age discrimination even if they are one”. Melanie Phillips said the judge took “such an expansive view of the word ‘discrimination’ that it evacuated it of meaning”.

Police are investigating after former nurse Kate Shemirani compared NHS staff giving people Covid vaccines to the Nazi doctors tried at Nuremburg.

Trouble forwarding the newsletter?

We’ve had some concerning reports that people have been unable to forward our newsletter. Please contact us if you’re having problems.

Sharing the Newsletter

You can share our newsletters on social media with the buttons below to help us spread the word. If someone has shared this newsletter with you and you’d like to join the FSU, you can find our website here.

Remember, all of our work depends on our members and donors. Sign-up today or encourage a friend to join and help us turn the tide against cancel culture and censorship.

Best wishes,

Benjamin Jones

Case Officer


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

ICMI2020 video #112 of 126: Hans Laven – “Unequal Before The Law”

Video #112 is a presentation (video, 30:32) by Hans Laven, a Kiwi. The video was played during ICMI20 because a few videos didn’t arrive in time to publish during the event, so we substituted other videos in their place.

ICMI20 was very ambitious in scale – 126 speakers and interviewees – and many people haven’t caught all of the videos. To help remedy that, we’re publishing one video per day from early April until mid-August, so people have a reasonable chance of catching all, or most, of the material. Think of the videos as a daily Red Pill.

The videos will be published in the order in which they were originally published on our YouTube conference playlist. Paul Elam’s YouTube channel has 103,000+ subscribers – a few more than our channel – and also features the playlist.

ICMI2020 video #111 of 126: A Conversation with Dr John Barry – Regarding Men #71

Video #111 is an interview (video, 48:44). The video was played during ICMI20 because a few videos didn’t arrive in time to publish during the event, so we substituted other videos in their place.

ICMI20 was very ambitious in scale – 126 speakers and interviewees – and many people haven’t caught all of the videos. To help remedy that, we’re publishing one video per day from early April until mid-August, so people have a reasonable chance of catching all, or most, of the material. Think of the videos as a daily Red Pill.

The videos will be published in the order in which they were originally published on our YouTube conference playlist. Paul Elam’s YouTube channel has 103,000+ subscribers – a few more than our channel – and also features the playlist.

New research highlights impact of coercive control on UK men

Our thanks to Douglas for this:

A new report has been published by UK Research England, University of Central Lancashire and Mankind Initiative.

Male Victims of Coercive Control Experiences and Impact
by Professor Nicola Graham-Kevan, Deborah Powney & Mankind Initiative

From the Summary:

Domestic abuse is treated as a gendered issue, with male perpetrators and female victims. Despite the Office for National Statistics reporting that one in three victims of domestic abuse is male, research has centred on the experiences of women. This means that men’s experiences may be minimised or ignored.

The Serious Crime Act 2015 created a new offence of controlling or coercive behaviour used within intimate or familial relationships. This is when the perpetrator repeatedly or continuously uses a pattern of behaviour that includes isolating a person from their friends and family, monitoring their time and movements, depriving them of their basic needs, and taking control over their everyday life.

This report summarises the UK findings of a major international survey of the experiences of male victims of intimate partner abuse carried out in 2020. We focussed on men’s experiences of coercive control from intimate partners. The 538 UK respondents were mainly from England (80%), but also Scotland (11%), Wales (6%) and Northern Ireland (3%). The majority of participants had left the abusive relationship (83%), with some respondents still in an abusive relationship (17%). Most men were in heterosexual relationships (91%).

Specific types of abuse are reported in the summary:

  • Threats – such as threats to harm (66%), threats to harm self (49%) and threats to disclose damaging information (66%).
  • Intimidation – such as being nasty to friends or family (74%), smashing property (57%), forcing the person to do things they didn’t want to do (84%).
  • Isolation – such as restricting time spent with family and friends (84%), limiting activities or movement (80%), and checking up on movements (76%).
  • Economic abuse – such as controlling money (71%), refusing to share expenses (75%), or making it difficult to work or study (87%).
  • Emotional abuse – such as putting the person down (79%), showing them up in public (77%), or gaslighting (84%).
  • Using children – such as threatening to take the children away (84%), arguing in front of the children (85%) and making the person feel bad about the children (88%).

The 41-page report can be downloaded from Mankind in PDF format.
https://www.mankind.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Male-Victims-of-Coercive-Control-2021.pdf

These experiences of coercive control severely limited male victims’ sense of choice and freedom. The distress of experiencing abuse had a physical impact and psychological affect that would be of clinical concern in eight out of ten men.

There are five recommendations:
[1] Although there is consistent national and international evidence of men’s coercive control victimisation, there remains a need to conduct a large-scale national study investigating the experiences of male victims of coercive control in terms of impact. The findings of which should inform the wording of the Office for National Statistics impact questions for male victims of coercive control.

[2] A whole system approach towards enhancing the understanding of the prevalence and specific experiences male victims is required so that agencies including the police, Crown Prosecutors, judiciary, general practitioners, social services and CAFCASS officers understand how men experience coercion, how they communicate this to others, what factors are more salient to male victims, and what support they need.

[3] A whole system approach towards enhancing the understanding of the impact on children of being exposed to their father’s coercive control victimisation and also being subject coercive control directly by their female caregiver is needed so that agencies including the police, Crown Prosecutors, judiciary, general practitioners, social services and CAFCASS officers, as well as other frontline services can detect and respond appropriately to protect children.

[4] There is need to adapt current national awareness campaigns to adequately reflect male victimisation and to educate the public and change societal attitudes towards who may be a victim of coercive control. As well as to raise awareness and understanding of women’s coercive controlling behaviour and to encourage abusive women to seek help to change.

[5] Male victims of domestic abuse should no longer be categorised by the UK Government as being victims of “Violence Against Women and Girls.” They should have a parallel strategy: “Ending Intimate Violence Against Men and Boys” to ensure their voices are equally heard, their experiences not minimised, and they are no longer invisible. There should also be consideration of a strategy tackling violence within the family as there are wider issues in this regard that need to be addressed.

“Only by understanding the ways that this abuse is inflicted on and impacts men, can we develop effective support measures for victims”
— Nicola Graham-Kevan, UCLan Professor of Criminal Justice Psychology and Director of the Centre for Criminal Justice Research and Partnership


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

A Conversation with Greg Ellis (Regarding Men)

Fascinating (video, 56:29). Greg Ellis, an English Holywood actor and so much more, will be a Guest of Honour at ICMI21. Elizabeth Hobson and I will be interviewing him and hosting his live Q&A.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

Charlotte Dujardin wins her fifth Olympic medal, sat on her arse, while a castrated male did all the work

We return to horse ballet, otherwise known as dressage. A video of British “sportswoman” Charlotte Dujardin’s performance – or, rather, the horse’s performance – is here. The medal should have gone to Gio, the gelding (castrated male) who carried her while he was doing all the work.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Nobody connected with J4MB has ever drawn any personal income from the party’s income streams. If you’d like to support Mike Buchanan financially, you can do so via his Patreon account or through Bitcoin, his account address is 1EfWxqDAtgJDCR3tVpvVj4fXSuUu4S9WJf . Thank you.

ICMI2020 video #110 of 126: 1 June 2016 – Two anti-MGM protests in London, Mike Buchanan’s arrest in Parliament Square

Video #110 relates to two anti-MGM protests (video, 14:52) in 2016. The video was played during ICMI20 because a few videos didn’t arrive in time to publish during the event, so we substituted other videos in their place.

ICMI20 was very ambitious in scale – 126 speakers and interviewees – and many people haven’t caught all of the videos. To help remedy that, we’re publishing one video per day from early April until mid-August, so people have a reasonable chance of catching all, or most, of the material. Think of the videos as a daily Red Pill.

The videos will be published in the order in which they were originally published on our YouTube conference playlist. Paul Elam’s YouTube channel has 103,000+ subscribers – a few more than our channel – and also features the playlist.

ICMI2020 video #109 of 126: Xman (interview with Elizabeth Hobson and Brian Martinez)

Video #109 is an interview (video, 48:23) of Xman, details about him in the video description. The video was played during ICMI20 because a few videos didn’t arrive in time to publish during the event, so we substituted other videos in their place.

ICMI20 was very ambitious in scale – 126 speakers and interviewees – and many people haven’t caught all of the videos. To help remedy that, we’re publishing one video per day from early April until mid-August, so people have a reasonable chance of catching all, or most, of the material. Think of the videos as a daily Red Pill.

The videos will be published in the order in which they were originally published on our YouTube conference playlist. Paul Elam’s YouTube channel has 103,000+ subscribers – a few more than our channel – and also features the playlist.